Guest Invicta_Toon Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Like I actually know what Tery Mac does FYP true. not sure what you're trying to prove though.... That you don't know what he does. was I saying I did like? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Knightrider Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Alex man, don't man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Brilliant. Just what we need, them three. Go toon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Like I actually know what Tery Mac does FYP true. not sure what you're trying to prove though.... That you don't know what he does. was I saying I did like? Was I saying you were saying you do like? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Like I actually know what Tery Mac does FYP true. not sure what you're trying to prove though.... That you don't know what he does. was I saying I did like? Was I saying you were saying you do like? troll tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Like I actually know what Tery Mac does FYP true. not sure what you're trying to prove though.... That you don't know what he does. was I saying I did like? Was I saying you were saying you do like? troll tbh Calm down Steve. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syrette Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 If this is true what a survivor Terry Mac is. Luckiest bloke in football tbh. I really don't know what it is, it can't be his coaching skills Tea-lady, must be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC06 Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Doubt it. Sam will bring his own team in as soon as he can. Clarkie however might stay. This. I think we can agree from the tone of that article Clarkie is secure - but the part in bold is unsubstantiated supposition with no quotes or anything firmer than "likely" and "seems to be" Can't see Terry Mac being given a job by Allardyce unless Shepherd made it a term of Big Sam's employment, which I think we can count out given the "free reign" line with regards to staff... Agree with you. Allardyce told Clark he wants to work with him but said nothing about Pearson and Tery Mac. Actually i would be very surprised if Allardyce decided to work with Pearson Im expecting his assistent manager to be someone who he has worked before. Ultimately this artcle doesnt say Pearson and Mac are staying for sure. Only speculations and guessing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 I like the way no-one really knows anything about Pearson apart from he sat down in his chair once but he isn't good enough, obviously Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest elbee909 Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 They'll be on contracts, that'll have to be paid up if they're axed now anyway. Keep them around, their roles will decreased in scope as more staff come in, but wouldn't expect any contract renewals for them once their contracts have run their course, tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 I like the way no-one really knows anything about Pearson apart from he sat down in his chair once but he isn't good enough, obviously What more do we need to know, other than he isn't good enough? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 I like the way no-one really knows anything about Pearson apart from he sat down in his chair once but he isn't good enough, obviously What more do we need to know, other than he isn't good enough? Please explain to me why he isnt good enough? Or do you actually have no clue about him at all but because we didnt win enough games under Roeder he must be shit? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 They'll be on contracts, that'll have to be paid up if they're axed now anyway. Keep them around, their roles will decreased in scope as more staff come in, but wouldn't expect any contract renewals for them once their contracts have run their course, tbh. Probably the reason they're staying for now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 I like the way no-one really knows anything about Pearson apart from he sat down in his chair once but he isn't good enough, obviously What more do we need to know, other than he isn't good enough? Please explain to me why he isnt good enough? Or do you actually have no clue about him at all but because we didnt win enough games under Roeder he must be shit? Well, he must have an input into the team and coaching, and if he did that under Roeder, he did a shite job. What do we know about him to prove that he IS worthwhile? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 To be fair, I think it's a decent enough point from Jon. Same goes for Lee Clark who may have potential to be a decent coach - you never know. I think we can write-off Terry Mac though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 To be fair, I think it's a decent enough point from Jon. Same goes for Lee Clark who may have potential to be a decent coach - you never know. I think we can write-off Terry Mac though. Bollocks to potential, lets get soem good, proven coaches and an assistant in. Let them prove whether or not they are good enough somewhere else, i'm sick of us pretending potential is actually ability. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Really why post shit were are the quotes terry mac is staying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 To be fair, I think it's a decent enough point from Jon. Same goes for Lee Clark who may have potential to be a decent coach - you never know. I think we can write-off Terry Mac though. Bollocks to potential, lets get soem good, proven coaches and an assistant in. Let them prove whether or not they are good enough somewhere else, i'm sick of us pretending potential is actually ability. I sort of agree there but all I meant is that Allardyce should have a look at him and if he has got some potential then a role with the Academy or something may be appropriate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leazes1986 Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Everyone needs to calm down here. Clarkie is obviously staying, but i thought that would happen anyway. Absolutely nothing to back up that line about Terry Mac and Pearson though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
samag Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Clarkie will be staying as reserve team coach. Sam needs to sort out the first team before he starts to worry about the reserves. It will also give him time to have a look at Clarkie to see if he thinks he is up to the job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 i dont understand why people are so hostile to lee clark. Its not as if many if any here actually know anything about his coaching abilities. He is a young coach starting off, is it the fact that he is related to the club a problem? Yet we cream ourselves over the prospect of getting Rob Lee, Ferdinand or Gary Speed to the club, why would they be considerably better? Lee Clark has always been determined and focused on coaching, he has done it for a while now with Youth teams, just because he wasnt world class as a player doesnt mean he wont aspire to anything in the coaching world. Had we appointed Coleman pre fulham would people have been happy and not sceptical? people are never happy around here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC06 Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 I like the way no-one really knows anything about Pearson apart from he sat down in his chair once but he isn't good enough, obviously What more do we need to know, other than he isn't good enough? Please explain to me why he isnt good enough? Or do you actually have no clue about him at all but because we didnt win enough games under Roeder he must be shit? the team he picked against Watford says it all tbh Pattison ahead of Zoggy and Luque... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 I like the way no-one really knows anything about Pearson apart from he sat down in his chair once but he isn't good enough, obviously What more do we need to know, other than he isn't good enough? Please explain to me why he isnt good enough? Or do you actually have no clue about him at all but because we didnt win enough games under Roeder he must be shit? the team he picked against Watford says it all tbh Pattison ahead of Zoggy and Luque... Zog was acting the twat and Luque won't be here next season. what possible reason was there to play either of them? edt: don't bother, just realised who posted it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC06 Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 I like the way no-one really knows anything about Pearson apart from he sat down in his chair once but he isn't good enough, obviously What more do we need to know, other than he isn't good enough? Please explain to me why he isnt good enough? Or do you actually have no clue about him at all but because we didnt win enough games under Roeder he must be shit? the team he picked against Watford says it all tbh Pattison ahead of Zoggy and Luque... Zog was acting the twat and Luque won't be here next season. what possible reason was there to play either of them? edt: don't bother, just realised who posted it and you know this from where exactly? and the reason is:because they are miles better then him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fraser Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 What has Lee Clarke done wrong as a coach? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now