Jump to content

Paully

Member
  • Posts

    13,824
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Paully

  1. Finishes just before 3pm then NUFC vs Man Utd full match on NUFC YouTube!
  2. Idiotic decision for me - every league should have been played to a finish - bollocks to next season - start that whenever! If it’s void then are the FA going to reimburse clubs for league fees, bookings, red cards etc?
  3. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-8161907/MARTIN-SAMUEL-Coronavirus-unimaginable-12-months-ago-boom-bust.html
  4. Get in! Football’s coming home as the ITV Hub unearths Euro 96 With Euro 2020 postponed for twelve months, the ITV Hub has raided its archives to provide football fans with a slice of sports nostalgia as the platform unearths every match from Euro 96. Airing from May, ITV Hub takes a trip down sporting memory lane and will air all 31 games from one of the most closely contested tournaments in recent history. In addition, ITV4 will also play out the five games that featured the England football team in some of their most memorable head to heads, as well as the final between Germany and the Czech Republic. Football fans will be able to relive the drama from the epic Summer of ’96, during which host nation England fought to bring the trophy back home, with a squad made up of sporting legends Alan Shearer, David Seaman, Paul Gascoigne, Sol Campbell and Teddy Sheringham. 1996 was the last time England reached the semifinals of the European Championships and remains fondly remembered thanks to Baddiel and Skinner and The Lightning Seeds’ chart-topping anthem Three Lions (Football’s Coming Home). Paul Mortimer, Head of Digital Channels & Acquisitions, ITV said: “Nothing brings the country together like Euro fever, and with this year’s tournament postponed to 2021, we’re giving our audience a chance to relive one of the all-time great sporting events, Euro ’96. Thanks to the ITV Hub and ITV4, there’ll be no shortage of vintage football classics for fans to indulge in over the next few months.”
  5. Cracking article but it still extremely hurts :'( :'(
  6. Paully

    St James' Park

    https://theathletic.co.uk/1680760/2020/03/26/unwritten-newcastle-planned-own-san-siro/ Unwritten: How Newcastle United tried and failed to build their own San Siro By Chris Waugh Mar 25, 2020 37 Between 1992 and 1997, Newcastle United found themselves sliding towards the third tier, then were galvanised by Kevin Keegan, promoted to the Premier League, played a swashbuckling brand of football but agonisingly missed out on the title, brought Alan Shearer home to Tyneside for a world-record £15 million and played in the Champions League. But, that elusive major trophy aside, there was still one crucial aspect missing from their exponential upsurge come the 1996-97 season, according to the man whose millions made it all possible. “We needed a world-class stadium to offer us the best chance of sustained success,” former owner Sir John Hall tells The Athletic. The capacity of St James’ Park at the time was only 36,610. With almost 20,000 names on the season-ticket waiting list, demand massively outstripped supply. “St James’ Park simply wasn’t big enough to cope with demand and the site itself had severe limitations,” Sir John says. “We had to consider relocating. By the winter of 1996, we thought we had found the ideal solution.” In February 1997, a planning application for a £90 million, 55,000-seater stadium – which boasted a retractable roof and could later be expanded to 70,000 – on Castle Leazes, half a mile from St James’ Park, was submitted to Newcastle City Council. What’s more, the historic stadium would not have been demolished entirely; rather, it would have been converted into a 12,500-seater indoor arena as part of Sir John’s vision for a “Newcastle Sporting Club”. Describing it as a sporting complex “fit for the 21st Century”, Sir John proclaimed in December 1996 that the development would make Newcastle United the “envy of Europe”. Yet, within nine months, the application to build Britain’s biggest new stadium since the original Wembley had been withdrawn and the ambitious plan scrapped. This is the inside story of Newcastle’s vision for a “San Siro of the North” and why it never became a reality… By the mid-1990s, it was obvious that Newcastle simply had to upscale. But the issue was: How? The need for Newcastle to consider relocation can, according to former Newcastle city architect Trevor Skempton, be traced back to their promotion into the Premiership in 1993. “Newcastle carried out several parallel explorations for expansion at the time, including relocation,” Skempton says. “But all my focus was on demonstrating the viability of expanding St James’ Park. As difficult as it would have been, I outlined how a phased rebuild could eventually lead to an 80,000 capacity.” Sir John Hall instead opted for a £25 million reconstruction of St James’ Park into a 36,610-seater stadium. But, as Newcastle’s second-tier success swiftly translated into the top flight, it became evident the decision to limit capacity had been a mistake. “If we had extended St James’ Park by more sooner, then subsequent expansion may have been easier,” Sir John admits now. “But time was critical and it would have been difficult and expensive.” John Waugh, a member of The Magpie Group who helped Sir John acquire the club, is adamant greater expansion should have come sooner. “Sir John bitterly regretted not being bolder,” Waugh tells The Athletic. “I remember during the 1996-97 season, as plans for the new stadium were being drawn up, he would come to me regularly and say, ‘We should have done Skempton’s scheme.’ But it was too late.” By 1996, Russell Jones, a property developer who was on Newcastle’s board, got tasked with finding a way to increase capacity. “At the time I didn’t think we could do anything with St James’,” he recalls. “What we really wanted was a retractable roof because the weather did affect matches up here back then. That was impossible at St James’, so we had to look elsewhere.” The decision was taken to build a new stadium from scratch. “One way to accommodate more people, particularly kids who’ll be the next generation of fans, is to build a new stadium,” Sir John says. “So that’s what we tried to do.” Over six months, a task group comprising Jones, Sir John and directors Freddy Shepherd and Douglas Hall considered 14 different sites. According to club historian Paul Joannou in his book “Fortress St James'”, those included plots at Little Benton (which now houses the club’s academy), Byker (the historic birthplace of the club), Gosforth Park, Newburn Haugh, Woolsington Park and Gateshead Quays. But only two serious contenders emerged: Castle Leazes, and a proposed 75,000-seater ground near the Gateshead International Stadium used for athletics. “We did look at other sites, including holding advanced discussions with Gateshead Council,” Jones admits. “But we wanted to stick to the city centre if we could. We call St James’ ‘The Cathedral on the Hill’ and we wanted to stay as close as possible.” As much as Sir John values progress, he also recognises the importance of identity, and negotiations with Gateshead Council were primarily used as leverage for talks with Newcastle Council. “The position of Newcastle’s stadium is unique in football,” Sir John says. “Ideally we wanted to keep the club at the heart of the city.” With Gateshead ruled out, it became “a straight choice between expanding St James’ and moving to Castle Leazes”, according to Waugh. “Castle Leazes seemed like the perfect solution,” Sir John says. “The plans were quite spectacular.” In December 1996, Sir John held a press conference at St James’ Park, outlining the club’s plans to relocate a 10-minute walk away to Castle Leazes. NUFCThreatLevel @NUFCThreatLevel COMPETING: Designs for a new stadium on Leazes Park, 1997. #NUFC Embedded video 336 12:40 PM - Mar 6, 2020 Twitter Ads info and privacy 85 people are talking about this Despite part of the plot being on the historic Town Moor — common land dating back to the 12th century used for cattle grazing and allotments — the Freemen of Newcastle, who had those grazing rights, welcomed the proposals. Their chairman Len Fenwick described Castle Leazes as an “ideal site” – partly because, in exchange, they would assume control of the council-owned Exhibition Park. “The location was perfect because we could have built a uniform stadium from scratch,” Jones says. “But the development was about so much more than a new football ground.” Interestingly, Sir John had already seen plans for an £8.8 million ice-hockey arena rejected in 1995 following objections from conservationists. But the council welcomed the club’s state-of-the-art proposals, primarily because they included extensive regeneration of Leazes Park, as well as the redevelopment of St James’ Park into a multi-sports venue. “Building new, rather than redeveloping, is always better,” Sir John says. “If you can build new then you can put fresh ideas into it without restrictions. That’s why we came up with as detailed and ambitious a plan as possible. We wanted to set standards off the pitch as well as on it. We had a fantastic football team, now we needed fantastic facilities to match.” An initial £65 million would be spent building a two-tiered, 55,000-seater bowl stadium with a retractable roof which reached international standards required to stage FIFA and UEFA events. The ground was designed so a third tier could be added further down the line, elevating the roof – which featured two metal arches, intended to echo the iconic Tyne Bridge – and increasing capacity to 70,000. A retractable pitch, allowing for concerts, was also proposed. “We came up with a design which sunk the stadium five metres into the ground so that it wasn’t obtrusive for the area,” Jones says. “We’d travelled around Europe and the USA, taking inspiration from lots of stadiums. We wanted it to be ultra-modern, with a retractable roof and pitch, like many in the US. “It’s partly reminiscent of the San Siro but really we took inspiration from lots of grounds. We wanted a complete end-to-end oval where there’d be no restricted views