thomas

Souness was a shite appointment and 99% of this board said so at the time. An overwhelming majority saw the trouble coming. Souness set us back, there is no question about it. No amount previous managers qualifying for europe changes that fact. No amount of current chairmen backing/not backing the manager changes that fact. No amount of pre-1992 boards changes that fact. No amount of previous chairmen backing/not backing the manager changes that fact. Freddy got the Souness appointment all wrong NE5. You're well and truly terminally deluded if you think that wasn't the case.

Joke of a fan really, he just wears whichever shirt he fancies that week. Three weeks ago it was a Man U shirt and then he went right back to Liverpool the next week. edit: joke of a show as well. They had Lalas on and were berating him as to why Beckham wouldn't show up on their two bit show. Completely full of themselves and I can't stand that Chelsea supporter host.

An epistemological debate over football managers, what next.

What I wouldn't do to see Zanetti or Cruz here though

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/45/bigheadedtinydogchasingqp7.gif

He may have been going off prior information that had changed when he made those statements? Actually I don't recall Allardyce being particularly talkative about transfers above and beyond saying just how difficult it is to get bodies in in January and how he doubted there would be much activity. However I'd like to clear up semantics. When we were talking "fractions of 100m" we were both talking substantial (15m+) slices of it correct? I'd hate for this to be a misunderstanding over the pedantic but correct figure of 1.5m also being a "fraction". £100m more? Yes I think it is. Make no mistake, I do to, but I would imagine the amount he'll back his own man to be a pretty hefty amount.

Why would you "must surely offer" a fraction of that to a manager you're going to sack? I'm afraid A doesn't follow from B here, as it pertains to debunking the 100m figure. If he knew he was going to sack Allardyce, why didn't he do it earlier then? Listen to yourself man . He was going to give some fraction of 100m (A figure I feel is grossly exaggerated as well, btw) to someone he was going to sack? The timing is irrelevant. Possibly? Is it so outside the realm of possibility to think that Ashley would back his own choice much more than Shepherds?

Why would you "must surely offer" a fraction of that to a manager you're going to sack? I'm afraid A doesn't follow from B here, as it pertains to debunking the 100m figure.

Aye. Under Shepherd there were bad times as well as good times but it's history. Hope Mort's getting his bad ones out of the way early like.

Kluivert sprang to mind instantly. edit: don't even know/care where he plays now, was just the posterboy for that kind of player. Can't disassociate him from that in my mind.

I'd rather have a kid playing than Smith, Butt, Duff or Barton. This, completely.

Harp Beye Diatta Taylor que? Lua2 Faye Emre Zog Carroll Martins

First person I've ever seen allergic to question marks.

Contract is until 2012. 4 more years of it? Does it bear thinking about? What's he on, 50k a week?. at 40 paid weeks and 4 more years that's 50k * 160 or £8m. if 50,000 fans all donated £160 we could see if Mike Ashley would listen to offers to buy out his contract. I'm down for it.

You're having a laugh surely? Alright, maybe not the last. But he certainly doesn't show any more quality or put in any more effort than the current bunch of tossers. Probably the most hit or miss player we've got. How many games he just simply not turned up? Definitely not what you want in a relegation battle. He has more pace than either of them, has a decent shot on him, can trap a ball and move forward with it and can OCCASIONALLY at least complete a fucking pass. Trust me I'm not happy saying he should even be in the starting XI, but he should be starting over either of them. Compared to Butt and Smith he's Maradona.

We'd look fucking mint. I'd immigrate and pick up one sure.

Not picking up a card are we Alan? Can't miss some games, can we Alan? Why have you been anonymous today, Alan? Fuck off, ALAN.

first thing I've smiled at since this game started.

starting to look like the ridiculous decision the rest of the country said it was To be fair they were only playing the odds. The chances of Newcastle making a good decision hasn't been exactly stellar the last few years.

I'd like to go and die now.

Not that I expected anything, I mean. Shit players, shit game, shit result, same old same old.

the everloving fuck was that

We're beaten for pace in practically every area though. It's either pressure with bodies back or pressure on the break with 2 on 3's :\

The rain can be our 12th man. Only hope of stopping their passing.

I hope seeing Man U getting shafted isn't the high point of my day