Unbelievable

Good goal

Abeid close

It just sounds like mortal English. Is there any other kind of English?

All these hoofs man

Tiote

Good move, shit finish

Decent move and effort

Dutch Fox 4

Closings in

Blob

Santon. Nah, other side. Ferreyra?

Is he playing, haven't noticed him

Should have passed in Boyd, decent save

Haidara's birthday according to Dutch commentator.

Dummett

We're they not going to go bust till he got involved? From what I read in that article there was funding for 16 million which was scuppered when he got (more) involved, so no, I don't think so, not immediately anyway.

Cabella and especially Anita better start looking for new clubs if they want first team action this season.

Dear God

As long as the interest free nature of the loan/debt is being used as an argument by the club for the non-payment for Sports Direct having been plastered all over SJP I don't think any debt repayment is OK unless the club benefit from it in a tangible way.

Ashley cannot be blamed for our transfer strategy/disaster? I've heard it all now

I watched it 3 times and shared it on FB before I realised it wasnt.

Nobody has suggested he has. He's doing it because it benefits him. The fact it hurts NUFC doesn't come into the equation.

In your opinion, but it would have to be tested and argued. I imagine he would have a few arguments that would point the other way. I'm not sure what uncertainty you think there is in that interpretation. What are some of these arguments you're imagining? Well I can't really second guess what he might argue, but I'm saying it's unlikely to be a fight he gives up without trying. Just off the top of my head, he could argue his influence over the board is marginal and only extended to that one bloke he got into position. He might argue his only interest in Rangers is his commercial retail partnership, he could position himself more as a sponsor/business partner than a controller. There are probably others that a highly-paid legal team could come up with. PS I just enjoy this kind of debate, I'm not saying I agree that Ashley should be allowed to control two clubs. Dear God Ian, these guys don't even want us to qualify for Europe (EL at least). Why would they put up a fight to allow us in when the rules clearly state we wouldn't be allowed?

What decision is there to be made? These are the rules. Same as when a player gets send off, you know he is suspended for the next game(s), or when you lose a cup game you are out of the competition. I think it's more the fact that they said we may never play in Europe again while Ashley is in charge and also that he would pick Rangers above us when there is no proof either way. The thing is Ashley wouldn't get to choose who plays in Europe and who doesn't. Ian's argument of a ruling is also null and void as the rules are perfectly clear. By doing what he is doing Ashley is endangering any chance NUFC have of getting back in Europe. I don't know what's hard to understand about this. The club statement has come about because The Telegraph were 100% correct, not because they were wrong. As always though, some of our fans appear to have fallen for it. Club and fans shortchanged and lied to, Ashley under no pressure due to false propaganda. Mission accomplished.