TRon

Exactly. As I said previously Martins goals against Tottenham and Blackburn are clear examples. No other striker on our books has that kind of threat, but whatever, lets just convince ourselves he's a neanderthal incapable of dressing himself in the morning. Knowing our rotten luck, the Martins abusers will soon get their wish when he gets injured, then we can all sit back and take in this Owen and Viduka partnership they all crave. Problem is this the year 2008 and not 2000. The ineffectiveness of the partnership would be a shock to the system for you all. could say owens two goals were an example of his movement and nouse that martins doesn't have. You could also say that Owen's two goals were a result of the pace and movement Martins and Jonas possess but Owen doesn't. i'd say both goals were as a result of all those things. myself i thought owen was pretty shifty for the second goal,look where he is when martins gets the ball. i also think,as i've seen it too often,if the positions were reversed martins would have used his pace to go near post,making it much harder to get anything out of the situation. espesh on the first goal it was the movement that lead the way for the pass. Not sure what you are trying to prove here. If the roles were reversed Owen wouldn't have been able to beat the man out wide to deliver the ball like Martins did. Come on! what you on about,first off it's andy griffin he's up against and he doesn't get passed him. did you have another look at owens movement for the first goal. i've never seen martins be that clever. That's because he isn't that clever, he doesn't have the poacher's instinct that Owen has, by the same token, Owen doesn't have the athleticism or explosive speed that Martins has. Unfortunately we only get pure thoroughbreds on their way down, like Butt, Viduka, Owen and probably plenty more through the years. Put them all into the same team and it's Oscar De Lahoya on a football pitch. The class is still there but the legs aren't.

Exactly. As I said previously Martins goals against Tottenham and Blackburn are clear examples. No other striker on our books has that kind of threat, but whatever, lets just convince ourselves he's a neanderthal incapable of dressing himself in the morning. Knowing our rotten luck, the Martins abusers will soon get their wish when he gets injured, then we can all sit back and take in this Owen and Viduka partnership they all crave. Problem is this the year 2008 and not 2000. The ineffectiveness of the partnership would be a shock to the system for you all. could say owens two goals were an example of his movement and nouse that martins doesn't have. You could also say that Owen's two goals were a result of the pace and movement Martins and Jonas possess but Owen doesn't.

Couldn't have said it better. What some people don't seem to realise is, that's it not a case of adoration with Martins, we can all see he's thick, just as we can see that Zog runs into blind alleys. But take them away and you are left with slow, rusty players who bring us to a crawl. I can remember Dalglish building a side which had players like Hamman, Lee, Speed and Shearer, but when he got rid of the flair players with pace like Ginola and Asprilla, the players we were left with were relaiable but blunt instruments. It might well be possible to play Viduka and Owen up front, but not IMO if you are defending on the back foot with eight men back.

Again, that's just looking at it from a purely stats point of view. The reason we are conceding late goals against Wigan, Sunderland, Fulham and now Stoke ( all s*** sides btw) is because we are sitting back on our lead, dropping deeper and deeper allowing the opposition to overwhelm us. There's nothing wrong with sitting back and then countering fast on the break, but if we take our quicker players like Martins off, we don't have any real threat on the counter. We are actually playing very brainless football in these situations. A single player, Fuller was allowed to single handedly devastate us on our own ground. He wasn't dealt with in 45 mins, we were too busy giving ourselves problems by switching players from defence to midfield and generally panicking rather than controlling the game through possession. it's not really when the goals are conceded as much as when do we get pushed back and haven't got a clue how to get out. thats happened when martins has been both on and off the pitch. you could counter the "needing a fast player to counter attack" with the "of our three front line centre forwards he is the least likely to hold it up and take pressure of the defending" I think that's already been covered with the observation that when he's replaced b y Viduka the defenders move 10 yards up the field because they know that they won't be caught on the break if they push up for offside. i don't see that as martins isn't exactly a whizz at beating the offside trap and it leaves more of a gap in behind the defence for him to play the ball into,which he is more likely to do than martins and owen is more likely to read. have to be honest and say i haven't noticed any teams defences push up more because of any tactical change rather than pushing up more as the game goes on through a necessity to get back into the game. It's been a long tinme since I've seen Owen run onto a through ball from midfield and scoring on the break. He used to do it at Liverpool. Whether teams push up by design or not when Martins goes off, it must make it easier to do that when you know you have a better chance of catching the forward if he is picked out on the break. If I was setting a team up to soak up pressure then hit on the break I'd prefer to have a quick striker on the shoulder of the last defender.

