manorpark

I do not think that is true, though I am aware that "some" people didn't rate AG.

A restaurant that is looking to open in the City Centre - https://ivycollection.com/locations/

Yes, P I F are intending to purchase a 49% stake in Newcastle International Airport.

Of course we have a hope - MORE than a hope. May take a while but PIF still do not intend to finish below FIRST. I know that, I knew it before the Takeover was approved, so why don't others?

PIF and the Reubens (and PCP) have done a genuinely excellent job since takeover to date. in my opinion, in terms of ALL financial and stadium-related issues, I would also say . . . W E . . A I N T . . S E E N . . N O T H I N G . . Y E T !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

There is no evidence of any "refusal" (I'm sure it would have strongly been leaked from somewhere) and in any case under the old rules they could not refuse it, only 'reduce it' to some fantasy FMV figure. Under the new rules WE set the figure and they (EPL) have to prove it is not FMV (if they can) which is much more difficult for them and easier for us to dispute.

That is how I understand it also, the onus of proof has been transferred from the clubs to the Premier League. I actually think that this is a big change in our favour, more than for most clubs, because of our rich Saudi business links.

It was a Tribunal, not a legal action in a court of law. We are still actually awaiting the Tribunals final report.

I am simply commenting on what you said babe !!!

If you read my post (a few up from here) you would have seen that the club cannot do it, the club cannot take external legal action against the EPL.

A bit paranoid, no matter what any "Media Noise" emanating from Manchester/London might say!

Who is this "we" ??

The Tribunal did not comment at all about the specific anti-competitive implications for Newcastle United FC. That remains untested legally.

Can anyone suggest something / someone / some group? It is the only way we will ever get anywhere at all

What we need to happen is for someone, some group, some organisation (which satisfies points (1) and (2) above) to take legal action against the EPL under competition law. As far as I can see it is a certain legal win because we have a proven cartel (we knew it already but Man City exposed the letters) and under competition law a CARTEL IS ILLEGAL.

The club simply cannot do that as they signed and agreed the rules of the Premier League when they joined which included a clause that a club CANNOT take legal action against the EPL at all. Other people/groups can take out an anti-competition legal suite, providing they can prove (1) they have been adversely affected by the EPL Cartel and can prove (2) that they have enough money to take the action and pay the EPL costs if they lose. The 'other people' who fulfil the above two criteria could (for example) be a fan group or wealthy individual.

£7M

Yes, I realised that when they officially changed the actual name of "Sky Sports News" to "Sky Sports Lets Talk Arsenal". Then they changed it again to "Sky Sports Lets Talk Manchester United".

Well, could be !!!

The absolute original, from when it started in the 1950s . . .

Sadly, the ITV Regional Channels all closed down many years ago, we only have "ITV" now. The names of the former channels sometimes re-appear for "local news opt-outs" at certain times of the day, but the channels themselves are long gone.

My concern is the incessant (100%) bias in our non-national, national media. This Isak fantasy is just one example amongst many thousands of others. I will never stop calling it out, whenever and WHEREever I can. It is important to always call it out, as (sadly) some people are accepting it as the norm, in fact some people are brainwashed enough to accept it as a form of "truth" . . . now that is worrying.

It is not a conspiracy, but think about how much repeated coverage this one fantasy gets, and will keep on getting! There is no reason for it other than the obsessed pro-London Media. There is no more truth in it other than all clubs fancy all good players. BUT that is not how it is incessantly portrayed by our non-existent National Media. Are you so used to this that you do not notice it any more??

We only know about Arsenal's infantile fantasies about Isak at all because they are based in the same grotty city as the (pretending to be) "national" media. File all this crap in the same bin as all the rest of the made up Cockney media fantasies.