Geordie Ahmed

That usually means it's pointless having training on and you might as well fly off to Portugal

But a season ticket holder has a ticket, that is their reward Obviously it's tough to find a solution where everyone is happy but allowing members to have priority then ST and then general sale seems fairer imo, though I accept I speak from a position of bias What is clear is that long term there needs to be a solution because our current stadium isn't big enough

Fully agree with this They should restrict it to Members first, then ST and then General sale Otherwise seems a little unfair on members

I'm 8 mins away but I don't recall logging in anywhere so I have a feeling this will happen to me

It's like it's full of those people that take an age at the cash point

What about Season Ticket holders? They'll still be able to purchase a ticket won't they?

https://news.sky.com/video/southampton-tyler-dibling-16-scores-three-identical-goals-for-hat-trick-in-b-team-fixture-against-newcastle-12599753#:~:text=News | Sky News-,Southampton's Tyler Dibling%2C 16%2C scores three identical goals for hat,2 game%2C 4-2.

If true wonder if it's that lad that scored a hat-trick against us where all goals were pretty much identical

If he does, he'll be considered shit and past it, if he rejects us then well it will be funny a world class player rejected us They have all bases covered

I think that is what is really upsetting them, the majority of the football world has just gotten on with it and they need everyone to despise us like they do They've convinced themselves that all these signings (which are also shit in their minds, go figure) mean nothing to us because we are raging that everyone hates us

It's all a coping mechanism, they can't bring themselves to credit any of our signings. They rubbished the Bruno signing by suggesting if he was any good better teams would have signed him What's utterly mental though is that they have seen Bruno play and a lot of them still try to claim he's average, they are broken so they have to resort to such nonsense Apparently Botman can't be good because he hasn't played for the Dutch National side, even though he's only 22 whilst Van Dijk was 24 when he made his debut for his country I hope we sign at least 2 more top players, it will destroy them and no doubt they'll plunge even deeper into nonsense to try and cope with it

That to me shows how serious they are and should allay any fears people have that they won't spend Could easily have said pointless wasting money for the next few years as we'll be building a proper facility

We have countless other examples in the league that is corrupt, this isn't it Though I can't wait until a PIF owned company does sponsor us, the fewm will leave the atmosphere

Aye, he scored twice against Liverpool in a huge title race game I think he's a quality player and will do very well for Arsenal

I get that their intentions aren't to make football more competitive and it's to keep the top clubs at the top but including spending on infrastructure and women's team is ludicrous

Yes because he can't get in the Dutch National side Using Mackem logic, Van Dijk is shite cos he didn't make his International debut until he was 24

Delighted with this, even though I've never really seen him play but it's a statement signing. Also makes a mockery of all those that kept saying sod him, we need to move on. Just shows the club know what they are doing.

Such a good signing, excellent value too To think we've almost signed a new back 5 for around £50m, all with PL experience and all homegrown, not glamourous but bloody sensible

Absolutely no chance Woodman went for £10m or anywhere near that

This is not a glamorous signing but it's a sensible signing, happy enough with it

So he admits to not paying any money for the SD tat but blames the takeover for it

Agreed, it was funny but as is often the case with all things Mackem it was short lived and we've been laughing since

I thought how you pay is irrelevant to FFP? So spreading payments over 5 years or one lump sum is considered one and the same when calculating profit/loss?

I'm happy to wait, absolutely, I was patient in January and I'll be patient again as I trust the ownership and the manager I do think no further signings would be worrying, though I'd still like to look at the bigger picture and see it as better than Ashley but no signings would mean something seriously has gone wrong somewhere. Though I'm absolutely certain that won't be the case and we will make signings.

I agree, in that scenario getting 3 prospects is better but that poster was suggesting he wouldn't be too fussed if we went with the squad as it is, which suggests no further signings, that's ludicrous