Mick

A young kid was played out of position by a clueless 50 odd year old and the young kid gets the blame. (not you) We've already seen that Huntingdon isn't good enough if others are fit, Edgar has clearly done better in that position yet Roeder doesn't pick him, Roeder, f*** off. on the basis of how many games? and you want to just chuck him into the biggest game of the season? Huntingdon isn't exactly a seasoned professional, the experience difference isn't or shouldn't be a consideration.

Roeder proves all too often how little he knows about football, qualifications mean very little, he proves that most weeks

A young kid was played out of position by a clueless 50 odd year old and the young kid gets the blame. (not you) We've already seen that Huntingdon isn't good enough if others are fit, Edgar has clearly done better in that position yet Roeder doesn't pick him, Roeder, Fuck off.

Agreed but that hardly helps when he's the one making the appointments, Roeder going will just start the whole cycle off again.

Personally, I wish you were joking. The man is a pile of s****, I hope every penny he owns goes on this venture if he takes it on, if he ends up pennyless I'll have an excuse for a night out, I hate the b****** for what he's done to our club, burning in hell wouldn't do him justice. Personally, I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire.

He's done nothing wrong other than hide that he posts as two different people, I suppose his credability will be shot to pieces a bit if proof was found, check the deleted post thread if you have deleted pm's in it and you'll see that he told me he was LeazesMag, I can't see why he's hiding it other than it might look better if more people share his views. NE5, just admit it and get over it, it's not the end of the world.

Go on then, I'll read it tomorrow at work.

Save it as a word or text file or something then copy and paste it into your browser, have another go.

We should just let this thread die or somebody could try and get it back to the original point, no doubt we can discuss the board in some random thread at a later date.

Was it directly from the club or its solicitors?

Too much to drink last night, nowt to do with his age.

Agreed, it's almost as if saying anything against Shepherd is personal to him. Like it or not but discussing the board is as important as talking about players, they're all links in the chain that is the football club.

And once again you post something that doesn't even come close to resembling the truth, well done Leazes, it is OK to call you that isn't it? By the way, they were the last to win a cup in Europe, something your idol has failed to do for 10 years even though he has had the best tools at his disposal.

Why would anybody remember something that didn't happen? I remember things that others don't remember, it doesn't automatically mean I'm any better than them. I bet you're now going to tell us that you still have the letter that was in with the returned cheque.

I would like to see something like that going back to the old board just so we would know where to point the finger for the state of the club before Sir John turned up. McKeag gets a lot of the blame but I think his hands were probably tied because of what he took over, I'm not saying he would have done better if he'd had a bit more to work with. Stan Seymour tried to do something while he was at the club but didn't have the bottle to push on and take the club up a level, I have no idea how much of this was down to finances but even what he did achieve wouldn't have happened without the brewery putting cash into the club to pay for Keegan. Where did it all go wrong? I guess that we'll never know. I do know that a journalist was going to do a book on the mismanagement of the club, somebody who worked for the Journal or Chronicle, I don't think he ever took it any further than thinking about it. I would love to read a well researched book to get an idea of the decisions reached and what information was used to come to these decisions.

Nice Santa Clause impression above. Getting old, poor memory or just more interesting things to remember. If it was more important then I would have remembered, if it had happened and the money came out of my bank account then I would have remembered, it didn't happen so it was no more than a pledge and the money was spent elsewhere.

I don't think Taylor has progressed at all this season, he needs an old head next to him so that he can learn from them. Campbell or Woodgate would have really helped him if we'd got one of those two in.

I have no doubt at all that he'll read it and agree with it as it just about sums up our current situation.

I've not seen it but the title gives enough of a hint as to what it's about. You're right above though, it is catch 22, damned if we do spend and damned if we don't as we're in such a state, at least we've got the extra money coming in soon from Sky, it's just a pity a lot of it will go towards financing our debt instead of strengthening the playing staff.

Spot on.

He's not a very good advert for reaching 52, I'm shit scared just thinking about my 52nd birthday.

Actually you know I've answered this in the past, I did try to but shares in the club when Sir John wanted to the fans to buy in. The fact that I thought the minimum amount was £500 isn't relevant as it was so long ago. I can't even remember how I applied but it was probably something which was printed in the Chronicle but I wouldn't hold my breath on that being right.

You are LeazesMag, you told me that a long time ago in a pm, we both know the truth and you'll only be fooling yourself if you deny it.