and a real amphitheatre atmosphere.” Rather than raze St James’ Park, it would be repurposed into a 12,500-seater indoor arena. While the East and Milburn Stands would be demolished, the Sir John Hall Stand would be dismantled, re-erected and attached to the Gallowgate. The £25 million St James’ Centre, as it was to be called, was part of Sir John’s vision to create a “Newcastle Sporting Club”, inspired by Barcelona’s multi-sport teams. It would also house Newcastle’s “School of Excellence” and double as a first-team training venue. There were even proposals to build another full-size pitch on Strawberry Place for the reserves, although those never became concrete plans. “It was the St James’ Centre which excited me,” Waugh admits. “I preferred Skempton’s initial vision for St James’ Park over a new stadium but the scale of the proposals were impressive.” Featuring a running track, ice-hockey facilities, gyms and courts for basketball, tennis and other sports, the arena would also host concerts and exhibitions. The club’s offices would still be based at St James’, as would the shop, museum and box office. “It was all part of the Newcastle Sporting Club,” Sir John, who also owned the city’s rugby union, basketball and ice-hockey teams, explains. “I’ve always believed that a successful sports club can have a positive effect on a region. It would give the North East much-needed positive publicity across a range of sports and then attract business investment. That’s always been my philosophy and we tried to realise it.” As well as create two world-class sporting venues, the scheme would also lead to an extensive upgrade of Leazes Park. Opened in 1873, the park had become rundown and significant renovations were proposed ,while a new boulevard connecting Castle Leazes with the St James’ Centre would also be built. In total, the 55-acre, two-year development was estimated to cost upwards of £115 million, the largest single investment in the region since Sir John built the MetroCentre shopping mall in Gateshead a decade previously. Finance was to be raised by a flotation of Newcastle’s share capital on the Stock Exchange. When plans were submitted in February 1997, Sir John said: “We believe in this plan and we believe in the centre. If we get planning permission, this stadium will be one of the best in Europe.” “And it would have been,” Sir John says now, reflecting on those words. “We wanted to put Newcastle on the map permanently. But huge developments are never straightforward.” Having fought against the 1993 redevelopment of St James’ Park and lost, pressure groups were determined not to see such a significant scheme pass four years later. Even though the council, the Freemen and 69 per cent of supporters in poll by local paper the Evening Chronicle favoured the scheme, a small but influential “No Business on the Moor” campaign formed, achieving 36,000 petition signatures. Dolly Potter, of the Friends of Leazes Park, led the objections but green protesters from a wide variety of groups joined in, while the council’s own Conservation Advisory Subcommittee did not support the plans. “The opposition was fierce from a few small but well-connected groups,” Sir John recalls. “We spent hundreds of thousands on the proposals but faced delay after delay.” Once English Heritage was alerted to the situation it became evident that, if Newcastle wanted to build their new stadium, they would have to navigate a public enquiry because of the pressure applied to environment secretary John Prescott. The council could not grant planning permission before such an enquiry, a process that would take years and could end up costing millions. “We didn’t have the time to spare nor did we want to waste money fighting a battle we may end up losing,” Sir John says. “We came to the conclusion we had to think again about St James’ Park itself.” But, upon reflection, Waugh believes there was a secondary factor in the withdrawal of the proposals. “I would say at one stage the development actually got 75 per cent of the way there,” Waugh explains. “But on-field form affected the plans. At the end of 1996 we still had Keegan and we were all swept along on that wave. But, by November 1997, Kenny Dalglish had become manager and the enthusiasm waned. That seemed to suck the momentum out of the project.” Sir John himself, meanwhile, also decided to step back from running of the club. He resigned as chairman in December 1997, a month after Newcastle withdrew their plans and issued this statement: “The company has listened very carefully to the issues raised locally. In light of these issues, the company has redoubled its efforts to find an alternative stadium plan.” Shepherd and Douglas Hall, Sir John’s son, opted to revisit the potential redevelopment of St James’ Park. Radical and costly proposals to extend the stadium to its current capacity of 52,405 were drawn up by Jones, adding another tier to both the Sir John Hall and Milburn Stands. Planning permission was obtained in July 1998 and work completed two years later at a cost of £42 million – an extremely expensive way to add 16,000 