Quite clear that JK gave it no proper thought and is just picking the squad by numbers. A similar lack of understanding or tactical nous was responsible for the poor substitutions and failure to deal with Fuller who was allowed to run riot for 45 mins while Kinnear sat frozen like a tub of ice cream in his dugout. Is that like painting by numbers? It's done by childish minds so I suppose the answer is yes.

The problem now is that we are needing away wins because we are dropping points at home, and I don't think we have the confidence to close out a win in a game like this. We might get another draw.

Again, that's just looking at it from a purely stats point of view. The reason we are conceding late goals against Wigan, Sunderland, Fulham and now Stoke ( all s*** sides btw) is because we are sitting back on our lead, dropping deeper and deeper allowing the opposition to overwhelm us. There's nothing wrong with sitting back and then countering fast on the break, but if we take our quicker players like Martins off, we don't have any real threat on the counter. We are actually playing very brainless football in these situations. A single player, Fuller was allowed to single handedly devastate us on our own ground. He wasn't dealt with in 45 mins, we were too busy giving ourselves problems by switching players from defence to midfield and generally panicking rather than controlling the game through possession. it's not really when the goals are conceded as much as when do we get pushed back and haven't got a clue how to get out. thats happened when martins has been both on and off the pitch. you could counter the "needing a fast player to counter attack" with the "of our three front line centre forwards he is the least likely to hold it up and take pressure of the defending" I think that's already been covered with the observation that when he's replaced b y Viduka the defenders move 10 yards up the field because they know that they won't be caught on the break if they push up for offside.

Quite clear that JK gave it no proper thought and is just picking the squad by numbers. A similar lack of understanding or tactical nous was responsible for the poor substitutions and failure to deal with Fuller who was allowed to run riot for 45 mins while Kinnear sat frozen like a tub of ice cream in his dugout.

Again, that's just looking at it from a purely stats point of view. The reason we are conceding late goals against Wigan, Sunderland, Fulham and now Stoke ( all shit sides btw) is because we are sitting back on our lead, dropping deeper and deeper allowing the opposition to overwhelm us. There's nothing wrong with sitting back and then countering fast on the break, but if we take our quicker players like Martins off, we don't have any real threat on the counter. We are actually playing very brainless football in these situations. A single player, Fuller was allowed to single handedly devastate us on our own ground. He wasn't dealt with in 45 mins, we were too busy giving ourselves problems by switching players from defence to midfield and generally panicking rather than controlling the game through possession.

I doubt Joe will ever have the balls to play all three away from home. Shame because I seem to remember destroying Spurs at White Hart Lane, whereas this time we'll probably be turning cartwheels if we get 0-0 with 10 men behind the ball, and martins on the bench.

What good is that though when that said striker can't keep the ball with his pace. If we were talking about Bellamy, or even Dyer, I'd totally agree, because they could run and keep the ball, giving it to a team mate more often than not, Martins isn't like that imo. I have no problem whatsoever with Owen & Viduka up top at any particular time. It's good in that it forces the opposition to sit much deeper and commit less men forward? Oba's scored at least two goals for us by running the entire length of the field in the late stages against opposition trying to get into the game. I'd reckon we've scored more late goals from an Owen header or tap-in mind. We've had 3 this season alone. I'm as critical as any against Kinnear, but I don't think Kinnear is the only manager who'd be making the Viduka for Martins substitution. All the decent teams in the premier have pace throughout their side so they could afford to sub Martins. I know if we are up against a side with quick forwards I'm usually bricking it if we go a goal behind because of the danger of getting caught on the break. On Saturday after going two goals up, if we'd went about it the right way we should have scored at least another two with Martins, Zog, Owen and Jonas in the side. Utter waste.

It's at times like this I look back and think how lucky we were to have a manager like KK last season who's only instinct was to go for the jugular and blow the opposition out of the water. Home or away. Have some of this you bastards I don't even say that as a Keegan worshipper, he had his faults, but letting shit teams walk away with points from St James wasn't one of them.

