Ash

It's only a bit of fun. Yep.

No bother. January =

:lol: :lol:

Fuck off you horrible cunt.

In tears here like. Fucking hell.

What's Pulis doing there?

They could have probably got Guthrie for less and he would have been a much better signing. Absolutely. His wage demands probably weren't high enough to warrant QPR being interested.

Won't be long before Jenas is injured again. What a shit signing.

Reminds me of the serial killer from that episode of South Park. The dude with the hands on the wall. :lol:

Stoke.

Bye Xisco, thanks for the memories.

Who?

Krul.

Training with the first team already.

Same as every other day that ends in 'y' then.

Bloody Messi letting everyone down. Missed Ronaldo's goal, was it good?

Here's a mental idea...wait for the teams to come out.

Same outlay? I'd be fuming if we spent that on Ince. Thankfully we wouldn't anyway. Why? You'd be fuming if we spent it on Ince but not on PEA? I wouldn't be bothered at all. Ince is clearly miles better than his division suggests. Sometimes you have to pay going rate Well for a start, Ince can't play up front which is what we need so somebody else would need to follow him in. He's a good player but I wouldn't want to be paying much more than £4m for him though. As for the going rate, it's fine paying it when it's justified. Not many people would bat an eyelid if we spent ~£10m on a versatile front man like PEA or an established striker like van Wolfswinkel. If we spent that money on Ince there would be a lot of queries surrounding the fee, just as has happened with the Zaha transfer. 4m? You'd be lucky to get a player that good for that price. Why is it okay with Van Wolfswinkle, he's not established? He could come here and be absolutely awful? I think if we could get ince for 7/8m it would be a great piece of business. I guarantee he will be worth a lot more in the future Have you not seen our squad? The vast majority were bought for between £4m to £6m. Anyone could sign and be awful, daft argument. To say van Wolfswinkel isn't established is mental too. As has been pointed out, he's OOC at the end of the season so shelling out a good chunk of cash doesn't represent any form of value. He's a player I'd like us to sign but if we were to get quoted a daft amount I'd happily see it spent elsewhere. Established in a completely different football environment. I'm not saying he's not an established player. Obvs anyone can sign and be awful. So whats the difference? we could sign PEA for 10m or ince for 7/8m? PEA has never played here could fail, Ince has played in Eng, could fail. If you think we can continually pick up bargains at 4/5m then fair dues, but we wont forever. Aye, but he's shown he can be successful at a high standard and has played numerous European games, I'd fancy van Wolfswinkel's chances to do well here. I'd also feel a lot more comfortable paying a big fee for him/PEA than paying it for Ince; you'd be taking a bigger risk with him. Not just that but as said earlier, we need somebody capable of playing up top which Ince cannot do which would mean he'd need to be followed by another player making it a big outlay. And again, we'd be idiotic paying so much for someone who'll be free in six months. We might not do it forever but have for the last two and a half years now so there's no reason why what we're doing cannot continue.

Colo, Jonas. Aye, they're really useless. Fuck me.

Thanks nufcjmc. Fingers crossed it turns out to be true!

Anyone remember where this was posted? Can't find it.

Same outlay? I'd be fuming if we spent that on Ince. Thankfully we wouldn't anyway. Why? You'd be fuming if we spent it on Ince but not on PEA? I wouldn't be bothered at all. Ince is clearly miles better than his division suggests. Sometimes you have to pay going rate Well for a start, Ince can't play up front which is what we need so somebody else would need to follow him in. He's a good player but I wouldn't want to be paying much more than £4m for him though. As for the going rate, it's fine paying it when it's justified. Not many people would bat an eyelid if we spent ~£10m on a versatile front man like PEA or an established striker like van Wolfswinkel. If we spent that money on Ince there would be a lot of queries surrounding the fee, just as has happened with the Zaha transfer. 4m? You'd be lucky to get a player that good for that price. Why is it okay with Van Wolfswinkle, he's not established? He could come here and be absolutely awful? I think if we could get ince for 7/8m it would be a great piece of business. I guarantee he will be worth a lot more in the future Have you not seen our squad? The vast majority were bought for between £4m to £6m. Anyone could sign and be awful, daft argument. To say van Wolfswinkel isn't established is mental too. As has been pointed out, he's OOC at the end of the season so shelling out a good chunk of cash doesn't represent any form of value. He's a player I'd like us to sign but if we were to get quoted a daft amount I'd happily see it spent elsewhere.

Same outlay? I'd be fuming if we spent that on Ince. Thankfully we wouldn't anyway. Why? You'd be fuming if we spent it on Ince but not on PEA? I wouldn't be bothered at all. Ince is clearly miles better than his division suggests. Sometimes you have to pay going rate Well for a start, Ince can't play up front which is what we need so somebody else would need to follow him in. He's a good player but I wouldn't want to be paying much more than £4m for him though. As for the going rate, it's fine paying it when it's justified. Not many people would bat an eyelid if we spent ~£10m on a versatile front man like PEA or an established striker like van Wolfswinkel. If we spent that money on Ince there would be a lot of queries surrounding the fee, just as has happened with the Zaha transfer.

Same outlay? I'd be fuming if we spent that on Ince. Thankfully we wouldn't anyway.