

SAK
Member-
Posts
3,623 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by SAK
-
That Redcafe forum is full of idiots. We don’t give a shit about Ashworth, they can have him but must pay what we want, simple. This is all caused by them tapping him up, getting him to reveal confidential information, not dealing with us directly, getting him to hand in his notice thinking they’d use confidential information to lowball us and apparently we’re the ones causing the problem. As if we should roll over after all of that and take the pittance they’re offering, fuck right off. They’re making up bullshit on that forum as cope mechanism but if what’s reported is true we’ve got Ashworth, Berrada, Ineos, and Manu U by the short and curly’s.
-
Not a legal expert but that falls under the section heading of “Employment of officials”. In other parts of section J it mentions officials except in J3. Could it not be argued that J3 is meant to cover officials which I would take to be directors?
-
I want the ownership to stick it up Man U to be honest, go after them for tapping up Ashworth, injunction to get disclosure on emails sent from Man U and Ineos accounts, complaint to the premier league for tapping up to get them a ban, fine, points deduction. Really fuck their shit up. i don’t want the compensation and a hush hush agreement between clubs, let’s expose them properly.
-
Don’t think this cunt has a leg to stand on. Was negotiating behind our backs, Man U didn’t seek our permission to talk to him, he accepted the Man U job a week before the claim that Howe’s comments made his position untenable thus a proven liar, states he was fired yet he still accepts a salary.
-
-
They became owners by default because Suning didn’t repay a loan on time to them. They may keep them or flip them to get their money back so this really doesn’t mean anything. The owners have said in the past NUFC is their priority so don’t think there’s anything to be concerned about still.
-
-
Redcafe thread made me laugh, the numpties thought it’s illegal for an employer to access work emails on a company server and that as Berrada was on gardening leave he wasn’t working for them ( oh yeah he was offering jobs at Man U without their knowledge ?).
-
FA cup game coming which we need them to lose, create a distraction before a big game. Though pro footballers shouldn’t be affected by stuff like this so I’m probably guessing wrong.
-
Despite all the injuries, Tonali suspension, lack of squad depth, FFP restrictions, restrictions to try to stop us (Related party loan ban during January window), we did really well. Exited as we’re a few players away from being an elite team (right winger, Isak backup, attacking mid, centre back, GK). Hopefully we can do some good business in the window.
-
City ain’t letting Man U of all teams have the FA cup.
-
Isn’t conference if Man U win the cup?
-
Please Isak score.
-
Don’t trust us to keep this score for the next 20.
-
We need to score one.
-
Don't collapse please.
-
Are you required to select four keepers or can you reduce to three and have an extra outfield player? edit: Just saw French squad and they have three, question answered.
-
£55-60m is fair price for him.
-
Please this, don’t want LFC to receive a fee that helps them reinvest.
-
Fair market only comes in to it I think if it is a related party which I would take to mean an organisation that is significantly controlled by the same people. If it’s a third party who just has business dealings I don’t think it applies. Will let others more knowledge correct if wrong.