Martins has the threat of breaking at pace which always keeps teams on their toes. I've never seen it used more effectively at Newcastle than when Bobby Robson put that side together with Bellamy, Robert and Dyer. With Solano picking the ball up from defence and picking one of them out, we could be down the other end of the pitch with the ball in the back of the net before the opposition had turned round to run in the other direction.

That was obviously Plan A with the club getting sold which fell flat. To be fair to Kinnear, he's had some good results against City and Villa, and we've looked more organised defensively, but it's a double edged sword. We are giving far too much respect to the poorer teams, and allowing them to come at us once we are ahead. The attitude should be "right..you're shit and you're at St James. Prepare to be hammered for 90 mins".

That's the thing I'm worried about tbh; he doesn't seem to be learning. It was fucking obvious Stoke were on top and going to score and what does he do? Take off Martins then Geremi. Fulham, Sunderland and Wigan were all similar games where we took our foot off the gas after scoring, so it's not just bad luck. Personally I am still raging that Stoke were allowed to boss us for the whole second half in front of our own supporters. Can you imagine that happening to Chelsea or Liverpool? It was an absolute disgrace and the manager allowed it to happen. No wonder Kinnear didn't have the balls to face the press after the game.

People keep saying this, but I don't know where it comes from at all. Aye, obviosuly he'd probably rather be playing for Chelsea, but who wouldn't? I suppose we'll find out. I don't think Liverpool or any of the other big 4 will come in for him, but if he gets that sort of move no one can hold it against him. It's more likely he'll end up somewhere else though, like Villa maybe. It won't be because he's not loved enough by the fans though, it will be because he thinks he can do better.

What do you want us to do...hang garlands round his neck at the airport as he gets into his helicopter on his way out of Newcastle? He doesn't want to be here, hasn't ever really wanted to stay...how is that the fault of the fans?

One of the few posts here that makes sense. Agreed. While JFK can barely pass off as a decent PL manager, we won't do ourselves any good agitating for more instability at this stage. While that's true, I would suggest if Joe's keen to spout off to the press about everything we are doing behind the scenes, the least he could do is turn up at the tv interviews which are paying his wages. Especially when he's the one who has cocked up a result through terrible decisions from squad selections to changes made during the actual match.

He got turned out wide, where he shouldn't have to be in the first place tbh. Not the biggest crime, at least he was there rather than going missing like our midfield.

Barton would be the obvious choice if he wasn't a head case. I would still consider him the front runner in the hope that the extra responsibility would see him grow into the role...and hopefully grow up in the process. If not, then Beye's the obvious choice. It wasn't a coincidence that when he was removed from the back four we fell apart today. He has all the right qualities, as a player and a role model. He's also pretty vocal for a foreigner.

What a pass from Oba. Glad we didn't attack with these useless buggers second half, we could easily have thrown it away. nowt about the movement from the bloke who received the passes ? Owen's never been my favourite player at Newcastle, mainly because I think it's only daft money which is keeping him here, but the movement for his two goals, especially the second, was top class. The finish for the first was sublime as well.

The goal posts have been moved since then. He was only supposed to have been here for 6 weeks at the time and now he's got the job until the end of the season which is a different kettle of fish. What annoys me so much about today is that we had the right team to start the match for the first time in ages and now because we didn't win it'll be back to Duff and Butt all because the substitutions were cocked up royally, not because the players didn't perform when they were given the chance.

I don't think there's anything we can do to make Owen sign a new contract other than offer him so much money he just can't turn it down. Even then I think he'll wait till the summer to see if anyone else comes in.

Well done, Joe. You can put two wingers and two strikers on the field, and make them play as two wingers and two strikers against the mighty Stoke. Bravo. Kinnear had so many better options to replace Guthrie. He could have shifted Colo there or moved Zog into the centre as he's played there before. Putting Beye into midfield was a disastrous decision at the end of the day.

Kinnear's teams are regularly coming under pressure as soon as we take the lead. He is doing an Allardyce and it's absolutely spot on that Keegan would never have allowed a team like Stoke to come to our ground and dominate us for the second half like they did. It's happening too often to be put down to one injury to Guthrie as well.