Teasy

Well Bassedas was capped 26 times and a regular in the mid 90`s with the Argentina national squad But I agree about Colo, can`t believe some people are doubting him.....really think he`ll turn out to be a top buy and prove the doubters wrong once we have some stability on and off the field There's a big difference between being a current international and a past international though. Bassedas hadn't played for Argentina for a full year before he signed for us.

Of course it matters, one situation is a Football club being able to spend because they generate big money from being am extremely successful Football club. The other is a club who are able to spend simply because some bloke decided he fancied playing Football manager in real life. One is the way it should be, the other will destroy the game completely. I'm not saying I like Man Utd, I think they're a bunch of spoilt cunts and I think there is bias towards them from all corners in the game. However I don't think anyone has a leg to stand on when complaining about them spending the money they make from their own success.. Both are several hundred million pounds in debt so, regardless of how they got there, it's hard to argue that "One is the way it should be". Its not hard to argue, its quite easy really. What's hard to argue is that these two clubs are in anywhere near similar situations. Manure are in debt because the Glazers put them in debt to finance their takeover, its also sustainable within the finances of the club. Chelsea are in debt because they couldn't afford the players they bought, or their wages. They're also in debt to a point where they would have had to fold 10 times over if not for Abramovich. Manure are a club who can spend big because they're successful. Chelsea are a club who have had insane amounts of money spent for them to make them successful.. If anyone out there can't see the difference there then.. well I'd be speechless.

Did i say they were new quotes no,i highlighted the bits i found relevent. Yeah ok

Those are two day old quotes: http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=56245.msg1530925#msg1530925

That is media spin and selective quoting of the Keith Harris interview. It doesn't say Keegan will be back and it doesn't say he won't be. Why should whoever is trying to buy the club mention who they want as manager? Newcastle and Keegan are totally separate. It's not as if Ashley could guarantee Keegan would return. I'd be worried about a buyer who only wanted NUFC if they could get Keegan back. Spot on. Well lets bookmark this and see what happens ,probably be a load of horse shit until this quote is verified .Imho i think we should start from scratch and not get lost in sentimentality . The quotes are real, they just don't say what the headline or story suggests that's all. Its typical tabloid crap turning a nothing quote into news by twisting its meaning.

That's incorrect. If they'd all been available we'd have been talking about what good business £12m was. The problem is, we didn't bring in enough players to pad out our squad, so we are missing him, no doubt. In order for us to "miss him", he must be a better player then what we currently have. On the fact that Geremi had more assists than he did last season, and has at least a semblance of understanding with Owen (in delivering free kicks and crossses), no we don't miss him at all. According to ESPN, in 3 seasons with 89 starts + 8 sub appearances, Gutiérrez had 5 goals and 8 assists with Mallorca, that's less than 2 goals and 3 assists per season. I guess we haven't been missing him either and should stick with Geremi? We should also be looking to sell him on in January if we can make a decent profit. I'd call £8 million a decent profit on Milner, £12 million is a lot more than decent.

Its definitely nowhere near as bad as losing hard cash, but its still a big deal, whether his representatives admit it or not.

Looking at the stats Abramovich was worth £13.6 billion in March of this year. Now he's worth £1.6 billion! He must be crying into his cornflakes As people have said though, his is the kind of wealth that will come back eventually, only question is when.

ironically the premiership is experiencing a huge boom due to the TV money so it will take a couple of years, when tv rights are renegotiated, to see if this has any effect. crowds might fall a bit but this is less important than ever. That safeguards most clubs since most of them spend based on revenue, however for the likes of Chelsea its more important that there owner is ok financially then whether Sky keep paying the same for TV rights. Unfortunately for us Abramovich can still afford to keep Chelsea afloat despite losing nearly 90% of his wealth! Though hopefully it will force Chelsea to live somewhere closer to there means for a while.

If he has only loaned the money and expects that loan to stand after the club is sold then no wonder nobody's prepared to pay £280, the clubs barely worth half that with the debt still remaining. Especially since there's no way he'll allow it to stay interest free once he's gone. He surely has to include the money he loaned in the sale price, nobody will buy otherwise.

Of course it matters, one situation is a Football club being able to spend because they generate big money from being am extremely successful Football club. The other is a club who are able to spend simply because some bloke decided he fancied playing Football manager in real life. One is the way it should be, the other will destroy the game completely. I'm not saying I like Man Utd, I think they're a bunch of spoilt cunts and I think there is bias towards them from all corners in the game. However I don't think anyone has a leg to stand on when complaining about them spending the money they make from their own success..

