Wullie

Manchester wasn't it? Ashton under Lyme iirc. Was more a joke at how ITV mention it everytime he plays for either Roma or Italy. Ah right aye, well the fact I remember it was Ashton under Lyme bears that out.

Manchester wasn't it? Ashton under Lyme iirc.

Give him away.

There are loads of differences Obviously, but the above is the main sticking point of any dreams of getting recompense from Barton. Not gonna happen.

I think there's a very clear difference between the Mutu situation and Barton's which will stop any such action - that being that Mutu's actions made him unavailable for selection and therefore in pretty obvious breach of his contract for a whole season. Barton on the other hand might not even miss one game.

Their best player is probably going to be on his bike, don't forget.

3 points is not miles ahead.

Hamann with a touch of Scouse there.

How shit is that Odonkor? I'll enjoy these twats getting knocked out.

Come on!

God I can't stand Croatia.

Howay you stupid Germans.

I see you've mellowed out a bit in your absence.

His real chance to impress will come in the next game when the stakes are massive and conditions will almost certainly be a lot better.

Absurd spelling. Twice as well.

Was €13m an absurb valuation? Overpriced, possibly. Absurb though?

Rozehnal made a couple of terrible ricks today.

Eh? What gamble? They just didnt want to sell him before the euros as they knew that what ever happened they'd get more after it. Or are you whoooosing They said he could go for a price we weren't prepared to pay at the time. They wanted to wait until after the Euros to see if they could get that price, which they probably will now - probably more and very possibly not off us, whether we're prepared to raise it or not.

We've taken a gamble and it might well not pay off now. Nuts.

Fuck.

The Apprentice my arse, there's a bloody game on!

They made a mess of that, should have scored.

Emre's obviously told the other Turkish lads to do us a favour.

As others have said that is wrong, but the situation almost never arises. How is it wrong? Say there is 2 strikers and the opposition goalkeeper no defenders are involved. The goalie comes out and the player slides it to the other team mate. If player B is behind player A and the pass is "backwards" then he is onside right? Yes but if B is in front of A (would have to be a shit pass) and the ball goes backwards, B goes back and gets it, then it's offside. Hence it being a hypothetical situation that's very unlikely to happen.