lovejoy

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. i agree it was cowardly in a sense and i'd have gone for aarons but tbf he's trying to build something in his 3rd game in charge and coming away with a point from OT is a good result if we'd conceded then aye, shot with s***, but apparently he's not pardew if we'd brought aarons on and we'd conceded he'd have been shot with s*** for not closing the game off. cant win. cracking point from a far more organised and resilient side, starts and ends there for me. And he'd have been a hero if Aarons scored the winner, it's all hypothetical. It would have been far worse had we conceded due to sitting back and allowing Man Utd the ball though. personally can't argue with much except f***ing obertan, he got it right and we take a point when this period of dodgy games is over though i will :lol:or he can f*** himself aye. this taking points at unbelievably difficult places has to f*** clean off. f*** you on about? why are people acting like in game decisions don't matter? at 60 minutes in the thread we were screaming for change and he waited when they were all over us, when he put tiote on they were all over us and had no attacking outlet he chose to go more defensive and got away with it, it's not such a ludicrous proposition to suggest he should have attacked regardless of how it turned out read my post, i should have highlighted the point i was talking about, but it isn't that hard to understand what I mean tbh. your point appears to be we got a point so it's all ok? perhaps i'm misreading it my point is we got a great point, which nobody saw coming, to call him cowardly as f*** for protecting that point is negativity in the extreme. He'd have got f***ing pelters if he'd gone for the game and got beat. I take the 'hypothetical' point made, so lets focus on the facts instead, he got a great point. We looked very very well organised, for the first time in god knows how long. We'll be here all day if we keep going on about it though, so lets agree to disagree. agreed, was a class point mind...did not expect it, he's now only 1 point away from where he should be if he hadn't made such f***ing terrible personnel decisions in the first two games that's it, lets go again...... f***ing kidding me? he got so much wrong in the first 2 games it's actually sad I am aye.

well I certainly didn't. what was your prediction out of interest? I had a 10er on us to win. why when our manager is so shit?

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. i agree it was cowardly in a sense and i'd have gone for aarons but tbf he's trying to build something in his 3rd game in charge and coming away with a point from OT is a good result if we'd conceded then aye, shot with s***, but apparently he's not pardew if we'd brought aarons on and we'd conceded he'd have been shot with s*** for not closing the game off. cant win. cracking point from a far more organised and resilient side, starts and ends there for me. And he'd have been a hero if Aarons scored the winner, it's all hypothetical. It would have been far worse had we conceded due to sitting back and allowing Man Utd the ball though. personally can't argue with much except f***ing obertan, he got it right and we take a point when this period of dodgy games is over though i will :lol:or he can f*** himself aye. this taking points at unbelievably difficult places has to f*** clean off. f*** you on about? why are people acting like in game decisions don't matter? at 60 minutes in the thread we were screaming for change and he waited when they were all over us, when he put tiote on they were all over us and had no attacking outlet he chose to go more defensive and got away with it, it's not such a ludicrous proposition to suggest he should have attacked regardless of how it turned out read my post, i should have highlighted the point i was talking about, but it isn't that hard to understand what I mean tbh. your point appears to be we got a point so it's all ok? perhaps i'm misreading it my point is we got a great point, which nobody saw coming, to call him cowardly as f*** for protecting that point is negativity in the extreme. He'd have got f***ing pelters if he'd gone for the game and got beat. I take the 'hypothetical' point made, so lets focus on the facts instead, he got a great point. We looked very very well organised, for the first time in god knows how long. We'll be here all day if we keep going on about it though, so lets agree to disagree. agreed, was a class point mind...did not expect it, he's now only 1 point away from where he should be if he hadn't made such f***ing terrible personnel decisions in the first two games that's it, lets go again......

well I certainly didn't. what was your prediction out of interest?

class today.

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. i agree it was cowardly in a sense and i'd have gone for aarons but tbf he's trying to build something in his 3rd game in charge and coming away with a point from OT is a good result if we'd conceded then aye, shot with s***, but apparently he's not pardew if we'd brought aarons on and we'd conceded he'd have been shot with s*** for not closing the game off. cant win. cracking point from a far more organised and resilient side, starts and ends there for me. And he'd have been a hero if Aarons scored the winner, it's all hypothetical. It would have been far worse had we conceded due to sitting back and allowing Man Utd the ball though. personally can't argue with much except f***ing obertan, he got it right and we take a point when this period of dodgy games is over though i will :lol:or he can f*** himself aye. this taking points at unbelievably difficult places has to f*** clean off. f*** you on about? why are people acting like in game decisions don't matter? at 60 minutes in the thread we were screaming for change and he waited when they were all over us, when he put tiote on they were all over us and had no attacking outlet he chose to go more defensive and got away with it, it's not such a ludicrous proposition to suggest he should have attacked regardless of how it turned out read my post, i should have highlighted the point i was talking about, but it isn't that hard to understand what I mean tbh. your point appears to be we got a point so it's all ok? perhaps i'm misreading it my point is we got a great point, which nobody saw coming, to call him cowardly as fuck for protecting that point is negativity in the extreme. He'd have got fucking pelters if he'd gone for the game and got beat. I take the 'hypothetical' point made, so lets focus on the facts instead, he got a great point. We looked very very well organised, for the first time in god knows how long. We'll be here all day if we keep going on about it though, so lets agree to disagree.

class today, so clever.

nowt worse than a player who's thick, shit and heartless. Mcclaren must see something I don't to keep picking him, he's fucking woeful.

