madras

We were linked for a while. Seemed like the price (60mill I think) took us to Sven.

I'm not so sure Man Utd would be as big a draw if it weren't for the wages right now

2nd half away at Brentford I think.

Got to remember as we get better players we can be more flexible and have more options. We can stop being a 433 team and alter it on a game by game basis. The way we ended the season I wouldn't be comfortable in saying we are a back 3, 4 or 5 team. Same can happen throughout the team.

Because I really don't think they'll put up a struggle. (You bloody took your time falling in to that )

Wanted 25mill for Jack Clarke as well.

I don't.

Why ? Comparisons need to be placed in context though

Which is worse, Bezos losing 10billion or me losing 10k ? It's not the gross numbers it's the effect they have. How much have you spent in their time ? How many years in the champions league? How many trophies? What wages can you afford ?

Isn't he a left back ?

Technically true but lacking context.

Not quite that simple. What if we have to pay close on 200kpw for the 60mill player. That raises the wage expectation on not only future incomings but contract negotiations with current players.

Stick Isak at right midfield and see how many MotM performances he puts in. Some were saying before he kicked a ball for us that he has to play centrally. Because of where he was started the whole team was disjointed for a while.

Wonder if he has the Carabou cup tatted on his other arm ? He has the Serie A trophy on that one.

Literally (see above).

I remember thinking the same about Livramento and Hall. I'm quite happy to go along with whatever the scouting team and management want, they've proved they know more than me. It's not like the Ashley and Bruce days when we'd be l7nked with someone and collectively think "he's shit" at worst or "he's slightly better than what we've got" at best.

The Premier league will be panicking, who will referee Man Utds games from now on ?

Does it matter on player transfers if the clubs aren't "associated parties" ? (Like our buying Vlachodimos ?)

That's Matt Targett money !

When he played on the right. I spent most of yesterday's game (and probably every game they've played together) muttering to myself to switch Gordon and Barnes.

I thought she went back to Italy for work. Just made it distant for a while.

Something like the council bought their training ground above going rate then let it back for a peppercorn rent.

They really don't care, providing they pay.

No. They want them but they don't to or can't pay the money needed.

I totally get that. What if we had all those shots and they just went wide ? Still zero shots on target. You know, I like xG as a stat, it's not perfect but gives a decent idea as to how a game went in a way that zero shots on target doesn't