bovineblue

Feel free to elaborate.

I was saying this to the misses today. I`ve been thinking since it all happened "poor Keegan" . After todays defeat ( Everyone knows we wouldnt have lost if he had been here) I have changed my mind. I have been stuck in jobs before where I hated every second of it but I stayed in it for the money for my wife and kids, basically people around that I care about more than my feelings. Also didn`t Martin Jol stick in his job regardless of how s*** he was treated over the Ramos thing ( might be wrong I smoke a lot of weed and have a bad memory) I`m pretty sure other managers have stuck at their job for the team despite not getting on with the board. You want a manager who doesn't want to manage and lacks integrity?

He's lacking fitness. He's used to running across a computer monitor, not a football pitch which is obviously much bigger. He therefore looks a lot slower and gets tired. Quite obvious when you think about it.

Why ? What's the reasons behind this ? I thought the hopes of any takeover were dashed ? All an Ashley & Kev scam. Not enough money for Kev's dream team so he faked leaving and Ashley has bunged all the milner money on him coming back.

Already have one. It's called the press.

Because this time we had a manager that cared about the club and actually resigned over the issue instead of waiting for a big fat payout. He also seemed to be taking the club in the right direction.

Where has it come out that KK wanted Lampard, Beckham etc? The club insider of course.

It had looked like there was some good work being done with the youth setup.

Like communism. Sounds good in theory but is almost unworkable in reality.

Short season like.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/soccer/safran-helps-lift-curse-of-the-socceroos/2005/11/19/1132017027452.html Could be something in all this.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/newcastle/article4678988.ece So, if this is true. What the hell should the owner and board have done then? Everyone has so far assumed that Keegan wasn't making unrealistic demands as far as targets go, well it turns out this might not have been the case, which is what I suspected to be honest. The owner clearly wanted a team of younger emerging players, and said this from the outset. What options did he have if Keegan then came in and started asking for these types? Discuss. This must have been going on for ages it look slike, as we all remember the Henry quotes! I am shocked they didn't part ways much earlier as they clearly should have. It's no wonder we had been linked with Marcelino so far back then, as the club was probably already making contingency plans. Absolute madness from both sides. More newspaper shite.

But if they do you're free to leave them to rot in the reserves. Starting to feel a bit let down by Keegan now. I'll keep you all posted on my constantly changing moods. But why should a player who hasn't done anything wrong suffer?

Stop talking sense man.

What's with all the Kev bashing? He's always seemed like a decent bloke. This is echoed by those who actually know the man.

Because they are right on both counts?

What Ashley boosts his sale price by allowing the new owners to become heroes by hiring back Keegan?

Cheered me up.

But aren't they all in a meeting?

Half a Milner? Hope not.

I can think of a third. He falls under the classification of 'living statue.'

ZOMG Wenger tapping up Ranger!!!! :frantic: :frantic:

His only weakness is women. Let's hope his weakness is women and not men dressed like women as with a certain Ronaldo.

2 -1 to them. We play better than expected and lose to an unlucky goal after 37 minutes of injury time.

Sadly the best looking 'ladies' they could find. Obviously the reason why their team is so shite, all those beautiful 'women' in the crowd is distracting their 'players'.