mrmojorisin75

eh? i was doing it on purpose man....

Moron. mods do me a favour, just let me know when the ban ends 'cause the last time i was in the dark and spent ages away from the likes of hughesy who is an utter cunt

a left back and a striker to start!

Plenty of time for doubting. Just not today. ah okey dokey then, good win we rock more shola please

fine then lads, awesome it is, sorry for doubting can't wait for the rest of the season

why can't i be objective about it? the result is what matters to me the performance was fucking shit and we'd have lost to a better team don't see the conflict

That's the stupidest comment I've ever read class, given your stature on the board that puts me right there with cockroaches note to self: try not to reason after a derby game!

I'm not sure what's worse here - your opinion or referring to him as parsnip. Witty.

They didn't have one clear-cut chance in the entire game; his tactics were perfect. Swallow some pride and give him some credit, you biased oaf. if you hadn't used the word oaf i'd have been outraged we scored from a free kick in a game where we were dominated - granted they weren't much better than us but i'm not hanging out the perdew flags for this shit like, luck not good management

i'll deny it, we'd have lost both games if either of them could fucking score - our team selections and tactics have been sickening in both games

what? howay man seriously? Would you rather not have 3points? yes stu, bang on the money as always, i'd rather have lost

this is madness, we didn't win they lost - we won in spite of parsnip not because of him holy shit man

what? howay man seriously?

it's ok, improvement is not really on the agenda

oh and it's an easier choice yeah, but not always the right choice

but this is my point, we were never overrun - it was a pedestrian game that was a load of shit, they were there for the taking but us playing to sholas "strengths" made it easier for them anyway fuck it, sure i'm wrong about shola and pardew, but i'll bet anyone now if shola is our gameplan for the season we are down, simple as that

he fucking picked shola to start man, minutes in it was clear it was an awful decision yet he takes off his own signing ba - laughable man stooge, puppet, fuckwit imo Shola did far more in the first half than Ba. 'cause sholas immobility was more aligned to the 50 yard hoofs we played for most of the game....aye, let's hang ba out to dry then Nobody's hanging Ba out to dry, but you can't always make subs solely based on who's the better player in the abstract. Given how the first half panned out, taking Ba off instead of Shola was 100% the correct decision. i disagree, the entire gameplan was poor from us and changing that would have reaped more dividends than keeping a pathetic system and shit striker (shola) then hoping for the best nothing, NOTHING, in the first half suggested our style of play would succeed yet you're telling me the best decision was to play to shola's strengths as opposed to the strengths of our new guy (who out scored shola last term...)

no he didn't

he fucking picked shola to start man, minutes in it was clear it was an awful decision yet he takes off his own signing ba - laughable man stooge, puppet, fuckwit imo Shola did far more in the first half than Ba. 'cause sholas immobility was more aligned to the 50 yard hoofs we played for most of the game....aye, let's hang ba out to dry then

ah ma, i daren't even ask - what are you saying then? Just that Pardew did change the game from the bench by introducing Obertan, that was the debate we were having. yeah, he changed it from his woeful initial decision, no credit deserved i'm sorry man

ah ma, i daren't even ask - what are you saying then?

he fucking picked shola to start man, minutes in it was clear it was an awful decision yet he takes off his own signing ba - laughable man stooge, puppet, fuckwit imo See my post above. And go easy on the drink, it's only just after five. not where i am

Can you not just respond without the heavy sarcasm? It's borderline at best whether Ba or Shola coming off would give us the best chance to win. I've already said I would have brought Shola off, but to pretend it's clear cut is stupid. that was the least sarcastic thing i posted man, to me from the moment the game started it was cleat cut shola was the wrong choice - said it at the time and repeatedly as he fucked every single thing he tried up dunno man, don't know what you want me to say? the "apologists" tell me i have to accept ba as a real signing rather than a 10m signing...if ba had cost us 10, 15, 20m would anyone accept shola ahead of him?

he fucking picked shola to start man, minutes in it was clear it was an awful decision yet he takes off his own signing ba - laughable man stooge, puppet, fuckwit imo

wow, amazing - he's clearly not even lying here here really changed shit up against arsenal twat He did though, he brought on Obertan and he played well and nearly set up the winner for Cabaye. Doesn't particularly inspire me that the way he changed it was to bin his own new star striker and Carroll replacement after 45 minutes for being shite. the arsenal point wasn't about the change he made, it was about the change he didn't make sad that needs explaining really It isn't about who he brought off, why should that matter? He recognised that the 4-4-2 wasn't working and the strikers were isolated, so he brought one of them off and added Obertan to link the attacks a bit more. Maybe he should have brought Shola off, I would have done, but he made a good change FFS. I don't know what you mean about the "change he didn't make", sorry. shola was the change he didn't make, nothing untoward - i prefer giving yourself a chance to win in football, just me mind