Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Wallsendmag said:

 

If I'm being totally honest I've never been a fan of SJP since the extension in 2000. I've been unlucky enough to be put up in Level 7 three times so far this season and it's horrible. You just feel so detached from it all and there's more atmosphere on the moon. At the Chelsea game a dad and lad next to us trying to identify various landmarks from over the East Stand roof instead of watching the game. Says it all really.

Couldn't agree more.  Never liked the lopsided SJP, and the atmosphere is harmed by it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they're going to F5 everything then the best option is to move to a temporary stadium on Leazes for 2 years and rebuild SJP. That small rectangle of grass has been our home for 130 years and I'd quite like that to continue to be the place we played football if at all possible like

 

Moving 200m up the road isn't the end of the world but I'd like to stay put given the option

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Billy Warthog said:

Behold the future... ?

 

 

SoFiToon.jpg

 

I've always thought it would be rad to have the bowl of the stadium up on the Leazes Park hill and then something like the part (on the right) going down towards the new park where SJP was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, ponsaelius said:

The fact that the survey asked how much more you'd be willing to pay and started the slider at 50%. [emoji38] No way to say 'actually it's already quite pricey, like'.

Jesus wept.

 

Football sold its soul years ago.  I used to get very, very angry at this stuff.  All this in the poorest region of Great Britain. 

 

A lot of this is down to FFP.  All FFP seems to do is ensure that the ludicrously wealthy don't have to spend as much money on their vanity projects - the plebs just end up paying more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, midds said:

If they're going to F5 everything then the best option is to move to a temporary stadium on Leazes for 2 years and rebuild SJP. That small rectangle of grass has been our home for 130 years and I'd quite like that to continue to be the place we played football if at all possible like

 

Moving 200m up the road isn't the end of the world but I'd like to stay put given the option

Can't believe for a second that they'd willingly spend a couple of hundred million on a temporary stadium for a couple of years so that they can retain the same postal address, mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Wandy said:

It may be their thinking that having a significant corporate presence will allow standard ticketing to be kept at a “reasonable” level. This might well be the reasoning given for binning off SJP in its current state. An all new stadium, pretty much in the same area but with the scope to accommodate all class of fans in large numbers. The current stadium will simply never be able to do that.

Yep, I think so too - a new ground with extensive corporate areas.  SJP doesn't have the footprint to extend this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

St James didn't look like it looks like this in the 1980 or even more in the 1970. The place is scared but the shape of the stadium always use to be refurbished to give it the current look.

 

Hence I do like us to build perhaps the biggest and the most expensive stadium on the current lot we have. Make construction work as quick and as swift as possible and try to finsh it in a season or two.

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Strawberry said:

St James didn't look like it looks like this in the 1980 or even more in the 1970. The place is scared but the shape of the stadium always use to be refurbished to give it the current look.

 

Hence I do like us to build perhaps the biggest and the most expensive stadium on the current lot we have. Make construction work as quick and as swift as possible and try to finsh it in a season or two.

Where do we go in the meantime?  Newcastle isn’t surrounded by close places with big grounds.  A temporary stadium of requisite size will be a no-go.  There isn’t the room on Barrack Road to do what Spurs did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty moronic of the club to send out a survey with questions relating to corporate clients to normal folks. Great way to get people’s back ups. 
 

That being said, we need a new stadium that can accommodate everyone, from the rich folks to the bairns.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Where do we go in the meantime?  Newcastle isn’t surrounded by close places with big grounds.  A temporary stadium of requisite size will be a no-go.  There isn’t the room on Barrack Road to do what Spurs did.

Share the stadium with the smoggies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Strawberry said:

Share the stadium with the smoggies.


It's a no go sharing grounds with another club for a season (maybe more). The only club that could invoke any discussion is Sunderland and that would never happen in a month of Sundays. Before you even look at talking to the FA, Premier League or another club's Executives; it would be blocked straight away by another county's police force, who are not going to accept multi thousands of Newcastle fans into their city on numerous occasions. The bill for that would also be stupid and make it non viable from the start. 

 

 

Edited by et tu brute

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, et tu brute said:


It's a no go sharing grounds with another club for a season (maybe more). The only club that could invoke any discussion is Sunderland and that would never happen in a month of Sundays. Before you even look at talking to the FA, Premier League or another club's Executives; it would be blocked straight away by another county's police force, who are not going to accept multi thousands of Newcastle fans into their city on numerous occasions. The bill for that would also be stupid and make it non viable from the start. 

 

 

 

The police will do it if the money is right, we've had a Tory government for 13 years, its how they role.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Wandy said:

It may be their thinking that having a significant corporate presence will allow standard ticketing to be kept at a “reasonable” level. This might well be the reasoning given for binning off SJP in its current state. An all new stadium, pretty much in the same area but with the scope to accommodate all class of fans in large numbers. The current stadium will simply never be able to do that.

This.

If we are building a new stadium, be it new SJP or not, we are not going to be building a 60k stadium with 8k cinema sofa seats. It will be a 70k stadium with about 2k cinema sofa seats, and they will be placed in areas where the bars are located in anyway, plus the tunnel club that we’ll undoubtedly get.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, et tu brute said:


As I also mentioned the cost would be stupid money and not viable 

Our owners just paid £750 million for a golfer and £75 million to host a boxing event, I don't think they are short of a few bob 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Billy Warthog said:

Get the Arena site and build something similar to the SoFi Stadium... or maybe not...! I dunno. It's tricky as hell. 

Nah, I’d rather something like Spurs stadium, or the Lucas Oil Field. We’ll probably go for something like Atlanta’s though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s pretty damning that the known whingers on Twatter who have season tickets, and hold non-season ticket holders with control are all against this.

Aye class, so it’s great for you to say to fans of other clubs that your club has a 52k stadium, and 35k waiting to get in, but you just don’t want to let any of those 35k in and keep skating them over things like the ballot etc which doesn’t even effect you.

 

Honestly though, as a former season ticket holders (over 2 different periods) and as a member, I want my email, and to have my say.

Not fair that they are asking people who already have a season ticket, but not asking their potential new season tickets holders who they would be increasing the capacity for.

 

 

Edited by Stifler

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, r0cafella said:

Fundamentally, isn’t more seats for the average Joe and more seats for corporates a win win? I don’t quite understand the negativity to this aspect of it? 

This, but there is a little section of our current season ticket holders (by no means all, or even the majority) who are just wanting to bait non-season ticket holders.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ben said:

Our owners just paid £750 million for a golfer and £75 million to host a boxing event, I don't think they are short of a few bob 


They're not but they're not stupid either by paying huge amounts when it's not needed. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...