Skeletor

He's not very good at telling non-white players apart when handing out red cards for sure.

I forgot how f***ing diabolical that challenge was! Martinez was a f***ing disgrace after that match as well. Not even a yellow, think it got given as a foul so no retrospective action could be taken because the ref saw it. That odious t*** Whealen defended it as well Wasn't even given as a foul.

Goals on Sunday said they thought it wasn't a red card. Even turbo cunt Poyet said it wasn't.

Poyet: 'It's rare Sunderland want a player that no-one else wants. If someone else wants them they go there'

According to Goals on Sunday, Noble's red card might not get rescinded because West Ham players surrounded the ref. Kinda goes against what they were saying on MOTD yesterday that you must surround the ref because cheating is important.

He didn't even sound convincing when he tried to say Mitrovic should have been sent off. Just reading the script.

Keown talking bollocks as expected.

Looks even softer now.

Watching MOTD but don't know why. The pundits are just gonna make me angry.

Richards

Partly because 'he's not that type of player'. Unfortunately Mitrovic hasn't helped himself from that perspective. Ha! Gareth Barry got booked for Everton earlier on and Niall Quinn said "he's not that type of player" and the commentator pointed out that Barry is in fact the most booked player in premier league history so IS that type of player! 'Not that type of player' just means British/plays for a Sky 4 team.

Mcclaren says they'll appeal. Don't see the point. Them overturning it will basically be an admission that Marriner was corrupt throughout.

He can have a 3 game ban for when he signs for us then.

The only way he won't fail is if he moves on before it happens (IE to England or whatever). He'll just fail on the biggest stage instead.

Thauvin and Bellerin had a clash of legs in the box before the sending off. Must of been something and nothing then as I can't remember any major protests etc either from their players or their arsehole fans. The commentators and pundits kept bringing it up to try and excuse all of Marriner's decisions.

Thauvin and Bellerin had a clash of legs in the box before the sending off.

No he doesn't. If he thinks it's not a penalty then it has to be viewed as simulation with Bellerin's reaction. What? There was clear contact, obviously Bellerin is going to feel it's a penalty. I'd imagine that he's not given it based on the fact that it was an accidental coming together of the players' legs. Nah if he sees it, he gives the penalty. The commentators even pointed out that his view was obscured. So he should have to book Bellerin for diving if he didn't see the incident? He should check with his linesman because if he doesn't believe there's been contact (hence not giving the penalty) then he needs to establish whether there was simulation.

No he doesn't. If he thinks it's not a penalty then it has to be viewed as simulation with Bellerin's reaction. What? There was clear contact, obviously Bellerin is going to feel it's a penalty. I'd imagine that he's not given it based on the fact that it was an accidental coming together of the players' legs. Nah if he sees it, he gives the penalty. The commentators even pointed out that his view was obscured.

No he doesn't. If he thinks it's not a penalty then it has to be viewed as simulation with Bellerin's reaction.

If he doesn't give the penalty he has to book Bellerin for diving as well.

Might be a case of Anita being on a yellow card with Marriner dishing out yellow cards for breathing.

Give it to them.

They actually have the nerve to complain about Marriner after he was their MOTM?

I hope we beat Watford. Getting a fair refereeing performance will be crucial though.

He's just following the usual Pardew boom-bust cycle.