dinotheprehistoricgeordie

The ball was dead. I don't understand it either.

Cole almost snapped his leg in two there.

Exactly, the only good thing about Stoke are their defense. FF team is not doing well

Mackems 3-0

City are just ridiculous, amazing football so far.

Sergio Agureo scores

Pie?

No Colo/Jonas/Jose trinity Eesh, don't tempt them.

It's all right Jay Spearing is coming on to save the day. Suarez off and Carroll still on!?

I think I made a mistake picking Jose for FF this week

That's that then.

I think Parky'll be getting a goal today.

fuck me, amazing.

We would have sold him years ago anyway. But imagine the profit Suarez, what a dick.

Modric is just dreamy, if only we'd signed him

Only if Spurs score another. Of course

Would like to see Enrique score one purely for Fantasy Football purposes.

That doesn't really matter. It was ugly, and clearly a yellow card. It really wasn't and it does matter. If you don't know there's a player behind you and you go for a high ball with your foot it isn't a foul. It's raiding your leg, you're still allowed to raise your leg. But as the rules stand, there doesn't have to be intent, unlike say handball, he was high and missed the ball, studs down Parker leg, hence the booking, may not be fair but the ref is right by the rule book, which is s**** by the way on many things. Ok didn't realise that there doesn't have to be intent. I'm still sticking with it was a harsh yellow. Thats why the rules are cack, intent, no intent its crap, the refs aren't allowed to use Discretion, if they were we wouldn't have this intent/no intent stuff.

It's almost as funny as Heskey playing on the wing against us last season.

That doesn't really matter. It was ugly, and clearly a yellow card. It really wasn't and it does matter. If you don't know there's a player behind you and you go for a high ball with your foot it isn't a foul. It's raising your leg, you're still allowed to raise your leg. It stopped Parker in his strides, and was ugly. You can't deny that. A yellow card is very fair. If it's a dangerous high foot it's still a foul. Going of what Bimpy said if there doesn't have to be intent fair enough, but he didn't have a clue that Parker was behind him, calling it ugly implies there was intent behind the action.

That doesn't really matter. It was ugly, and clearly a yellow card. It really wasn't and it does matter. If you don't know there's a player behind you and you go for a high ball with your foot it isn't a foul. It's raiding your leg, you're still allowed to raise your leg. But as the rules stand, there doesn't have to be intent, unlike say handball, he was high and missed the ball, studs down Parker leg, hence the booking, may not be fair but the ref is right by the rule book, which is shite by the way on many things. Ok didn't realise that there doesn't have to be intent. I'm still sticking with it was a harsh yellow.

That doesn't really matter. It was ugly, and clearly a yellow card. It really wasn't and it does matter. If you don't know there's a player behind you and you go for a high ball with your foot it isn't a foul. It's raiding your leg, you're still allowed to raise your leg. Not with studs up. You're not allowed to raise your leg with studs up? So in the game of football you can only raise your leg in a certain way?

That doesn't really matter. It was ugly, and clearly a yellow card. It really wasn't and it does matter. If you don't know there's a player behind you and you go for a high ball with your foot it isn't a foul. It's raising your leg, you're still allowed to raise your leg.

It was but the first one for pulling, daft booking pulling a shirt like, players never learn. To be fair referees are really inconsistent with enforcing this rule.

Harsh yellow like, Adam didn't have a clue Parker was there.