mrmojorisin75

i recon gouffran would be alright as a striker. Shyte anywhere else though. No words. This would be the greatest transfer window in history.

if that game isn't the end of obertan i'm going to self immolate you can quote me You would think the difference in quality would be obvious now like only to those with eyes

if that game isn't the end of obertan i'm going to self immolate you can quote me

well I certainly didn't. what was your prediction out of interest? I had a 10er on us to win. why when our manager is so shit? For the same reason Alan Pardew could take points off them, Chelsea and such. For the same reason plenty teams take points off them every season. They're not fucking invincible. pardew did it twice in 4 years iirc, mclaren has done it in less than a month chill hans

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. i agree it was cowardly in a sense and i'd have gone for aarons but tbf he's trying to build something in his 3rd game in charge and coming away with a point from OT is a good result if we'd conceded then aye, shot with s***, but apparently he's not pardew if we'd brought aarons on and we'd conceded he'd have been shot with s*** for not closing the game off. cant win. cracking point from a far more organised and resilient side, starts and ends there for me. And he'd have been a hero if Aarons scored the winner, it's all hypothetical. It would have been far worse had we conceded due to sitting back and allowing Man Utd the ball though. personally can't argue with much except f***ing obertan, he got it right and we take a point when this period of dodgy games is over though i will :lol:or he can f*** himself aye. this taking points at unbelievably difficult places has to f*** clean off. f*** you on about? why are people acting like in game decisions don't matter? at 60 minutes in the thread we were screaming for change and he waited when they were all over us, when he put tiote on they were all over us and had no attacking outlet he chose to go more defensive and got away with it, it's not such a ludicrous proposition to suggest he should have attacked regardless of how it turned out read my post, i should have highlighted the point i was talking about, but it isn't that hard to understand what I mean tbh. your point appears to be we got a point so it's all ok? perhaps i'm misreading it my point is we got a great point, which nobody saw coming, to call him cowardly as f*** for protecting that point is negativity in the extreme. He'd have got f***ing pelters if he'd gone for the game and got beat. I take the 'hypothetical' point made, so lets focus on the facts instead, he got a great point. We looked very very well organised, for the first time in god knows how long. We'll be here all day if we keep going on about it though, so lets agree to disagree. agreed, was a class point mind...did not expect it, he's now only 1 point away from where he should be if he hadn't made such f***ing terrible personnel decisions in the first two games that's it, lets go again...... fucking kidding me? he got so much wrong in the first 2 games it's actually sad

in fairness hans, i think you're massively underestimating how bad we were in the first two games, at the back especially

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. i agree it was cowardly in a sense and i'd have gone for aarons but tbf he's trying to build something in his 3rd game in charge and coming away with a point from OT is a good result if we'd conceded then aye, shot with s***, but apparently he's not pardew if we'd brought aarons on and we'd conceded he'd have been shot with s*** for not closing the game off. cant win. cracking point from a far more organised and resilient side, starts and ends there for me. And he'd have been a hero if Aarons scored the winner, it's all hypothetical. It would have been far worse had we conceded due to sitting back and allowing Man Utd the ball though. personally can't argue with much except f***ing obertan, he got it right and we take a point when this period of dodgy games is over though i will :lol:or he can f*** himself aye. this taking points at unbelievably difficult places has to f*** clean off. f*** you on about? why are people acting like in game decisions don't matter? at 60 minutes in the thread we were screaming for change and he waited when they were all over us, when he put tiote on they were all over us and had no attacking outlet he chose to go more defensive and got away with it, it's not such a ludicrous proposition to suggest he should have attacked regardless of how it turned out read my post, i should have highlighted the point i was talking about, but it isn't that hard to understand what I mean tbh. your point appears to be we got a point so it's all ok? perhaps i'm misreading it my point is we got a great point, which nobody saw coming, to call him cowardly as fuck for protecting that point is negativity in the extreme. He'd have got fucking pelters if he'd gone for the game and got beat. I take the 'hypothetical' point made, so lets focus on the facts instead, he got a great point. We looked very very well organised, for the first time in god knows how long. We'll be here all day if we keep going on about it though, so lets agree to disagree. agreed, was a class point mind...did not expect it, he's now only 1 point away from where he should be if he hadn't made such fucking terrible personnel decisions in the first two games

in his entire time with us has obertan tracked a runner and put a slide tackle in in the box to block the cross?

he's sensational

i don't agree, he had two choices in front of him: dangerous or safe and he chose safe fuck me good point anyway, delighted tbh

