Jump to content

B-more Mag

Member
  • Posts

    27,398
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by B-more Mag

  1. B-more Mag

    Marc Guehi

    Supplemental offer 3.B., first, IMO.
  2. I’d take a Morgan Whittaker rumor at this rate.
  3. B-more Mag

    Marc Guehi

    Bah. Ornestien, you fake French cunt!
  4. I wonder what the price for Kubo would be?
  5. B-more Mag

    Marc Guehi

    More like @NUFCWon’t1892, amirite?
  6. B-more Mag

    Marc Guehi

    Ohhhhh. I don’t see “derisory” in there.
  7. Window doesn’t SLAM SHUT until the 30th?
  8. Those are the early Sheffield Rules, I think. Back from the late days of “football” being a hodgepodge of variations and a little before the establishment of the Football Association and the split with the Rugby School (and similar carrying allowed) rules adherents.
  9. B-more Mag

    Marc Guehi

    Disgusting the way you have to understands sports now if you're going to be a professional accounting fan.
  10. B-more Mag

    Marc Guehi

    Hundreds of billions, is my understanding.
  11. What even is going on with the transfer chopper? In for repairs?
  12. Respectully submitting Captain Jerk Steak for consideration.
  13. Howe shouldn't be at RW or LW, IMO.
  14. Oscar Bobb’s your uncle.
  15. 70 year old maître d' at Italian restaurant is a bold styling move.
  16. The Isak/Bruno sweet spot between unobtanium and quasi-"boring" seems super compressed (in the RW market, I mean).
  17. Let's see those xP and xOLL stats.
  18. I wonder if Spurs are planning on keeping both Kulusevski and Johnson?
  19. Gonna have to check and see if the stars spell out his name tonight.
  20. Not a discussion for here, but Major League Baseball (somewhat controversially) has been held by Supreme Court to be generally exempt from U.S. antitrust laws. Not apropos to anything here, just a vaguely interesting fact. Other than that, league rules are generally in the nature of contractual agreements. Under that rubric, parties have freedom to contract as they will — provided that the agreement isn’t violative of applicable law. (That’s U.S., so not necessarily applicable, but it’s basically common law based on English law.)
×
×
  • Create New...