-
Posts
22,856 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Tiresias
-
I was convinced for quite a while that we played our best when I wasn't able to watch us. This culminated in when i sacrificed watching us while in toon to spend time with a friend who didnt give a shit about newcastle when we were playing against spurs at home last season. Was fucking fuming. I remember sat with a drink outside cluney and i swear could hear the goals going in from there. Then i started to avoid watching us quite often lol.
-
I assume bruno was shouting I HATE YOU IM OFF TO PSG at crowd there
-
haha tiny arms
-
Hope Big Jow is ok, would have been shoe in for motm had second half gone like first
-
Well done Dubs not sure he knew anything about it but that would have been a flukey deflection
-
Their defence are going to get run out of town aren't they all up for sale to save their lives
-
GET THE FUCK IN
-
Need a second to settle nerves. Look all over them which will make the 80th minute equalizer all the more galling
-
Joelinton our best player so far
-
Was going to comment imagine if he'd pulled it off the defender would have to retire immediately
-
Those mackems in the crowd just there looked relatively normal where the fuck did they find them?
-
I think that was the absolute definition of running into trouble there from miggy, gets good breaks and just angles his run directly towards their defensive line when could have got past them, so frustrating at times
-
Greatest of all derby goals, the own goal
-
GET IN
-
Absolute stonewaller there, know what way this game is going to go ffs
-
Longstaff should score that ffs
-
Clearly going down the making a career out of claiming to not have a career due to being cancelled route, which works surprisingly well for whining snowflakes like Barton considering their apparent 'silencing' lol. Just going to do my best to ignore the cunt.
-
I have an almost irrational hatred of the double pivot, not that it isn't possibly useless but there was a period where every team was playing 4-2-3-1 with 2 players in midfield sat in front of a back 4 and there weren't many goals
-
ok i'm in
-
That is a fair point, but I don't see how ditching ffp does anything but flood more money into the market, upping player prices even more, yes we can outspend but still will just be spending wars between us and city and the league gets even worse, i dont get the need for that
-
I know there isn't any way it will happen but wage cap would hurt them and help everyone else. It's just not true it's impossible to restrict the top 6, but from the league's perspective they always want to be able to sign the most expensive players so arent going to go down that route. FFP isn't going to go either. But we will you know one day have proper revenue coming in, and we will be able to sell a player or £100m every window to fund 3 or 4 coming in. It's fine, it's frustrating now but it'll be fine.
-
Oh seems the post went...anyway above still my response to that line of attack
-
Right but this is why it is set up like it is, it's no coincidence the rules the league could pass are the ones that don't inhibit their spending but screw the rest of us. I totally get that. It's obnoxious because it is a half done job. We totally should be tackling clubs spending more than they can afford, but we should also be making it so clubs don't need to spend that much money to compete in the league. The latter part will always be vetoed however. Is the solution to allow the Leeds uniteds of the world to spend beyond their means? Maybe, I am open maybe to that being the case but how do you put a rule in saying clubs that can afford it can spend it, every owner 'claims' they can afford it. Ditching ffp would likely result in more clubs spending more money, the top 6 would spend more too cos they have plenty of financial headroom, we could outspend the lot so yes we would do well out of it, is that so different a self interest than the situation you describe? I'd much rather some actual financial fair play where clubs weren't priced out and we have to win it on merit.
-
Honestly, I think a lot of the controversy would be diminished if it was accurately named, "spending limits to stop clubs like Everton spending their way into big debt and thus into oblivion, or rather punish them mildly with the faint hope it discourages others" should be the name, it is absolutely not about sporting fairness or equality at all, in fact the unfortunate side effect is the disproportionate income available to the entrenched super clubs magnifies their spending power. I know it's a little daft with clubs with owners who can no questions ask afford so the spending wouldnt endanger anyone but if those owners are serious and long term they will build up the income to allow the spending, it just takes a little while as ours will. There are seperate rules that could be put in place to make things a lot fairer. Wage caps etc but the league will never pass them. But they put fairness in the name of financial fair play so it looks like they are doing something to help when they're not. It doesn't actually mean FFP is totally bad idea tbh, happy to debate the mechanisms, they may well be daft but I think clubs spending within their means is a good policy, but it's way more about stopping clubs loading themselves with debt to just stay in league and then going bankrupt.
-
100%. Looking at us recently we are glaringly open at the back and that surely has to be addressed and I'm not sure I see it. I remember when last season started we went through a very very sturdy at the back first half of the season but weren't initially scoring enough goals. Howe said he sacrificed a bit of defensive solidity to get us to score more then Miggy went on that run and a lot clicked. Howe needs to get the team back to that solidity even if we lose a bit in attack because the balance is all wrong right now. While we have never been a possession based team we certainly didnt seem to give the ball away so easily before.