mrmojorisin75

it's utter nonsense man

"technically"...can you quote me the rule tron?

is this real life? haidara has looked great in the last two games since they took obertan away from him I thought he was all over the place today and he was very sloppy in possession. He's young and has potential, but he's not ready. We need an established left-back, someone solid and dependable. i think we watched 2 different players, he was excellent today Whenever he got forward he either over hit a cross out of play, hit a pass too hard or dilly dallied and got robbed. He put in one or two good tackles and blocks, but several times he was ball watching and gave up too much space and time to his man. I just don't see much in either aspect of his game, attacking or defensively. fair enough, i disagree

get fucked man, seriously he's not moving when it happens, this is madness, i'm out, everyone has lost their fucking minds...watch cazorla...he's laughing about it because he's knows it was fucking stupid

just watched it again on YT, his momentum was literally between steps after a jump, there is no way on earth he could hurt the player with what he did and cazorlas reaction said it all, he know it was utter balls

went looking for some pictures of the sending off and this is what i was met with as a result: "Aleksandar Mitrovic sent off for Newcastle against Arsenal – is he the Premier League's most rash player?" Yep let's blame the lad

is this real life? haidara has looked great in the last two games since they took obertan away from him Was just thinking this, was impressed with him today he looks quality to me was it giroud he muscled off the ball near end? ronaldo approves

is this real life? haidara has looked great in the last two games since they took obertan away from him I thought he was all over the place today and he was very sloppy in possession. He's young and has potential, but he's not ready. We need an established left-back, someone solid and dependable. i think we watched 2 different players, he was excellent today

liked the bit second half when he did their left back on his left foot and cut back just like benny used to do

Go and watch Rugby, ffs. missed the "decent game" bit there aw man Haha...you can argue all the like about it man. Fact is, the rules are the rules and Mitrovic did something that IS a red card. No denying. Whether it was harsh/clumsy or not is irrelevant really. You'd be hard pushed to find many neutral fans watching that who disagreed with much that the red did, barring a few harsh yellows after the red card. well our manager has just gone on telly and said the same as everyone else, if the laws were that clear would he have done so? it was clumsy, there was no intent whatsoever, it was a bullshit sending off man EDIT: oh yeah and if you think the ref had a decent game there you're utterly, utterly deluded like Mate of course the manager is defending Mitrovic, rightly so, it's his player and it wasn't malicious, but at the same time, it was dangerous. I'd be fucking livid if McClaren didn't defend his players in public. dangerous bollocks man, planet soft cunt Yeah, welcome to 2015 so do you think it was actually dangerous or are you quoting some stupid fucking rule? because "studs up" and "raking studs" are technically both dangerous in certain circumstances but mitrovic did neither and the player was in no danger whatsoever this is surely the crux of the matter? second yellow? aye alright, straight red? get fucked I think I've said how I saw it plenty of times now, his studs ended up in someone's shins, and that's usually interpreted as dangerous play by the refs these days intentional or not. He might have got away with it if he hadn't been involved in reckless challenges before today. Rules have changed and are generally applied a lot more harshly these days and that's the same for everyone. don't have replays but i'd argue this isn't correct from the clips i watched I thin you'll find that there'll be photos which prove it is before too long. well i'd be amazed if they exist because i sat and watched mitro's foot land half on top of the other lads foot and half up his shin, as soon as he "hit" he pulled away and the arsenal pricked rolled around like he'd been murdered

is this real life? haidara has looked great in the last two games since they took obertan away from him

quote the rule pls EDIT:

Go and watch Rugby, ffs. missed the "decent game" bit there aw man Haha...you can argue all the like about it man. Fact is, the rules are the rules and Mitrovic did something that IS a red card. No denying. Whether it was harsh/clumsy or not is irrelevant really. You'd be hard pushed to find many neutral fans watching that who disagreed with much that the red did, barring a few harsh yellows after the red card. well our manager has just gone on telly and said the same as everyone else, if the laws were that clear would he have done so? it was clumsy, there was no intent whatsoever, it was a bullshit sending off man EDIT: oh yeah and if you think the ref had a decent game there you're utterly, utterly deluded like Mate of course the manager is defending Mitrovic, rightly so, it's his player and it wasn't malicious, but at the same time, it was dangerous. I'd be fucking livid if McClaren didn't defend his players in public. dangerous bollocks man, planet soft cunt Yeah, welcome to 2015 so do you think it was actually dangerous or are you quoting some stupid fucking rule? because "studs up" and "raking studs" are technically both dangerous in certain circumstances but mitrovic did neither and the player was in no danger whatsoever this is surely the crux of the matter? second yellow? aye alright, straight red? get fucked I think I've said how I saw it plenty of times now, his studs ended up in someone's shins, and that's usually interpreted as dangerous play by the refs these days intentional or not. He might have got away with it if he hadn't been involved in reckless challenges before today. Rules have changed and are generally applied a lot more harshly these days and that's the same for everyone. don't have replays but i'd argue this isn't correct from the clips i watched

tried his best like, not easy, probably should have been sent off at one point mind like the rest of our team

He got a result against Chelsea in every season he was here man. only once at SB though aye? or did he nick a draw as well once? In his first half season he nicked a draw there. anyway it was more a point that he's got a knack of meeting teams at the right time when he needs it, chelsea are wretched today