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. i agree it was cowardly in a sense and i'd have gone for aarons but tbf he's trying to build something in his 3rd game in charge and coming away with a point from OT is a good result if we'd conceded then aye, shot with s***, but apparently he's not pardew if we'd brought aarons on and we'd conceded he'd have been shot with s*** for not closing the game off. cant win. cracking point from a far more organised and resilient side, starts and ends there for me. And he'd have been a hero if Aarons scored the winner, it's all hypothetical. It would have been far worse had we conceded due to sitting back and allowing Man Utd the ball though. personally can't argue with much except f***ing obertan, he got it right and we take a point when this period of dodgy games is over though i will :lol:or he can f*** himself aye. this taking points at unbelievably difficult places has to f*** clean off. f*** you on about? why are people acting like in game decisions don't matter? at 60 minutes in the thread we were screaming for change and he waited when they were all over us, when he put tiote on they were all over us and had no attacking outlet he chose to go more defensive and got away with it, it's not such a ludicrous proposition to suggest he should have attacked regardless of how it turned out read my post, i should have highlighted the point i was talking about, but it isn't that hard to understand what I mean tbh. your point appears to be we got a point so it's all ok? perhaps i'm misreading it

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. i agree it was cowardly in a sense and i'd have gone for aarons but tbf he's trying to build something in his 3rd game in charge and coming away with a point from OT is a good result if we'd conceded then aye, shot with s***, but apparently he's not pardew if we'd brought aarons on and we'd conceded he'd have been shot with s*** for not closing the game off. cant win. cracking point from a far more organised and resilient side, starts and ends there for me. And he'd have been a hero if Aarons scored the winner, it's all hypothetical. It would have been far worse had we conceded due to sitting back and allowing Man Utd the ball though. personally can't argue with much except f***ing obertan, he got it right and we take a point when this period of dodgy games is over though i will :lol:or he can f*** himself aye. this taking points at unbelievably difficult places has to fuck clean off. fuck you on about? why are people acting like in game decisions don't matter? at 60 minutes in the thread we were screaming for change and he waited when they were all over us, when he put tiote on they were all over us and had no attacking outlet he chose to go more defensive and got away with it, it's not such a ludicrous proposition to suggest he should have attacked regardless of how it turned out

coward: "a person who lacks the courage to do or endure dangerous or unpleasant things." hans was not wrong in what he said tbf

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. i agree it was cowardly in a sense and i'd have gone for aarons but tbf he's trying to build something in his 3rd game in charge and coming away with a point from OT is a good result if we'd conceded then aye, shot with s***, but apparently he's not pardew if we'd brought aarons on and we'd conceded he'd have been shot with shit for not closing the game off. cant win. cracking point from a far more organised and resilient side, starts and ends there for me. And he'd have been a hero if Aarons scored the winner, it's all hypothetical. It would have been far worse had we conceded due to sitting back and allowing Man Utd the ball though. personally can't argue with much except fucking obertan, he got it right and we take a point when this period of dodgy games is over though i will expect this bullshit to stop or he can fuck himself

nah man, no need for that, throw aarons on and we could win the game and if we lose the game he gets criticised. he done the right thing. now onwards and upwards. i think i said this exact same thing a few posts before you like cowardly isn't the right word, which is why i didn't entirely endorse it in the first place, but he could have gone to attack the game at that stage...aarons and thauvin could have torn them to pieces he chose to close up, and it worked, so fair enough

what? it's literally always been the strongest part of his game I've always thought his best attributes were keeping the ball moving, recycling possession and dropping deep to pick the ball up from the back. and how do you think he achieves all of these things?

I'm not mad. I just remember when Newcastle FC came to Old Trafford and tried to win. Today reminded me of when Exeter got a replay at Old Trafford. "Heroes at the back." "Great defensive performance." Hi Mike. have you ever watched newcastle play manyoo at OT?

nah man, no need for that, throw aarons on and we could win the game

based on what? at this stage i like his quiff, when he slid for that chance his quiff streamed back in the wind and i liked it He has an elegance about him. Love those quick feet as well. i like his quiff and his bird

You really do love the ginger rosy cheeked sod don't you? As I said though, he had the opportunity to replace his attacking winger with another attacking winger with fresh legs but opted to bring on a 3rd central midfielder, and a defensive one at that. This at a time we needed a goal. i agree it was cowardly in a sense and i'd have gone for aarons but tbf he's trying to build something in his 3rd game in charge and coming away with a point from OT is a good result if we'd conceded then aye, shot with shit, but apparently he's not pardew

is there an interception stat in the PL be interested to see how high he is on that list, he's always stealing the ball like

based on what? at this stage i like his quiff, when he slid for that chance his quiff streamed back in the wind and i liked it

didn't expect that, have no qualms i thought he was shot at this level on the other hand manyoo played without a centre forward i suppose, that's when he struggles

what? it's literally always been the strongest part of his game

if we put accurate crosses into the box he's going to score fucking loads