Dave Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 Wind up IMO. Quite an good one at that too. Dont thinks so http://www.visir.is/article/20070819/FRETTIR01/70819034 Eh? Same website. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Power NUFC Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 http://mbl.is/mm/sport/mot/enski/frett.html?nid=1286194 this the leading newspaper picking it up,its only matter of time until it rech the news in uk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmymag Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 If he is involved in this takeover then it concerns him. Eh? If he's acting as some sort of figurehead of this new takeover (IF), then he's sticking his nose where it doesn't belong. Let Mort and Ashley get on with their jobs. Maybe he's concerned they're not bigging him up enough. Shearer wasn't involved in Match of The Day this weekend, obviously up to no good! Or he could just be on the golf course. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest microbar Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 Not happy these takeovers should only be allowed in the closed season, Cant see ashley wanting to make a quick profit thought he was in for the long term. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 All this talk of Ashley wanting to make a quick buck - he's worth £2bn. I can't see him packing it in for £20m or whatever they'd give him more than what he paid. It'd be like Bill Gates going to Vegas, winning £40 and quitting while he's ahead. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 I hope this isn't true. Even though commucation from Mike Ashley has still not been up to scratch, at least Mort was making all the right noises these past few weeks.. It will be interesting to see what they will do now. Can they resist the temptation of a quick, huge profit if this materialises into a serious bid? Also, how will the Halls and Shepherds feel if that's the case? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 Well this is the way I see it. If Ashley rejects a £30-40 million profit (it has to be more then the last 'bid' after all) then great, it proves his commitment. If he accepts it, then he never had any commitment to NUFC at all. In which case I'd be happy that we'd seen the back of him sooner rather then later Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 All this talk of Ashley wanting to make a quick buck - he's worth £2bn. I can't see him packing it in for £20m or whatever they'd give him more than what he paid. It'd be like Bill Gates going to Vegas, winning £40 and quitting while he's ahead. Far simpler to take up a load of short positions on the current stock market. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSG Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 All this talk of Ashley wanting to make a quick buck - he's worth £2bn. I can't see him packing it in for £20m or whatever they'd give him more than what he paid. It'd be like Bill Gates going to Vegas, winning £40 and quitting while he's ahead. Quality comparison Spot on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 Well this is the way I see it. If Ashley rejects a £30-40 million profit (it has to be more then the last 'bid' after all) then great, it proves his commitment. If he accepts it, then he never had any commitment to NUFC at all. In which case I'd be happy that we'd seen the back of him sooner rather then later That's a good way of looking at it, but it ignores the fact that if he sells at a profit so quickly it is partly at the expense of investments that could have otherwise been made into the club by the new owners (aside from obviously our previous owners, who would have sold too cheaply). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 All this talk of Ashley wanting to make a quick buck - he's worth £2bn. I can't see him packing it in for £20m or whatever they'd give him more than what he paid. It'd be like Bill Gates going to Vegas, winning £40 and quitting while he's ahead. Quality comparison Spot on. Nope, 20 million is 20 million. The comparison would be more factual if Bill Gates would have just won 500 million in Vegas.. I think he would be tempted to call it the day and order a bottle of champagne.. 40 pounds would be used as toilet paper by either billionaire, so I don't see how this would be a good comparison... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSG Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 All this talk of Ashley wanting to make a quick buck - he's worth £2bn. I can't see him packing it in for £20m or whatever they'd give him more than what he paid. It'd be like Bill Gates going to Vegas, winning £40 and quitting while he's ahead. Quality comparison Spot on. Nope, 20 million is 20 million. The comparison would be more factual if Bill Gates would have just won 500 million in Vegas.. I think he would be tempted to call it the day and order a bottle of champagne.. 40 pounds would be used as toilet paper by either billionaire, so I don't see how this would be a good comparison... In the grand scheme of things though, 20 milion is nowt to Ashley. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 Sell up Ashley. You're only holding us back. /Thorin, I miss you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 Well this is the way I see it. If Ashley rejects a £30-40 million profit (it has to be more then the last 'bid' after all) then great, it proves his commitment. If he accepts it, then he never had any commitment to NUFC at all. In which case I'd be happy that we'd seen the back of him sooner rather then later That's a good way of looking at it, but it ignores the fact that if he sells at a profit so quickly it is partly at the expense of investments that could have otherwise been made into the club by the new owners (aside from obviously our previous owners, who would have sold too cheaply). Nothing can be done about that now though so what's the point of worrying about it? Also I hope Shepherd did sell to cheaply, I hope he has sleepless nights over it the fat tit... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LucasUnger Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 has anyone got a new picture of mike ashley? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LucasUnger Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 because i only know the picture of him where he sits on the desk(or somethin like a desk, cant remember) and on german premiere they always show a great haired bloke who doesn't look like ashley (on the picture i know) at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/8110/mikeashley5fb6.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chief Bluntasnot Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 I bet he got that shirt from Sportsworld when they were having a 75% off all YSL clobber Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 All this talk of Ashley wanting to make a quick buck - he's worth £2bn. I can't see him packing it in for £20m or whatever they'd give him more than what he paid. It'd be like Bill Gates going to Vegas, winning £40 and quitting while he's ahead. Quality comparison Spot on. Not really no.... I think a better comparison would be a hustler winning £40 in vegas and quiting while he's ahead. Either way it does seem incredibly petty to go to all this trouble and cost (£160 million or more) only to sell up for a £30 million profit a few months later.. Especially when you have 70 times that in the bank already.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LucasUnger Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 r u sure that this is mike ashley??´ as i said before. they always show someone else on premiere?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceMag Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 The story from the evening news tonight. Even though you probably can't understand anything that's being said there, it confirms that the story is gathering pace. Link Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSG Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 r u sure that this is mike ashley??´ as i said before. they always show someone else on premiere?? That's Shepherd 20 years ago mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliassenfredrik Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 The story from the evening news tonight. Even though you probably can't understand anything that's being said there, it confirms that the story is gathering pace. Link Not impossible for a Norwegian to understand, but hard! 8) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 r u sure that this is mike ashley??´ as i said before. they always show someone else on premiere?? Chris Mort. Thin guy with glasses? He's the Chairman... Mike Ashley is the billionaire owner (does not attend any games.) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmymag Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 The story from the evening news tonight. Even though you probably can't understand anything that's being said there, it confirms that the story is gathering pace. Link Aye, can confirm that Shearer and Newcastle were mentioned in that Icelandic news clip. Didn't have a fucking clue what they were going on about mind. Also saw Roger Moore towards the end of the clip, is he involved in the takeover as well??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now