NUFC

Put Colback in the reserves ffs makes too many stupid fouls

11 Sunderland players have been bummed at Turf Moor, an image of the suspect has been released http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/smiling-andre-gray-of-burnley-before-the-sky-bet-championship-match-picture-id504718194?s=594x594

Wonder whether he just suits the PL more. The FL is a very physical league and i dont think he can cope with it, so hes stopped trying. Its strange as he used to be quite a hard working player, never stopped running etc

Have a day off man, wasn't a red Ball gone, kicked Anita knee high. Red card, violent conduct Is wrong on all levels

Have a day off man, wasn't a red

We always play rubbish against the physical teams, we struggled against Wolves at home who were really physical too

deserved goal for Wednesday tbh

Pardew's League Record in 2016 P 35 W 6 D 8 L 21 Pts 24 out of possible 105

Is though http://i.imgur.com/69RUtRy.png http://i.imgur.com/77uApJI.png lunging ✓ two footed ✓ studs up ✓ Sorry, but did you see the foul? Or are you just posting images that doesn't tell the true story? I have seen the foul properly (not by screenshots) and its definitely correct, at one point he as both feet off floor he is therefore no longer in control of the tackle, that then becomes excessive force and therefore is a red card.

Maybe he's proud of himself Get in Rafa

It's not even a f***ing foul, people saying Shelvey did anything wrong here, I don't get it. He's just trying to get up Howay man, he blatantly kicks out at Lansbury with his foot. Its a blatant red for Shelvey, but its never a penalty. If it happened in the penalty area its a penalty

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off. That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion. Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself) That was an accidental foul by dummett. If you don't believe that then you need your life checking out tbh. Nobody disagrees with that! You said the ref didn't know the laws, where actually he got it wrong. You said it's a red, which it's not. Its not automatically a red but still can be

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off. That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion. Post it then. http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10242286/ifab-anounces-law-changes-softening-rules-on-fouls-in-the-penalty-area Er Neesy, in that article Players will still be sent off for holding, pulling or pushing, not playing the ball or having no possibility to play the ball, serious foul play, violent conduct or deliberate handball

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off. That's last year's rule, it doesn't include the double punishment exclusion. Nope that's this years laws (I'm a ref myself)

Even if you think Dummett's was a pen, the new rule is that it's not also a red card. No. Not automatically a red card. Red is still entitled to send him off. You need to read the rules So do you.... Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned unless: The offence is holding, pulling or pushing or The offending player does not attempt to play the ball or there is no possibility for the player making the challenge to play the ball or The offence is one which is punishable by a red card wherever it occurs on the field of play (e.g. serious foul play, violent conduct etc.) In all the above circumstances the player is sent off.

correct so the ref doesn't even know the laws of the game Wrong

And? Don't have to make contact for it to be a red card

Sorry like that's not handball His arm is down by his side, its not in an unnatural position

Shelvey's kicked out so it can only be red and a penalty

fuck off shelvey useless prick

Its not a legal case which would require evidence to be beyond reasonable doubt, as its only an FA charge it will be balance of probabilities. Id presume Wolves will use the player who allegedly overheard what was said and Shelvey will use his own witness. Id be surprised if some kind of person who specialises in lip reading is used too

As if he uses head and shoulders. He was Mr Sheen above everyone, better?

He does want to be a manager in his own right so can see it happening

Turning on Woodman too https://www.holmesdale.net/page.php?id=106&tid=163764

I reckon the academy needs changing from the top, starting with Joe Joyce, he's the academy director and should be responsible for the lack of players progressing from our academy to first team, he has been at the club since 2006 and I think the academy needs a shakeup as its obviously not working as the u18s are getting beat every week.