Ronaldo

Course there has, he isn't even a RW.

Worth it to see Bobby dancing to this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qbusT8ccig

Realistic.

Yeah, that'll happen.

FB.

Yes.

Plenty of Championship teams will want both, especially Shola.

Ranger is brilliant IMO. Ranger might not have scored many but he can actually contribute to team build up play. Yes, because he passed it 4 yards to Guthrie against Leicester.

How many times have you actually seen him play? im from Glasgow and even the Rangers fans think he is a lazy b******. Cant score against decent teams, his record against Celtic and in Europe is s**** if its someone better than those 3 players we want fine but he aint that much better He's better than those 3 = Improvement. Who cares if he isn't great, we can't afford or attract great players and won't until will starting building from the bottom and a earning a touch of credibility. IIRC you were delighted we signed best coz we needed a striker. Look how that turned out lol You remember wrong, i wasn't delighted, just willing to give him a chance. It turned out that Lovenkrands and Carroll started scoring lots of goals. And we no longer had to play that waste of space gangsta wannabe.

By Premier League standards aye, which is my main worry, however, he can find a position to score. Just has to be seen if he can do it in a league better than League 1/Championship quality. Having no pace makes us very easy to defend against, teams can push up and squeeze us in the middle of the park where we have poor quality ball players and thus we lose the ball easily. Happened a lot in the season we went down. Only really Routledge and at a push Jonas with any pace in what i'd imagine our starting XI to be next season. Are people's opinions that Lovenkrands is too much of a gamble up front in the Premiership? I would rather he played than we signed Boyd tbh. Would rather have Lovenkrands playing instead of Boyd as well. At least Lovenkrands has some pace to burn. Hoe many times have you seen Boyd play? He's twice the player that Lovenkrands is. Gers fans would laugh at your post. Read one post above yours. In other words, you've never seen him play.

How many times have you actually seen him play? im from Glasgow and even the Rangers fans think he is a lazy b******. Cant score against decent teams, his record against Celtic and in Europe is s**** if its someone better than those 3 players we want fine but he aint that much better He's better than those 3 = Improvement. Who cares if he isn't great, we can't afford or attract great players and won't until we starting building from the bottom and earning a touch of credibility.

By Premier League standards aye, which is my main worry, however, he can find a position to score. Just has to be seen if he can do it in a league better than League 1/Championship quality. Having no pace makes us very easy to defend against, teams can push up and squeeze us in the middle of the park where we have poor quality ball players and thus we lose the ball easily. Happened a lot in the season we went down. Only really Routledge and at a push Jonas with any pace in what i'd imagine our starting XI to be next season. Are people's opinions that Lovenkrands is too much of a gamble up front in the Premiership? I would rather he played than we signed Boyd tbh. Would rather have Lovenkrands playing instead of Boyd as well. At least Lovenkrands has some pace to burn. Hoe many times have you seen Boyd play? He's twice the player that Lovenkrands is. Gers fans would laugh at your post.

Good news if true, he's better than Lovenkrands, Shola and Best.

Surely you mean July?

Cannavaro is finished, and never thought he'd do well in the PL.

Exactly my sentiments.

Plymouth, and yes, it's very funny.

Eat North Korean? Neither do I.

Portugal are going to get anihilated by the Cote d'ivoire, can't wait.

No he can't.. I'm sure you once said the same about Solano.

Did I once suggest we should buy him? No, I merely said he could probably play RB. His wages mean it wouldn't make sense for us to offer him a contract.

And? He could still do it.

One's a more obvious prick than the other.

Well the whole place went berserk when Harry Redknapp was linked to the job? Was he deemed not good enough? Look how that's turnt out. I think it had more to do with the fact that Harry Redknapp is a total f***ing bell-end of epic proportions. And Mourinho isn't? He's a born cheat.