Toon No9

Now, that's a nice kit!

I'd say we were playing a 4-2-3-1 in the 2nd half.

Brighton is not out of it yet. Have five games left but will play us, Man City and Arsenal.

I hope we'll play them again this preseason.

If it would mean Klopp getting sacked, I'd say Liverpool(not seeing that happening though). But with possible new ownership at Man U it would be a big blow for them missing out of CL. Would love it if both misses out and Brighton would end up 4th on last day of the season(with us 3rd of course)!?

Two VAR desicions in favor of Liverpool today(again)! Haven't seen the game so can't say they're right or wrong. Just saying...

From Liam Kennedy, Newcastle World. https://www.newcastleworld.com/sport/football/newcastle-united/newcastle-united-make-controversial-adjustment-to-202324-home-kit-as-old-favourites-return-4132680

Seems like we're going for white socks with our first kit next season! Not a fan of that.

That Arsenal 3rd kit is really nice!

That would be very nice!?

7th place is the lowest we can get now. 7 points from our last 5 games secures 4th place. If other teams drops points less could do. It would probably be enough to beat Leeds and Leicester to secure 4th place. The Brighton game at home could be a huge game for us.

As long as Longstaff is out, we need Joelinton in his place. And that makes room for playing Wilson and Isak together. With Isak on the left obviously.

If we win our games against Leeds and Leicester and get one point against Brighton I think no one can catch us for fourth place.

After watching the replay of the Isak moment for the 6th time I just realised Murphy scored the goal.

Comms on swedish TV is quite the opposite!

Isak is just like when you play Super Mario and get the star and are untouchable! Da, da, da, da, da, Da.(Super Mario music)

ICEMAN!!!!!!!!!

The Toffees got a T-Rex in goal!!!

Oh, it's a done deal then!?

ICEMAN!!!!

Aren't we supposed to play in black and white? Don't like this saudi green and white at all. That's not Newcastle for me. It's like when Cardiffs owner switched from blue to red shirts. I know it's "only" the 3rd kit, but I don't like it.

Same here! I'd rather stick with Longstaff and spend the money on other players.

Well, Botman didn't deliberately pass the ball to the Forest player for their goal either (was meant to go to Pope). So based on that their goal should not have stand either?

VAR is like when you play football at school when you're like 9 years old. You come up with new rules every time you make a mistake and the opponent scores a goal. So the VAR referee could easily be replaced with a random kid from school.

I don't get that VAR decision at all. What is the decision based on? Must be some strange rule that nobody's ever heard of.