Scoot

Aye, it always ends up having summit to do with us. We're all seething.

Couldn't agree more.

Asking to be sacked playing that twat upfront.

ALL Newcastle fans used to be "massive lads fans" up until 1992. Then they all just decided to stop supporting s*nderland and started to support Newcastle because Newcastle started doing well in 1992, apparently.

it continues... http://rokerreport.sbnation.com/2016/10/7/13200240/rrs-newswipe-the-national-press-is-this-the-reason-safc-get-a-hard They really are the most pathetic bunch of supporters on the planet aren't they?

Ugly racists in here.

As much as Gouffran has played well since coming back into the side, it should be him that's dropped for Atsu with Ritchie on the other wing.

A few days before. Rotherham was announced about a week and a half ago. I read that it was going to be televised weeks ago. Possibly on here.

Not happy about that boxing day change. Looks like i'll be fucking arseholed sitting in my seat after a full day on the drink. Was hoping it stayed at 3pm so I could do the majority of my drinking after the game and not before.

From that thread: Christ, if they expand further they'll need a fork-lift to deliver the pile of free tickets to the local schools, call centres and needle exchanges... 'beuatiful' "Even one of the blokes that built the extra bits says its a carbuncle." I'm sure he did. 65,000, why on earth do they think that will happen sooner rather than later? What planet do these dim fuckers live on? Imagine what that will look like on TV man. 36,000 of them in a 65,000 pink seater flat pack stadium. They'll look even more pathetic than they do now. They just don't live in reality at all on all subjects Newcastle and s*nderland.

Mitro in that suit.

Nah. Dwight Gayle just happens to rhyme with Brown Ale. Would work just as well if, for instance, Tony Gale became our future manager. Of course, I'd never live to see it with having to immediately shoot myself in the head and all. Bloody racist.

This is just so racist.

WTF is that, wow the amount of "it's all about us" in their Yedlin piece is staggering. I'm not about to defend Ryder but these are pretty stock questions, no matter who the player has played for before. The ironic thing is they slate him for being back up to Anita, but they know full well he would start at RB for them, who as they like to remind us are in the Premier League. That whole article is filled with negative, "poor me" s***, which sums up the state of their club perfectly. That article is hilarious. Why on fucken earth do they think its all about them? Proper bunch of fucking weirdos.

I reckon they're furious about that article.

But at least after that one there's nowt until March.

Me too, form a queue and you can suck both our balls bitches I was only 8 in October 1992 when I went to my first match. I suppose I'm one too. I apologise for when i was born to any viewing mackems.

My first game was a 1-0 win over Tranmere Rovers on 10th October 1992, I'd just turned 8. That win made it 10/10 wins at the start of the 1992/93 season. David Kelly scored the goal.

It makes a nice change to have options there rather than 2 fit centre backs and then no one as has been the case for the last 2 or 3 years. Plus we've had shite centre halves for years now up until this season.

It's quite telling that on here the Sunderland thread often gets derailed onto NUFC stuff, whereas on RTG................ Tells it's own story does that.

Why can't it be Defoe? He's fucken bullet proof that little c***. You can guarantee if we only had 1 striker (who actually scores) to see us through the entire season, he'd snap his leg on September 2nd.

That's impossible. Football didn't start until 1992 marra. Apparently.

the f*** you on about Tommy the Dog man!!! You not nar him? cant remember him, i remember some daft f***er in the east stand doing an indian cry.......i started REALLY going 82 onwards although 1976 was my first match I don't know of tommy either so you aren't alone.