SEMTEX

Maybe he can re-sign Kleberson. This. Ferguson isn't very good in the transfer market IMO, he's bought more **** than most over the years and at high prices. Veron anyone? Fair point, I just think there's been an overreaction to the imminent departure of Ronaldo. Important player but certainly not irreplaceable. I also think people will be surprised by how well Nani and Anderson will do this year both players have the potential to be excellent. As well as a crop of good youngsters, Macheda, Wellbeck, Frazer Campbell etc. Anderson agree, Nani disagree.

Maybe he can re-sign Kleberson.

What an absolute fucking cunt.

Yeah mate, left and right wing free at the moment. woah nelly our 'left and right wing' don't really exist. they're more like CM positions.

Shouldn't have called themselves Ultras. I know you don't want the jibes etc, but it immediately made people cautious of associating with you. I reckon if that hadn't happened, you'd have a much greater populous. Anyway, that aside, I love the atmosphere in L7 around Ultraville. So much so that I would much prefer to sit there than sit milburn centre etc. Whats the point in having the best view in the world if I cant call the ref a cunt every 3 seconds without feeling self conscious.

He must hate alot of ex-Bayern managers then

I think they do, as I talked to a mackem when canceling mine a year ago, saying they had no more NUFC games left or something. He made some jibe I believe.

How on earth would they afford it though, if their only income is through advertising? It surely will go to a new subscription-only channel or someone huge enough to buy it just to increase their profile, like ESPN. Apparently someone said Living TV are the favourites, I think they are on freeview? I heard they've pulled their interest as they've got all their funding tied to a new Jade Goody reality show. (a.k.a. I was joking when I said LivingTV were front runners you retard )

Stick a fork in Setanta, they're fucked. imotbh

"Monopoly" article shite - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4352160.stm

Nope. They are not allowed to have all the games. Someone else will have to bid. LivingTV are front runners. Love the fact you've just used the word nope where it clearly isn't applicable. I was either going to go with Setanta alone as I have now, or Sky and Setanta on account of the latter having the boxing Sky and Setanta it is I didn't detect the sarcasm is all. I assumed you were actually happy as rather than getting sky sports AND setanta, you just needed the sky sports package.

Nope. They are not allowed to have all the games. Someone else will have to bid. LivingTV are front runners. They have had all of them before Setanta so why not now? The entire reason Setanta got games was because they changed the law. It is seen as a Monopoly. It is to be fairer to US I know, its fucking dogshit, but thats tha law!

However, I'm SURE Setanta only won 1 package this year and would've only had 23 games, rather than 46. God damn sure of it. That article is blataz wrong. Edit: further research says that this is from 2010 season onwards. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7875478.stm

Nope. They are not allowed to have all the games. Someone else will have to bid. LivingTV are front runners.

funeral march http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8109954.stm

because it would cost more money to do. How so? They have reams and reams of black and white material for the main body of the kit, just means they have to cut more of it slightly differently and buy less plain white for the patch. ugh. because 1 process = cheaper than 2 processes.

because it would cost more money to do.

Big silly dark patch > big silly white patch. The patch could be made of gold plated blow jobs and people would still fucking moan.

OMGZ ITS GOT A MASSIVE BLUE PATCH ON THE BACK, MIKE ASHLEY JUST WANTS THE MONEYS. FUCK YOU. we want shepherd back.

http://maps.google.com/maps?q=55.0092,-1.572442&t=h&sll=55.009243,-1.571957&sspn=0.001258,0.003742&hl=en&ie=UTF8&ll=55.009243,-1.571957&spn=0.001258,0.003742&z=19 It's those pitches right there.

We're talking about Transfer policy which is why i brought it up. And transfer policy has no relation to winning games of football? Maybe thats why Spurs are shit.

who cares about 'inspirational' signings when you're actually winning games of football? Michael Owen was an inspirational signing ffs.

thats a 442 diamond where im from. I just want to play opposite Dan B , So you decided to play upfront? You're all talk. we'll see touché

thats a 442 diamond where im from. I just want to play opposite Dan B , So you decided to play upfront? You're all talk.

Donations and subscriptions are different kettle's o-fish. People LOVE to feel good about themselves by voluntarily donating, where as people do not love being forced to pay for something. Even if it is something they often use. People are stupid.