Andy

Can we use this thread for discussing the rule change and NOT for pointless, inane, and absolutely mundane argumentative drivel please? You know, before I just start randomly deleting people who I can't be fucked with? Getting just a little bit bored of threads being continuously taken off-course of late.

Henry Gale. Benjamin Linus OMG get it right dave, are you stupid or something? :rolleyes:

You can always rely on Andy to treat the users of this forum with utter contempt. That's because you draw contempt out of me like a big fucking magnet of contemptment (Is that a word? It is now), Gemmill.

... And to add to that, THIS thread is still open because there is a fair bit of discussion/controversy over it, and there a valid points and questions being raised.

that thought occurred to me too. ........ and how does this thread not contravene the following : http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=40760.0 so blatant, and childish, it is easy to ignore, and as conflict driven as anything you will find. Not that I'm advocating a ban, because I'm not, just pointing out how impossible to mod that this will be IMO Again, that's why it's moderated with discretion. If we feel a post or thread contravenes our personal definition of this rule, we'll act upon it.

Sorry, I removed the other thread to keep it off the football forum (considering it was a non-football topic). I didn't realise I needed to explain myself on that one, since I wasn't aware that there was any kind of debate over the rule change (apart from a few comments from Gemmill, which are to be expected anyway) - most people seemed to be fine with it from what I could see, so there was no reason to keep the thread going. If you have any concerns regarding the rule, either start a thread in General Chat or PM me. Simple.

For those who still may not be sure, this change only affects those who've received an e-mail from us within the last hour or so.

This needs bumping as well.

Feel free to PM myself or any other Administrator with any questions or complaints you may have regarding this change.

Right, now I can say this with punch: Any cocksucking little FUCKER who post-boosts or spams on my watch will have their puny little account WIPED OUT faster than they can put their hands in their pants to wank themselves off. This is a zero tolerance rule. DO NOT post boost. DO NOT fuck with me. End communication.

I'll be supporting Milan as per usual. Kaka to score twelve in a narrow victory please.

I think this is a decent idea tbh, as long as action IS taken on people who deliberately spam the forum to boost their post count. Someone make me an admin again btw. I don't like being kept in the dark over changes

3 week ban please mods. http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=20035.0 Yeah, my own rules obviously don't apply to myself. However, this link is essentially saying that you think I should be banned. Enjoy your two day break...

3 week ban please mods.

Sorry Chris, was I not supposed to leak that info yet? Better keep quiet about the new no-swearing rule as well then?

I meant from January 06 obviously. Typo.

What about the posters that have recently joined? There will be no exclusions, from what I'm told.

I've heard whispers from sources within the admin room that thread moderation may be returning very, VERY soon; along with General Football and Transfer Talk forums. There's also going to be a purge of any users who either aren't considered to be contributive enough or are considered to be too disruptive, and there will almost certainly be random deletions on all members who have made less than 500 posts since January 07 (due to server load issues). And when I say soon I mean, maybe next week some time... Possibly Tuesday, if I was to just pick any old day at random...

Season ticket holder. Made it to only 3 games this season because of the shitty, crappy BOLLOCKS that is work. Thus I paid approximately £200 a game, which basically makes me the most hardcore superfan in the world ever.

Absolutely.

Another off topic post. BAN HIM (On topic: Shepherd is shit etc.)

Let's see if we can keep this one on topic guys.

Whilst we don't have the full facts yet, we can assume that Shepherd probably requested Roeder to resign because of the following things: * Inability to improve the club's fortunes * Inability to bring in the right men for the job * Lack of support from the fans Perhaps Shepherd should now face the music and turn the same criteria onto himself; because ultimately, it isn't just the managers who have failed to tick the above boxes over the past few seasons...

I hope your castle-based decisions are better than your football-based ones, my king.