seats when compared to what it would have taken to build a new higher-capacity stadium. The lease on the land at Strawberry Place was also acquired by the club in 1998 and earmarked for future development, including the potential expansion of the Gallowgate. “We couldn’t afford to lose any capacity so the stadium had to remain fully operational as we rebuilt, which made it more expensive,” Jones says. “We pushed St James’ to its limits expansion-wise and the stadium is now as big as it can be on that site, realistically.” In theory, St James’ Park could still be expanded to up to 80,000. While it is technically still possible to extend the East Stand, the Grade I-listed buildings on Leazes Terrace directly behind it make that highly unlikely. As for expanding the Gallowgate, Mike Ashley’s decision to sell the Strawberry Place lease last year has made that increasingly difficult. St James’ remains one of the most iconic venues in English football but, although it is the seventh-largest in the Premier League, other clubs are looking to move into higher-capacity stadia and Newcastle’s ground cannot be easily expanded further. The ambition of a super stadium on Tyneside to match Europe’s best now appears a distant fantasy. “We have a good stadium but not quite what it could have been had we seized the moment,” Sir John concludes. “Castle Leazes was a dream of its time that sadly never came off.” (Photo: Tim McGuinness/Mirrorpix/Getty Images) Boom! Glad you really enjoyed it.
  7. https://theathletic.co.uk/1700025/2020/03/27/mike-ashley-sports-direct-newcastle-united/ Newcastle don’t deserve to have their reputation tarnished by Ashley’s antics By Chris Waugh 3h ago 5 Mike Ashley claims he hates being portrayed as the “pantomime villain”. At best, he seems incapable of casting off this image. At worst, he seems unwilling to do so. Anger towards Ashley’s actions is an emotion to which a significant portion of Newcastle United fans have become accustomed. Now a significant portion of the UK population share Tyneside’s ire. What is most frustrating is that his negative image remains inextricably linked with the football club he owns. Newcastle United and, most particularly, Newcastle United fans, deserve so much more. At a time of national (and international) crisis, when the government has ordered a borderline lockdown of the country and told all non-essential businesses to close, Sports Direct — of which Ashley is the majority shareholder — initially stated it would remain open, claiming it is “uniquely well-placed to help keep the UK as fit and healthy as possible”. Cabinet minister Michael Gove responded by saying he did not see “any justification” for Sports Direct to continue trading and so the company was forced to perform a u-turn and shut its outlets. At PMQs, meanwhile, prime minister Boris Johnson responded to a question on the matter from Newcastle Central MP Chi Onwurah by stressing Sports Direct must “obey rules or expect the consequences”. But it did not end there. The Press Association claimed the firm has raised prices of certain items — including skipping ropes, weights and resistance belts, ideal for training at home — by as much as 50 per cent in recent days. Ashley’s company insisted “this is not the complete or accurate picture…and there continues to be a 20 per cent discount on all online sales until mid-April”. Yet, with the majority of the population now consigned to their homes, there has been an increased demand for equipment to allow them to exercise in their houses. Chris Wootton, the group’s chief financial officer, defended the price rises. “There is a supply and demand to this,” he said. “We are not operating at full staffing in the warehouse and this was a way of relieving the pressure.” Ashley has also subsequently apologised for what he describes as “the misunderstandings of the last few days”. In an open letter released on Friday morning, Ashley insisted he was “deeply apologetic” and expressed regret about his company’s handling of the situation, stressing that “our intentions were only to seek clarity from the Government as to whether we should keep some of our stores open; we would never have acted against their advice.” He accepted that the emails to government were “ill-judged and poorly timed” and, as well as declaring his “immense pride” in how key workers have handled the situation so far, has now pledged his firm’s “entire fleet of lorries” for use by the NHS and other “key workforces”. But widespread criticism of Sports Direct, including from Ms Onwurah and fellow Labour MP Ian Lavery, has followed. I share the indignation. Without inadvertently equating football and wider public-health concerns, my vexation levels have kept rising. In recent weeks we have witnessed acts of charity, selflessness and empathy. Hotels have offered up rooms for NHS staff, businesses have joined in the national effort to produce ventilators and sanitiser, while communities have ensured those most in need are being cared for. This is society at its very heartwarming best. Depressingly, we have also seen examples of society at its