That's my worry - if people like Martins say that they aren't happy, I wouldn't be surprised if Ashley just said okay well off you go then. He'd tell them to stay until the new owner is in, he gains nothing from selling players, it just devalues his asset and risks relegation which would effectively destroy his investment completely.

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/sport/football/article43031.ece As if he's going to try to sell players to cut costs when the clubs up for sale News of the world, where logic and sense go to die.

I wouldn't say that's a bargain actually. Considering they're £110 million in debt losing £20 million a season and will soon have to pay out around £30 million because of Tevez.

We certainly don't know exactly what everyone's role was, especially in Wise's case. However we know that Jimenez was not a scout, its just that the Journal and Gazzette haven't got a clue what they're talking about, big news there then.

I know he's good, but can he play on both wings?! He can do it! Maetihs saw him do it in that DVD he had!

Anyone know which paper they're referring too?

Nail on the head. Who do the idiots found us our best signings of the summer? FFS man, Keegans way too loved in these parts. Coloccini was hardly a "find". I'm not saying he's s****, just that he was already well known and often linked with a move to England. Jonas could be a decent legacy of Jimenez, but one decent find doesn't make the guy a transfer guru. He didn't find anyone! For the last time Jimenez was not a scout and has little knowledge of players, he's a deal closer, a negotiator. Fine then he helped secure our best players this summer. So who found us these players? He also helped us miss out on a hell of a lot of players, Jeff Vetere is the person mainly responsible for finding our players. I assume you mean Modric. Who else? I could name specific players like Modric, Aimar, Warnock but I'm sure there were quite a few more. Didn't say it was all his fault BTW, it would be silly to blame him for every player we missed out on. Just saying that if people are going to give him credit for the players we signed then he's also partially responsible for the ones we missed out on.

Where's the evidence that this guy knew what he was doing? The man was brought in to do the job he's been doing for years, to get us contact with clubs around the world for players around the world and get them signed. It was a well known fact before he came to us he had the names of all the important people in football and could call upon most. He was a powerful agent. Yeah he's no scout and wouldn't be able to pick out a player but I've no doubt he could get them to sign and sign for a decent deal. It's what agents do best. I know what he's supposed to do and I've heard all the "big contacts" stuff, which isn't a fact actually but its neither here nor there. To be clear I haven't claimed Jimenez has done a bad job, who knows why we failed to sign certain players, might have been his fault, might have been other issues out of his control. What I am saying is that I see no real evidence to suggest that him going is any real loss. I've been impressed with some of the signings we've made, but I credit Vetere for most of those.

Nail on the head. Who do the idiots found us our best signings of the summer? FFS man, Keegans way too loved in these parts. Coloccini was hardly a "find". I'm not saying he's s****, just that he was already well known and often linked with a move to England. Jonas could be a decent legacy of Jimenez, but one decent find doesn't make the guy a transfer guru. He didn't find anyone! For the last time Jimenez was not a scout and has little knowledge of players, he's a deal closer, a negotiator. Fine then he helped secure our best players this summer. So who found us these players? He also helped us miss out on a hell of a lot of players, Jeff Vetere is the person mainly responsible for finding our players.

I was actually looking for the post regarding the club meeting fans representatives, as I'd been thinking how that had been short-lived and now instead of meeting with fans to hear their points of view and concerns they have a lynch mob masquerading as an official supporters club. How the f*** does all matters relating to the first team not include making the final decision on what first team players to sign though? Wise can assist as much as he likes with recruiting the players but the manager should have been selecting the players to recruit IMO. So you mean to so Keegan had no say whatsoever on player recruitment? He either did or he didnt, theres no grey area in this becasue Keegans principles are so strong, right? Er no I don't mean that, the fact that I didn't say that should have tipped you off. I'm saying that being responsible for all matters relating to the first team means having full control over everything that relates to the first team, including deciding on which first team players to sign. How can you be held responsible for something you're not given full control over?

Nail on the head. Who do the idiots found us our best signings of the summer? FFS man, Keegans way too loved in these parts. Coloccini was hardly a "find". I'm not saying he's shite, just that he was already well known and often linked with a move to England. Jonas could be a decent legacy of Jimenez, but one decent find doesn't make the guy a transfer guru. He didn't find anyone! For the last time Jimenez was not a scout and has little knowledge of players, he's a deal closer, a negotiator.

But nobody's claiming they know exactly what he did on a case by case basis are they? I assumed you must have meant the opinion on his general duties at the club. With some claiming he spotted players, when in fact his job was to complete transfers.

We should offer him a lump sum that comes to a significant portion of the remainder of his contract, hopefully he'll take it and fuck off, and not a moment too soon.

We do know what he did, for the last time he was there as a negotiator to complete transfers.