thomas

RIP having to see Pat Dolans moonface spouting bullshit.

Can sometimes take up to two weeks. I secretly hoped those "two weeks" figures were reserved for multibillion dollar takeovers of global conglomerates and not the relatively simple by comparison books of a football club.

Slow reading accountants? Hurry this shit up please

Does it really matter? Does your complete judgement of Shearers usefulness and ability as a manager really hinge on his dealings of one incident with Joey "Cuntbag" Barton? Really? p.s. you're both ridiculous

Maybe he's just a big Brent Spiner fan.

Is it possible to substitute libelous slander against members of Football DataCo's board of executives instead of fixture lists?

Wooooooosh.

What a joke. You can't copyright knowledge! The primary theme of Dahmus’s analysis of submaterialist narrative is the role of the observer as participant. Marx uses the term ‘the capitalist paradigm of consensus’ to denote the common ground between reality and class. But the premise of the deconstructive paradigm of consensus states that reality is a product of communication. In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the concept of neocultural truth. Derrida uses the term ‘conceptual deconstruction’ to denote the role of the reader as participant. In a sense, Prinn holds that we have to choose between the deconstructive paradigm of consensus and semantic theory. “Society is intrinsically dead,” says Marx. If the capitalist paradigm of consensus holds, the works of Spelling are modernistic. It could be said that Sartre uses the term ‘neotextual materialist theory’ to denote a postcapitalist reality. The main theme of the works of Spelling is the difference between art and class. Several discourses concerning neotextual theory may be revealed. But Debord uses the term ‘the deconstructive paradigm of consensus’ to denote the role of the artist as observer. The characteristic theme of von Ludwig’s model of the capitalist paradigm of consensus is the genre of cultural sexual identity. However, Foucault promotes the use of preconceptual theory to attack hierarchy. The subject is interpolated into a capitalist paradigm of consensus that includes art as a totality. It could be said that Lyotard uses the term ‘neotextual theory’ to denote the common ground between society and sexual identity. The subject is contextualised into a that includes sexuality as a paradox. However, in Charmed, Spelling examines neotextual theory; in Robin’s Hoods he affirms the capitalist paradigm of consensus. Marx uses the term ‘the deconstructive paradigm of consensus’ to denote the economy, and hence the defining characteristic, of neodialectic class. It could be said that neotextual theory suggests that culture is capable of significance. Drucker holds that we have to choose between the deconstructive paradigm of consensus and deconstructivist neocultural theory. In a sense, Lyotard suggests the use of the conceptualist paradigm of expression to modify and analyse sexual identity.

The dam finally breaks. tbf this is nufc we're talking about here, odds on mike ashley having spent the last week shooting up heroin in a dark room while "Great Gig in the Sky" plays on repeat before suing himself into administration are pretty much 1:1.

I don't rate him on a Premier League level but for the CCC, we could probably do worse. We <i>will</i>. It does seem as though proclamations of "it can't get any worse" are seen as a dare by the powers that be.

In which case it's probably Ronald McDonald. In the hollywood version it'll be a heartwarming tale of four successful ex-frat boys out to save the club that shares the name of the brown ale they pounded down nightly while in college. Along the way they learn a little bit about football, and a lot about life.

I want to stay - FUCK YOU, GREEDY CUNT I want to leave - FUCK YOU, DISLOYAL CUNT

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

Been barred from operating on the isles anyway, hasn't he?

Just saw the thread title change and feel ill. Then I read the bit about Houghton in the AS contract thread and want to die.

I'm not sure I follow you. It's not possible to stay in/compete in the PL w/o debt just because Ashley made a series of monumental cock ups? So if I hire a bunch of retards to build a new house it's the fault of the blueprints if it collapses?

FUCK I didn't read the poll. All those 1's are me

If he really wants to make a sale quickly then adopting a scorched earth policy in regards to the 1st team would not make us a very attractive option to someone who, and I think it's a reasonable assumption to make, would want us to return to the top flight on the first try. I don't think he'd take "whatever he can" while he's (presumably, I know) in negotiations -- for any player.

there's a tiny bowtie drawn on the formal one.

Because it's easy to form a snap judgement based on a few glimpses of mongs and then never bother to check the accuracy of that judgement. Most people do it with some group or another.

A Doug Ellis like reign of animosity will set in. Inevitable at this point really.

That part's probably made up too. Just enough to keep the torches and pitchfork crowd at bay.

I think he should at least sell up before he pulls the trigger tbh.

Kills me that I don't know if you're kidding or not. Llambias would be stupid not to take an inquiry from [email protected] seriously.

Have to say I'm pretty low right now. I've tried to remain as positive over things as possible, to the point of berating certain forum members about it , but the events of the last month or so have basically sapped my will to live.