JUICE690

Let's be honest, that defending was awful. I'm scoring that.

In that quote masters is saying rules are still in place. No idea on the timeline, mind. (I'd assumed they had come after the ruling). The article (and subsequent ones) are saying they're all in the bin. Let's just see I guess.

The bottom of the article reads: WHAT HAPPENED TODAY AND WHAT DOES IT MEAN? The panel returned its final verdict on the first challenge and found that the rules in their entirety were unlawful - effectively agreeing with City. There are various potential ramifications. The verdict effectively means that for three years the Premier League operated an APT system that was null and void. As a result, any club that saw a deal blocked or reduced in value during that period could sue. City will also seek payment of their costs. Combined with the Premier League costs, that figure could total around £20m. The same panel will now rule on the latest APT rules, voted through in November. Should they return a similar verdict, it could open the door for clubs like City and Newcastle to pen significantly higher deals with related parties. It would also pile pressure on the Premier League itself.

Basically saying that although some rules were deemed to be unlawful it doesn't mean that the entire APT rulebook should be null and void. Though they said that before and now even the amended rules have been found to be unlawful. --- The 18-page final award, seen by Mail Sport, states: ‘In the First Partial Final Award it was declared that the APT Rules and Amended APT Rules were unlawful in three respects. ‘There now arises for decision the question whether those three respects can be severed from the remaining APT Rules so that those remaining APT Rules are valid and enforceable. ‘The three respects in which the APT Rules and Amended APT Rules were unlawful cannot be severed with the result that the APT Rules as a whole are void and unenforceable.’ ---

Wankers.

Sorely miss Jackson.

He only cupped his ear, right? Hardly goading them is it.

Strongest bench in the league, Liverpool? Genuinly know idea, always looks decent to me though.

Liverpool are so good at taking advantage of lose balls. Make a single mistake and you'll pay for it.

They just always win.

The Isak reveal sounds like a skip being dropped.

Would hate to have my name fit that White Stripes tune if I was a footballer.

Get the place rocking again and they'll shit it. Big part of the reason they don't want to play us away.

Should be strung up as a warning to others.

Going forward we look ok but when they break our midfield we look shaky as fuck, Livermento can't handle their left winger. He did shit all to stop the cross for the missed header. The goal was nuts, 1 in a 100 chance that hits the back of the net. Their crowd has been fantastic, making a huge difference for them. Osula looks good but needs better composure. It's annoying because there is a clear difference in abilty but we just aren't taking advatage of it. I'm uneasy.

Great going forward. But defence is shocking so far.

Wow.

lol

Liverpools bench is, enviable.

They have bench that allows it.

Spurs playing league 2 football.

Drury desperate to read one of his Salah poems.

Me with all this content.

Isak aimed for the post I reckon, set up Murph.