I actually like the way you bet. Logic behind a side and then bet big on it. Sometimes you're a bit mad with Scandavian teams in Europe though. I won a fair bit from Stabaek, Rosenborg and Bodo/Glimt tips from you though.
Now give me Freeman.
Aye, great post. I suffer from being lazy. Can't be arsed looking through the odds a lot of the time.
I do like to go high stakes on singles though. An example of what I'd be looking at this game week is Swansea vs. Stoke. Swansea are 6/5 to score over 1.5 goals. Alright they had a 0-0 with Everton recently, but four of their last five they've scored 2 or more, including against Spurs and Man United. Would genuinely be tempted by £30-50 on it.
Ireland: Randolph; Coleman, McShane, Keogh, Brady; McClean, Whelan, McCarthy, Hendrick; Murphy, Long
What do you reckon triggs? Hoolahan in for Murphy maybe.
Look at the bets they put for these challenges man. They're the most obscure games possible. It's luck when it comes through because nobody has a notion about any of the teams. It's basically faith in the bookies odds.
Now if you suggested doing the challenge based on European football then I could see the appeal. An example being Man City to beat Newcastle, or Man City to score two or more against Newcastle. I'd be all over that.
All of you know how to bet properly and don't need to copy anyone. You know your football, and instead of going for four, five, six team plus accys you should be raising your initial stake and going for singles or doubles instead.
Everyone likes to go for the big win though, including myself. This is where the bookies win.