disappointing worst. That has come in the form of stockpiling, (in some cases) rash redundancies or wage cuts and rank opportunism. As ever with Ashley, if a chance arises for him to enhance his own reputation, he inevitably makes the wrong choice and damages it further. Last year, in an interview with the Daily Mail, Ashley even admitted that, as far as his PR goes when it comes to running a football club, he is “very bad”. That is a gross understatement. Some who have dealt with Ashley insist he courts publicity, positive or negative, because it provides airtime for his businesses. But there is a point where the balance tips to the extent that such exposure is disadvantageous, perhaps irreparably so. His harmful reputational decisions are too plentiful to list in full but, as far as Newcastle are concerned, they include (but are not limited to): renaming St James’ Park the Sports Direct Arena, alienating record goalscorer Alan Shearer, overseeing hapless reigns which led to two relegations and responding to Jonas Gutierrez’s cancer diagnosis in such a way that the midfielder won a disability discrimination claim. There was, of course, also losing an employment tribunal against club legend Kevin Keegan, who alleged unfair dismissal, during which it was found the club “repeatedly and intentionally misled the press, public and the fans”. Another arrived this week, too, as fans pleaded with the club to freeze or defer season-ticket payments, both for those supporters who pay by monthly direct debit and those who were scheduled to buy their 2020-21 package with a lump sum. One fan, Chris Crossey, even claimed £624 came out of his account on Wednesday morning for his 2020-21 season ticket. The coronavirus pandemic has left many facing uncertainty and economic hardship. Some supporters have lost their jobs while others have seen their income cut or face potential redundancy. And there is no immediate prospect of their product being delivered, either, with the Premier League season suspended until the end of April at the earliest. Yet, according to a statement released by the Newcastle United Supporters Trust (NUST), “the club stated it has no intention of freezing or delaying payments, both for those that pay annually and monthly.” Even though they are a Premier League club whose turnover for the most recent financial year was £178.5 million, Newcastle’s finances will be significantly affected by the current crisis. But so too will those of Brighton & Hove Albion, who have announced their fans will receive a three-month delay to season-ticket payments due to the COVID-19 situation. Newcastle may argue that their season-ticket prices have remained competitive for years, that many fans are on 10-year price-freeze deals and that 10,000 half-season tickets were given out in December. But, as positive as those measures are, this is the moment benevolence is required. Everyone is being affected by the situation and small acts such as deferring payments can go a long way when supporters are worrying about their health, finances and livelihoods. In my view, Newcastle United is not only a football club but a key social institution. It should be at the very heart of the community as a symbol of hope, generosity and unity during these worrying times. And, in many ways, it is. There are so many good people at the club doing brilliant and life-affirming things every day. The NUFC Fans Foodbank, which has raised £300,000 worth of monetary and perishable donations in three years, has been championed by the club, who nobly delivered the food ordered in for the Sheffield United game that was postponed. The club’s Foundation is delivering thousands of food parcels and educational resources to children in the city affected by school closures. Initiatives such as United As One, Be A Game Changer and NE1 Works have tackled issues ranging from diversity, racism, inclusion, mental health, education and employment opportunities. These examples of altruism — which are far from exhaustive, there are many more that could be cited — prove Newcastle United can be, and is in many ways, a force for good. But its reputation continues to be unhelpfully tarnished by its relationship with Mike Ashley. There are more than 130 Sports Direct billboards at St James’ Park and so every time Ashley’s company makes a detrimental decision, it negatively impacts the club. In fact, it is an embarrassment to Newcastle United’s world-renowned name. If some of those good people at the club were able to do things differently and run Newcastle as a community hub first and foremost, rather than as an organ of Ashley’s stack-them-high, sell-them-cheap empire, then the pride so many fans have lost in Newcastle United may be restored. Newcastle United and Newcastle United fans deserve a better owner and they most certainly deserve better than to have their own reputation tarnished by an unwanted and unwelcome association with a self-professed pantomime villain. Perhaps now those beyond Tyneside will finally understand why Newcastle supporters are so desperate for new ownership, new direction and a new era.
