Theregulars

A round

Fuckin love it me

I’m not crying, you’re crying

I thought it was a foul but Arsenal have benefitted from not being called on executing that foul all season.

Ok that’s good, sounds like not farfetched to think he can turn it around

Remind me what he did? It’s heartening that there is recent precedent.

Are there any precedents for a manager coming back stronger after such a bad regression? Genuine question, don’t know enough about football.

Same old story, failure to score second goal costs us. We are fragile AF mentally.

Nohamed Salad

Massivemo Macaroni

Patrik Hamberger

Son Heung butter Mints

Josh Burger King

Bye Felicia

We did, we were forced to sell him due to arbitrary and cartel-protective rules.

Why no red

Going to be some pitchforks sharpened on here

Speaking German

He's just upset you lot won the Europa League in the battle of the shitcrips.

I’m completely behind Howe being very reluctant to let Isak go, not least given that we’ve seen we’re largely dogshit without him.

Worked for Isak like

My injury crisis is bigger than your injury crisis! Spurs’ undoubtedly is the worst, mind. They’ve been missing 11 players for 2 seasons.

I’m not completely sure you understand the word “equivalent”. Did one part of the golf course get injured during construction? Were the first 10 sites they identified too expensive, or did they want to be in London?

No, I’m literally just complaining that your argument is illogical. You say something is better when actually in effect and outcome it is no different. I said in a post that many of us agree there are things with Howe which aren’t working, and yes his seemingly pre-formulated ideas on substitutions leave questions. But to say that Farke had done the opposite and got a better outcome is anti-factual. Here’s a question for you: would you rather have Farke, or Howe? You have no idea what I think or advocate because you only have room for your own opinion.

Not really. Let’s run you through it champ: 1. you complain that Howe lacks proactivity. 2. You cite that lack of proactivity as a reason for losing games. 3. You make what you intend to be a positive comparison to Farke, who you say is proactive. 4. That proactivity did not change the score of the game. 5. The precise same thing that happened to Leeds (playing well and losing, despite proactivity) happened to Newcastle yesterday (playing well and losing, despite what you say is reactivity). 6. the two methods achieved the same outcome: defeat despite playing well and a clear “should have scored” moment. Nobody really disagrees with you that Howe might consider changing approach, but the comparison you use to make him look bad doesn’t work. Nor is anybody saying Howe has done a good job this season, really. It’s just that you make crap arguments in an irritating way. In the direct battle of Farke v Howe and proactivity v reactivity, Howe has 4 points from the season’s 2 fixtures and Farke 1. You state your crap arguments with a real confidence that has no place in reality.