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. i agree it was cowardly in a sense and i'd have gone for aarons but tbf he's trying to build something in his 3rd game in charge and coming away with a point from OT is a good result if we'd conceded then aye, shot with s***, but apparently he's not pardew if we'd brought aarons on and we'd conceded he'd have been shot with s*** for not closing the game off. cant win. cracking point from a far more organised and resilient side, starts and ends there for me. And he'd have been a hero if Aarons scored the winner, it's all hypothetical. It would have been far worse had we conceded due to sitting back and allowing Man Utd the ball though. personally can't argue with much except f***ing obertan, he got it right and we take a point when this period of dodgy games is over though i will :lol:or he can f*** himself aye. this taking points at unbelievably difficult places has to f*** clean off. f*** you on about? why are people acting like in game decisions don't matter? at 60 minutes in the thread we were screaming for change and he waited when they were all over us, when he put tiote on they were all over us and had no attacking outlet he chose to go more defensive and got away with it, it's not such a ludicrous proposition to suggest he should have attacked regardless of how it turned out read my post, i should have highlighted the point i was talking about, but it isn't that hard to understand what I mean tbh.

at old trafford? p*ss off man! whatever man, I completly disagree with your attitude. The game was very winnable imo. i completely disagree with yours, so lets agree to disagree.

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. i agree it was cowardly in a sense and i'd have gone for aarons but tbf he's trying to build something in his 3rd game in charge and coming away with a point from OT is a good result if we'd conceded then aye, shot with s***, but apparently he's not pardew if we'd brought aarons on and we'd conceded he'd have been shot with s*** for not closing the game off. cant win. cracking point from a far more organised and resilient side, starts and ends there for me. And he'd have been a hero if Aarons scored the winner, it's all hypothetical. It would have been far worse had we conceded due to sitting back and allowing Man Utd the ball though. you're right, it is all hypothetical, because he got us a cracking point. Christ. i feel exactly the same!

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. i agree it was cowardly in a sense and i'd have gone for aarons but tbf he's trying to build something in his 3rd game in charge and coming away with a point from OT is a good result if we'd conceded then aye, shot with s***, but apparently he's not pardew if we'd brought aarons on and we'd conceded he'd have been shot with s*** for not closing the game off. cant win. cracking point from a far more organised and resilient side, starts and ends there for me. And he'd have been a hero if Aarons scored the winner, it's all hypothetical. It would have been far worse had we conceded due to sitting back and allowing Man Utd the ball though. personally can't argue with much except f***ing obertan, he got it right and we take a point when this period of dodgy games is over though i will :lol:or he can f*** himself aye. this taking points at unbelievably difficult places has to fuck clean off.

at old trafford? piss off man!

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. i agree it was cowardly in a sense and i'd have gone for aarons but tbf he's trying to build something in his 3rd game in charge and coming away with a point from OT is a good result if we'd conceded then aye, shot with s***, but apparently he's not pardew if we'd brought aarons on and we'd conceded he'd have been shot with s*** for not closing the game off. cant win. cracking point from a far more organised and resilient side, starts and ends there for me. And he'd have been a hero if Aarons scored the winner, it's all hypothetical. It would have been far worse had we conceded due to sitting back and allowing Man Utd the ball though. you're right, it is all hypothetical, because he got us a cracking point.

nah man, no need for that, throw aarons on and we could win the game and if we lose the game he gets criticised. he done the right thing. now onwards and upwards.

aye, but tiote de jong and aarons have got to play.

krul mbemba taylor colo haidara anita tiote de jong aarons thauvin mitrovic

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. I like him, I'll admit that. I also dont think shutting up shop at man utd is deserving of the term 'cowardly as f***'. Its a cracking point that, there's just no denying it. We looked well organised, which is a hell of a step forward. I wouldn't go as far as saying Man Utd were there for the taking but I don't think there was much need to batten down the hatches (as Bruce would say) for the final 20 or so. We started to push out near the end and the game opened right up. there wasn't any need to batten down the hatches because he brought tiote on and shut the game off, maybe?

its a must, really.

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. i agree it was cowardly in a sense and i'd have gone for aarons but tbf he's trying to build something in his 3rd game in charge and coming away with a point from OT is a good result if we'd conceded then aye, shot with s***, but apparently he's not pardew if we'd brought aarons on and we'd conceded he'd have been shot with shit for not closing the game off. cant win. cracking point from a far more organised and resilient side, starts and ends there for me.

exactly.

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. I think fitness is still an issue after the s*** preseason we had, Man Utd clearly had more legs than us in the last 15 minutes, was quite happy to see him shore up the midfield and protect the point. yep.

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. I like him, I'll admit that. I also dont think shutting up shop at man utd is deserving of the term 'cowardly as fuck'. Its a cracking point that, there's just no denying it. We looked well organised, which is a hell of a step forward.

Even 5% is way too high tbh. I'd be amazed if 1% could. No chance man.