In what way?
Yeah not particularly enlightening IMO. She doesn't really seem to have her finger on the pulse of what's gone on to be honest. "If they [Premier League] had ongoing dialogue with PIF within a reasonable timeframe its difficult to prove they delayed the test".. What gives her the impression this was a reasonable time frame? I mean its to be proven either way obviously but she's saying that as if it seems very likely it was reasonable, which it doesn't at all. Wether it was or wasn't looking in from the outside, going by all previous OD tests, it looks excessively long in the extreme. That's before we even talk about info we've heard about the question they were asking being answered numerous times and still asked again repeatedly. Now people can say the answer might not have been acceptable to the PL, but the response to that is to make a decision based on that unacceptable answer. Not to just keep repeating the question again and again, that's absolutely a delaying tactic in anybody's book.
I disagree here and I think this is one of the reasons she’s come under so much flack on Twitter. She’s offering an opinion on what’s likely from a legal perspective not her own personal opinion. She isn’t claiming to have her finger on the pulse on the deal or what’s happening in the arbitration process. She’s consistently pointed out legal flaws in what the fan group has claimed what was possible with the separate legal proceedings, taken flack for it only to be proven right.
I’m all for being hopeful about the takeover/legal proceedings but it has to be based in realism. Anyone offering anything that doesn’t tow the line that’s happening (especially on Twitter has been getting hounded).
That said, I thought the vid was hopeful and informative on the position of DeMarco, what the arbitration process was and the many outcomes that could potentially come from it. She said it wouldn’t be hard to create a legal argument that the decision had been influenced from outside sources.
In what way? Yeah not particularly enlightening IMO. She doesn't really seem to have her finger on the pulse of what's gone on to be honest. "If they [Premier League] had ongoing dialogue with PIF within a reasonable timeframe its difficult to prove they delayed the test".. What gives her the impression this was a reasonable time frame? I mean its to be proven either way obviously but she's saying that as if it seems very likely it was reasonable, which it doesn't at all. Wether it was or wasn't looking in from the outside, going by all previous OD tests, it looks excessively long in the extreme. That's before we even talk about info we've heard about the question they were asking being answered numerous times and still asked again repeatedly. Now people can say the answer might not have been acceptable to the PL, but the response to that is to make a decision based on that unacceptable answer. Not to just keep repeating the question again and again, that's absolutely a delaying tactic in anybody's book. I disagree here and I think this is one of the reasons she’s come under so much flack on Twitter. She’s offering an opinion on what’s likely from a legal perspective not her own personal opinion. She isn’t claiming to have her finger on the pulse on the deal or what’s happening in the arbitration process. She’s consistently pointed out legal flaws in what the fan group has claimed what was possible with the separate legal proceedings, taken flack for it only to be proven right. I’m all for being hopeful about the takeover/legal proceedings but it has to be based in realism. Anyone offering anything that doesn’t tow the line that’s happening (especially on Twitter has been getting hounded). That said, I thought the vid was hopeful and informative on the position of DeMarco, what the arbitration process was and the many outcomes that could potentially come from it. She said it wouldn’t be hard to create a legal argument that the decision had been influenced from outside sources.