  8. South Shields must be raging - 12 points clear!
  9. FA competitions With the 2019-20 Emirates FA Cup, Women’s FA Cup, Buildbase FA Trophy and Buildbase FA Vase all at advanced stages, we are reviewing all options as we seek to complete these competitions whenever it is safe and appropriate to do so. Clubs involved are close to reaching a major final and for those clubs and supporters we will do all we can to keep the Wembley dream alive.
  10. Eventually, the Ronnie have gone in! https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/mike-ashley-done-wrong-thing-17983112.amp?__twitter_impression=true
  11. Huge match - we owe this lot for last season and the Charity Shield!
  12. My dad was gutted when he read an article recently saying that we were close to signing Gheorge Hagi, not sure he's going to survive me telling him we could have got Cruyff KK said during the WC USA 94 he’d love to sign Hagi and Stoichkov, two of my all-time absolute faves man. Those were amazing times to be a NUFC fan and there wasn’t a top player on earth we couldn’t afford or wouldn’t have been interested in. The Baggio shirt in the car incident Great days - a travesty we never won anything!
  13. Paully

    Sunderland

    this is spectacular. April 1 self isolation activity sorted. I've avoided all links as I want no spoilers
  14. The bookies are going to lose an absolute fortune during this
  15. No mater what you think, fans shouldn't be having a go at others fans for going to matches now - the screw needs well and truly turned on this fat twat after his actions this week A new statement read: "Last week NUST contacted Newcastle United to express significant concerns regarding season ticket payments. "We did not receive a response. "Yesterday we went public with our request for the suspension of all future Season Ticket payments during this incredibly difficult time. "There is no prospect of professional football recommencing any time soon given the current global health crisis, let alone the prospect of understanding the implications on timing on fixtures for next season. "We find it incredibly disturbing that the club continues to take payments from supporters during these extremely difficult times, in what is a health and economic crisis. "Following our call for the suspension and delay of all future Season Ticket payments Newcastle United contacted us earlier today. "The club stated it has no intention of freezing or delaying payments, both for those that pay annually and monthly. "Today, Tuesday 25 March 2020, Newcastle United took payments for the 2020/21 season from those supporters who opt to pay for their season ticket annually. Monthly payments will also continue as normal. We are disappointed that Newcastle United is unwilling to offer a meaningful support system to fans through this difficult time. Many supporters can afford to continue to pay, but we still feel more MUST be done for supporters who will suffer most due to the knock on effects of coronavirus global pandemic. "We are also deeply concerned to learn that some supporters who normally pay monthly have seen the full payment taken today. Any fans in that situation should contact the club immediately. "Newcastle United have called for our support numerous times throughout the last decade and Newcastle fans have responded every time. At a time when fans now need reassurances and support, we are deeply disappointed the club will not reciprocate that support in these unique and challenging times."
  16. God knows pal. It'll be a pisser for Hebburn because I think it'll mean no promotion and no possible (probable with the draw) Vase Final at Wemberlee
  17. I love reading HTT's posts Aaron Hughes gets my vote - one who hasn't been mentioned who I liked was Alain Goma!
×
×
  • Create New...