Froggy

There's only one team that hasn't lost across the Champions League, Europa League and Conference League. It ain't Frankfurt or Athletic.

Treat 'em mean, keep 'em keen.

That's the conference league mate. The one you'll be playing in next year. Show some respect.

Correct.

What if they win it?

Rashford is £40m. I'd imagine we would probably subsidise some of his wage as well if he was to move permanently.

In 12/13? That wasn't a bad side.

Bookies have stopped taking odds on the Europa League. We're dead certs to win it.

Champions League brings in a lot of money mate.

Look at the one two posts below it.

They need to replace them sooner or later.

I do think Giggs has ended up underrated because he's a sex pest. Agree on Suarez though. A lot of the goals were insane as well.

I'm not sure I've ever played Subbuteo. Feels wrong.

This is why I prefer eye tests over stats because stats can be misread. Can we go back to talking about how Martial's stats were better than Isak's in their first season?

Nope I just had a mare and was only counting him at Chelsea.

Either way you get the point I was trying to make.

It's not all about numbers. Chris Wood was outscoring Isak for most of the season has he not? Isak is 20x the player Wood is. Edit: Because I'm wrong.

Yeah. Made a bit of a mockery of the award that. He probably still had like 20 assists that season mind.

Not for me. Invisible against PSG and Newcastle in crucial games. Reckon Dembele is the man this year.

This is where it comes down to opinion, but I think Giggs had multiple seasons that were better than Bale in 12/13. Bale and Suarez were both incredible though so it's a fair argument either way. If longevity at an extremely high level is the bar, then Giggs goes in over Henry. Giggs was tearing teams apart as a teenage winger in the early 90's, and controlling games as a 39 year old central midfielder in the 2010's. His highest level isn't as high as Henry's though. Could be an interesting debate though and would be interesting to see how people's teams would differ.

It's not always bait son. That's just the truth. Ashley Cole's peak is higher than Irwin's, but did he perform at a high level for as long as Irwin? No. EDIT: (ignore this, Froggy's not well) Kyle Walker's peak is higher than Neville's, but did he perform at a high level for as long as Neville. No. etc. etc. You still put Ashley Cole in at left back in an all time XI, because his highest level was better than anyone else's in that position.

Ronaldo was literally the best player in the world while in the Premier League. Salah has been at a high level for a longer period, but never a higher level. It's just recency bias from someone not old enough to have seen the players talked about in their prime. If we're talking about sustained high levels, then the all time Premier League team would just be a Man United team plus Shearer.