Ronaldo

You do know we're talking about Bassong here?

Overpaid waste of space, get fucking rid

he's a risky man to appoint given his previous history, his fault or not

It never ends

He plays in the Russian second division and he's class?

Jenas to Villa? surely not

so why haven't they? if there is a player available, who has the potential to be better than adebayor,why haven't they taken a gamble on him? because he's s***. At newcastle he's played under Roeder, Allardyce, Keegan, Hughton, Kinnear and Shearer which one of them could of and had long enough to correct the faults in his game? Apparently none of them gave him one on one coaching ffs

hahahahahahaahahahahahahaha You are right very very right cannot argue at all.... Oba would put Adebayor to shame under the right management like s****. why hasn't ferguson, wenger, mourinho etc ever taken a gamble on him then if he can be better than adebayor? delusional man. adebayor is one of the best strikers in the world,martins will never,ever be as good as adebayor . Adebayorhouse is not one of the best strikers in the world man. Martins' major fault is his brain, a good manager would surely sort that out

You expect 20+ from Martins in that team?

not really. his overall play has to be considered, especially as he's not a natural goalscorer. what he lacks in goalscoring ability he should make up for in team-play, playing ability and work-rate. none of the last three are existent. You said 34 goals was s****. Then I asked how many he'd have to score for you to consider him good and you said '40+' make your mind up they could be 6 penalties.it was a pretty s**** question in all honesty. i would accept the useless fuckwit if he did have those three assets i mentioned in my previous quote. well than I ask you again, how many goals per season would he have to score to justify his selection?

not really. his overall play has to be considered, especially as he's not a natural goalscorer. what he lacks in goalscoring ability he should make up for in team-play, playing ability and work-rate. none of the last three are existent. You said 34 goals was shite. Then I asked how many he'd have to score for you to consider him good and you said '40+' make your mind up

What are we asking from Martins? That he score 1 in 2? Something that without penalites not even Shearer got anywhere near 6 goals the difference between shite and good apparently. I'm not saying 34 goals is owt to be proud of like

says it all

So you reckon Alex Ferguson and Brian Clough would have turned a blind eye to a player calling them a prick and s**** manager do you? to be fair, we have no evidence of that whatsoever

and how many would he have to score before you'd call him a good striker?

it's actually 34 goals. Better than 1 in 3 which isn't quite a shit return imo

your views on Xisco, Martins and basically everything are beyond ridiculous. You beg for the response you've recieved

I watched us get beat by both Arsenal and Hull at the start of the season in Nevada Smiths, not much of an atmosphere

I'm glad Spurs are no longer being linked with Van Nistelrooj. Would sicken me to see a player of that class and calibre join those cunts

The whole Shearer - Barton argument is a sympton of the 'what type of manager will Shearer be' debate, with most thinking he'll more closely resemble Sounes than Robson. Honestly, I really do worry if Shearer views Greame Souness as any sort of person to look up to in a management context

Saying something controversial requires a small amount of intelligence, otherwise it's just fishing and piss-taking.

He's a pretty poor defender and an absolutely woeful natural footballer, get rid

Liverpool spending £20m on a RB? I'd love to know how much of their budget that is considering their need for other players, ie a kingpin CB and an adequate striker to partner Torres

Wshmag making friends again

What is the answer to 99 out of 100 questions? Money