-
Posts
33,027 -
Joined
Everything posted by Shearergol
-
Still in for Harrison I think.
-
Got to say, that’s a huge signing for West Ham, but they really do need a better striker. Maybe the Italian lad will come good.
-
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Newcastle United - 28/8/22 @ 2pm (Sky Sports)
Shearergol replied to HaydnNUFC's topic in Football
True, but technically neither do we yet -
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Newcastle United - 28/8/22 @ 2pm (Sky Sports)
Shearergol replied to HaydnNUFC's topic in Football
They outplayed Spurs. They’re a striker away from being really good imo -
Wolverhampton Wanderers vs. Newcastle United - 28/8/22 @ 2pm (Sky Sports)
Shearergol replied to HaydnNUFC's topic in Football
Bruno off the mark, 1-1 -
Martin Dúbravka (now playing for Burnley)
Shearergol replied to Figures 1-0 Football's topic in Football
Dislike -
I’ll not talk about him but….
-
striker isn’t Wood’s best position either, don’t worry.
-
Not entirely sure that’s a negative anymore
-
Perhaps he’s improving then…
-
Made of glass though
-
No, he means two in even without outgoings. I think
-
No, but my first post explicitly stated I’d be against a one in one out for this, which kinda already answered your question, no?
-
But that was the point I was replying to I don’t either.
-
As I say, it’s speculation on what our budget is. If Wilson is now injured we won’t be signing a Maddison
-
Newcastle are unsure on what to do next….
-
If it means that’s our entire budget gone, yes. Chris Wood is the reason. We need a striker. obviously in the ideal world we’ll get both, so it’s all a circumstantial conversation.
-
Leeds unlikely to let their most in form player go? Quite a reach that….
-
If selling Almiron means we can sign Maddison and Pedro, then yeah. If selling him means we only buy Maddison then no. Our squad is too small/shit for a one in one out policy.
-
It’s all guesswork about fees, but my personal view is you should upgrade your worst players first. Murphy, then Fraser, then Almiron.