Wullie

Be disappointed if we don't win tonight but then something's got to go wrong on the field sooner or later, 10 from 12 would be too good to be true.

Missed a howler of a header in the first half.

Last minute Leyton Orient equaliser costs me £30, what an absolute set of cunts.

Why? What's he on? 80k isn't it? Pretty sure we won't go much above 50k. Whether we should or not is a whole topic by itself. So "couldn't" is a misrepresentation. And I've no idea what he's on, neither do you. I do know that they have made out like Enrique, Barton, Nolan, Carroll were all on mega money that was unsubstainable and yet the wage bill has supposedly gone up by 7%. So what are the new lads on? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/6990213/Daniel-Sturridge-could-cost-Chelsea-as-much-as-6.5m.html a) I don't think journalists know a player's personal financial circumstances any more than you or I do Why not? They have more contacts in the football world than me or you. Because it's a very private matter between a person and their employer and I think journalists just guess at a ballpark figure.

Why? What's he on? 80k isn't it? Pretty sure we won't go much above 50k. Whether we should or not is a whole topic by itself. So "couldn't" is a misrepresentation. And I've no idea what he's on, neither do you. I do know that they have made out like Enrique, Barton, Nolan, Carroll were all on mega money that was unsubstainable and yet the wage bill has supposedly gone up by 7%. So what are the new lads on? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/6990213/Daniel-Sturridge-could-cost-Chelsea-as-much-as-6.5m.html a) I don't think journalists know a player's personal financial circumstances any more than you or I do b) I would say £60k would be a more than fair wage for a player of his talent, in fact I'd say we were getting him cheap if that's what we had to pay, not that it necessarily would have been of course

Where's that come from? I'm surprised. The 7% figure? The club's responses to the Chronicle questions.

Why? What's he on? 80k isn't it? Pretty sure we won't go much above 50k. Whether we should or not is a whole topic by itself. So "couldn't" is a misrepresentation. And I've no idea what he's on, neither do you. I do know that they have made out like Enrique, Barton, Nolan, Carroll were all on mega money that was unsubstainable and yet the wage bill has supposedly gone up by 7%. So what are the new lads on?

Why? What's he on?

He's nee Lovenkrands like.

Sturridge is absolutely fucking great.

Had a furious text from our mutual friend last night about that interview. Think I got the same text.

Get in Terry.

Injured, surely?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2035712/Bill-Kenwright-exclusive-The-pain-pride-owner-Everton.html The Greatest Sob Story Ever Told.

Fair enough if you don't want to cheer him, absolutely understand that, but why would anybody boo him?

Just need Sessegnon to take the huff now.

They've got some fucking nerve bringing up the issue of turnover when vast swathes of our advertising space is being given away for free to promote his cheap tat.

Aye, played right into the sensible spending/right players for Newcastle regardless of cost line of responding Yep, a very insulting question if you're a supporter and a perfect straw man question for them to answer.

Man City -2 Arsenal Chelsea Cardiff Colchester Port Vale

Not really interested, actions speak louder than words and they fucked us over.

http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2011/sep/07/la-liga-barcelona-real-madrid?cat=football&type=article

Nobody can argue with the points tally so far but equally nobody can say we're playing well. We're creating little, the 'new system' simply doesn't exist and Tim Krul is the only reason we have the points we have and the only reason we're still in the cup.