Jump to content

thomas

Member
  • Posts

    37,016
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by thomas

  1. It's basically paying to watch softcore aerobics porn tbh. The exclusivity of that price buys some lookers. All spandex, flat tummies and fake titties everywhere. And that's just the guys.
  2. definitely seems so. standing off more and playing a few yards deeper :|
  3. have heard annie-chee-bee and anne-each-e-bee, but ameobi is just mean
  4. lots of technical fouls being called this weekend. Encroachment on a kickoff?
  5. suppose he could get him on unsportsmanlike behavior if it happened more than once. How, if it's not a foul? Two examples I saw in the LOAF where a referee can issue caution. Given the leeway given to a referee's interpretation, I don't see how it would be too controversial - p125 - Delaying the restart of the game e.g. by taking a free kick from the wrong position with the sole intention of forcing the referee to order a retake. p123 - Unsporting behaviour , e.g. acting in a manner that shows disrespect to the game. edit: here i am poring over the laws of association football on a saturday night what am i doing with my life
  6. I've literally never heard about it before You've never wondered why players don't just dribble the ball from a free kick/corner?! So why wasn't a in-direct free kick offered then? Seems to me a rule that favours only the kick taker. when it's taken from inside the penalty area, the ball isn't "live" until it leaves the penalty area. Since Hart fucked it up inside, it was just a retake. Anywhere else on the field and it would have been, or if his 2nd touch had been outside the box. load of bullshit tbh he fucked up he shouldn't get a get out of jail free card Sorry I'm quoting the wrong law http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/footballdevelopment/refereeing/02/36/01/11/27_06_2014_new--lawsofthegameweben_neutral.pdf page 42 If, when a free kick is taken by the defending team from inside its own penalty area, the ball is not kicked directly out of the penalty area: • the kick is retaken
  7. I've literally never heard about it before You've never wondered why players don't just dribble the ball from a free kick/corner?! So why wasn't a in-direct free kick offered then? Seems to me a rule that favours only the kick taker. when it's taken from inside the penalty area, the ball isn't "live" until it leaves the penalty area. Since Hart fucked it up inside, it was just a retake. Anywhere else on the field or if his 2nd touch had been outside the box it would have been an IFK to QPR.
  8. yeah, that's how I read that expression too. Astonishingly shit
  9. I will never not laugh at that picture :lol:
  10. thomas

    Dogawful Officiating

    IFK from inside the box isn't considered in play until it leaves it. If Hart had touched it twice to dribble outside the area then that would have been worthy of awarding one to QPR, agreed, but I think Dean was right to tell him to take it again as it hadn't left the box. Same as if it had been in motion when kicked, see those taken back all the time. It annoys me when a player deliberately touches the ball before its left the 18 yard box from a goal kick as they know it's going to run to an on rushing forward. Refs just make the keeper take the kick again when surely they should be punishing the defender for preventing a clear goal scoring opportunity. yeah, it's poor sportsmanship, and refs are given leeway in their discretion on punishing it, seems like some should tbh
  11. thomas

    Dogawful Officiating

    http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/footballdevelopment/refereeing/02/36/01/11/27_06_2014_new--lawsofthegameweben_neutral.pdf loaf page 42 - If, when a free kick is taken by the defending team from inside its own penalty area, the ball is not kicked directly out of the penalty area: • the kick is retaken edit: he's definitely lucky someone saw it and fuck man city forever, no argument there
×
×
  • Create New...