Manxst

aye… - Premier League clubs may not register more than two players on loan at any one time. - The maximum number of loans registrable in the same season is four, and, under no circumstances, shall more than one be from the same club at any one time. - Premier League clubs cannot loan to another Premier League club a player they have acquired in the same transfer window. - A Premier League club may loan not more than one of its goalkeepers to another Premier League club.

Can’t loan him with VDB also there?

Should take a look at his beloved Gooners midfield and start suggesting they get Ramsey back there tbh.

Long term, yes, but right now they’re pushing for a CL spot vs our relegation battle?

They won’t have. It’ll include the amount Spurs still have outstanding for him, from OL.

Nothing like the amount being a free agent though!

Because him and his agent would miss out on a massive (and probably last) signing on fee as a free agent in the summer? £££’s

Turned down the Mags, marra.

I remember breaking the woodgate signing on the forum (under my previous name). Could’ve sworn it was summer, but I’ll take your word- I was bouncing off walls at the news!

Neil Lennon an early favourite for the job

Looks like a leggy Tino from my 3 minute video review! Bring him home!

??? ok….maybe could’ve done that in previous January’s…?

A shot for every time Newcastle is mentioned….???

Might be that we have to go with just deregistering some. Not ideal, but needs must.

I mentioned him earlier. He’s definitely a possibility for the ‘bid’.

Jonathan David please. ?

He’s seemingly not though…!

Report says we’re also looking to get Lingaard and Henderson also, so it would have to mean one of those is a potential permanent transfer rather than loan…

Yep. But the wage limit and not wanting to annoy Jonjo is straight up genuine.

Nah. Judging by your posts I know where you stand on the matter. I’ll bow out for a while here. Might be good if you do some reading yourself…

Your prior post suggested that being ‘put with the nonces…despite being legally innocent’ might be seen as an unjust occurrence?

No one has said otherwise, I don’t think? It’s why I’ve mentioned trial….after being charged.

So? If he gets put on remand, then there would have to be specific reasons why that is the case. Just because there hasn’t been a conclusion to his potential trial to give him a guilty or not verdict, doesn’t mean he can’t or shouldn’t be remanded.

Oh, I’m well aware…which is why I said ‘address’ and tried to mean specifically to their face etc.

Of course the judiciary don’t refer to them in court as ‘the victim’- that’s more than a little demeaning to them! The police and CPS don’t address the individual purely by that title either, but legally, that’s what they are.