Go and watch Rugby, ffs. missed the "decent game" bit there aw man Haha...you can argue all the like about it man. Fact is, the rules are the rules and Mitrovic did something that IS a red card. No denying. Whether it was harsh/clumsy or not is irrelevant really. You'd be hard pushed to find many neutral fans watching that who disagreed with much that the red did, barring a few harsh yellows after the red card. well our manager has just gone on telly and said the same as everyone else, if the laws were that clear would he have done so? it was clumsy, there was no intent whatsoever, it was a bullshit sending off man EDIT: oh yeah and if you think the ref had a decent game there you're utterly, utterly deluded like Mate of course the manager is defending Mitrovic, rightly so, it's his player and it wasn't malicious, but at the same time, it was dangerous. I'd be fucking livid if McClaren didn't defend his players in public. dangerous bollocks man, planet soft cunt Yeah, welcome to 2015 so do you think it was actually dangerous or are you quoting some stupid fucking rule? because "studs up" and "raking studs" are technically both dangerous in certain circumstances but mitrovic did neither and the player was in no danger whatsoever this is surely the crux of the matter? second yellow? aye alright, straight red? get fucked

He got a result against Chelsea in every season he was here man. only once at SB though aye? or did he nick a draw as well once?

Go and watch Rugby, ffs. missed the "decent game" bit there aw man Haha...you can argue all the like about it man. Fact is, the rules are the rules and Mitrovic did something that IS a red card. No denying. Whether it was harsh/clumsy or not is irrelevant really. You'd be hard pushed to find many neutral fans watching that who disagreed with much that the red did, barring a few harsh yellows after the red card. A few harsh yellows and failure to give the same treatment for the same challenge by arsenal add up to an abysmal performance to me. Ask the same neutral fans when they're being hamstrung by a shit one-sided harsh performance if they think the ref has had a great performance and see if they're in agreement. fuck this shit man, so many fans pardewed into taking whatever we get and lapping it up with a biscuit

Go and watch Rugby, ffs. missed the "decent game" bit there aw man Haha...you can argue all the like about it man. Fact is, the rules are the rules and Mitrovic did something that IS a red card. No denying. Whether it was harsh/clumsy or not is irrelevant really. You'd be hard pushed to find many neutral fans watching that who disagreed with much that the red did, barring a few harsh yellows after the red card. well our manager has just gone on telly and said the same as everyone else, if the laws were that clear would he have done so? it was clumsy, there was no intent whatsoever, it was a bullshit sending off man EDIT: oh yeah and if you think the ref had a decent game there you're utterly, utterly deluded like Mate of course the manager is defending Mitrovic, rightly so, it's his player and it wasn't malicious, but at the same time, it was dangerous. I'd be fucking livid if McClaren didn't defend his players in public. dangerous bollocks man, planet soft cunt

Eh? Of course we're behind him, but we need him to be on the pitch and not sat watching in the stands to get behind him. We could always try appealing against the red, but do you honestly think it's going to get overturned? It being overturned is more of an issue of how corrupt and unaccountable referees are these days. You could argue it was harsh and you would have a point, you could argue it was dangerous and you would still have a point. It's not clear cut unfortunately, and his being involved in a few of similar challenges has gone against him. Tackling with your studs up is always going to be dicey, he's going to have to cut that out. tell me how it was dangerous please...he was essentially standing and had no momentum whatsoever, he tried to nick the ball but his natural motion took him down onto the lads leg when the ball went studs up and all that shit was meant for something very different, no way the lad could get hurt from that challenge, none Well maybe I am just imagining the rules have changed a bit since the days of Vinnie Jones, and these days if you miss the ball and rake someone's shins with your studs it's a good chance it might be a red. he didn't "rake his legs", he stood where he landed after trying to get the ball and then took his foot away thinking nothing of it

fucking pardew man, worst i've seen chelsea in years

Go and watch Rugby, ffs. missed the "decent game" bit there aw man Haha...you can argue all the like about it man. Fact is, the rules are the rules and Mitrovic did something that IS a red card. No denying. Whether it was harsh/clumsy or not is irrelevant really. You'd be hard pushed to find many neutral fans watching that who disagreed with much that the red did, barring a few harsh yellows after the red card. well our manager has just gone on telly and said the same as everyone else, if the laws were that clear would he have done so? it was clumsy, there was no intent whatsoever, it was a bullshit sending off man EDIT: oh yeah and if you think the ref had a decent game there you're utterly, utterly deluded like

Eh? Of course we're behind him, but we need him to be on the pitch and not sat watching in the stands to get behind him. We could always try appealing against the red, but do you honestly think it's going to get overturned? It being overturned is more of an issue of how corrupt and unaccountable referees are these days. You could argue it was harsh and you would have a point, you could argue it was dangerous and you would still have a point. It's not clear cut unfortunately, and his being involved in a few of similar challenges has gone against him. Tackling with your studs up is always going to be dicey, he's going to have to cut that out. tell me how it was dangerous please...he was essentially standing and had no momentum whatsoever, he tried to nick the ball but his natural motion took him down onto the lads leg when the ball went studs up and all that shit was meant for something very different, no way the lad could get hurt from that challenge, none

think i'm going to try and buy one of these magpie shirts with The Chancellor on the back like