B-more Mag

If this thing ever does go through, my only feeling about Mike Ashley will remain "fuck Mike Ashley, fatally".

Not really sure what this means in terms of banana STR888ness.

Argel Fucks.

Good piece by Chris Waugh in The Athletic Whole thing in spoiler below.

It would have been helpful if someone in this thread had said Fulham were really bad.

Direct correlation with high score on the face-punchability index. That and the memories of all the spinny little turns.

"How did a difference become a disease?"

I assumed the mods/admins always just threw it in neutral but left the engine running.

Over here (so totally irrelevant, but maybe you guys have something like it?), in a civil case, if a party refuses to disclose responsive dox in discovery, or engages in any sort of spoliation, they'd face a presumption that the information in the dox is adverse to them.

Only time I've ever used "gris-gris" and "mojo hand" in a match thread.

There's definitely some sort of inverted cross shit going on.

Boiled chicken head broth at the half.

Hopefully they all touched Bruce's gris-gris sack at the half.

Would be interested to know what the fuck Bruce's mojo hand is, though.

Everything seems normal.

Gonna fucking suck when he scores against us next season. #negativepessamism

Get yer fucking Rob Halford leathers on, Mikey.

Yep. Which creates a duty to publish, but doesn't necessarily mean that publishing a person as such, or not publishing them as such, has any effect on whether the person actually falls within the definition of "Director". I'm not saying it's right, or good, or perfect, or anything -- just that's how you can have a person be a "Director" without being a director.

Ultimately, you have to go through layers of definitions and cross-reference different sections, but it boils down to the term "Director" not being limited to a literal director for corporate governance purposes but also encompassing people who have a level of control that the rules deem sufficient for them to be treated as such:

Sort of unrelated, but live tweeting your legal strategy is almost always not a good move. Maybe it works out for Keith and the rest of us here, and, if so, fair play. But as a rule, fuck no.

This admittedly doesn't squarely answer your question, but one thing I can say with a pretty good degree of certainty, is no reputable lawyer's going to put their ass on the line in a transparent blackmail effort. Having said that, there can be many, many square miles of real estate between between trying to get into a venue where some information may come out that would make the other side super antsy and a "transparent blackmail attempt." So, I think there could be something there. But I'd be pretty reluctant to buy whole hog into the notion that the club's in possession of a nuclear bomb that won't go off if the EPL lets this go through. I'm no fucking help, like.