Jump to content

triggs

Member
  • Posts

    28,434
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by triggs

  1. hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Well it is the case, but the PL probably don't really care about that, they clearly do care that Saudi Arabia has been stealing their product from them. They have their priorities right then. Their remit is to run the football league, not override our govt and decide who is and isn't personally responsible for deaths of thousands. Trump and Boris to this day haven't fingered MBS personally, far as I know he blew it off with some bull about bodyguards acting without his permission and Trump and Boris lapped it up readily. In fact wouldn't surprise me if they didn't suggest it in a memo. Ok so let's just go through what you've said here: 1. PIF directors haven't killed anyone 2. Well if they had killed anyone then the PL would have dismissed their case straight away. 3. The PL don't care about them killing people, they have their priorities right All of them are right actually. Because if MBS is the name you are going to put to it, he hasn't actually killed anyone. Someone else might have done it on his behest, but that's not for the PL to decide, so they have got their priorities right. How are they right? Number 2 and 3 contradict each other Did Hitler not kill anyone either then? All that has been answered in the post you replied to. The only new point you brought up was Hitler, and the decision was taken at govt level that he was a murderer and that is why all sporting relations were stopped with Germany. If you want to draw a comparison, we've just had a govt directive which appears to support the investment from the Saudis in NUFC. Does that mean we are aiding and abetting a murderous regime right at the very top level? Yes it does
  2. hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Well it is the case, but the PL probably don't really care about that, they clearly do care that Saudi Arabia has been stealing their product from them. They have their priorities right then. Their remit is to run the football league, not override our govt and decide who is and isn't personally responsible for deaths of thousands. Trump and Boris to this day haven't fingered MBS personally, far as I know he blew it off with some bull about bodyguards acting without his permission and Trump and Boris lapped it up readily. In fact wouldn't surprise me if they didn't suggest it in a memo. Ok so let's just go through what you've said here: 1. PIF directors haven't killed anyone 2. Well if they had killed anyone then the PL would have dismissed their case straight away. 3. The PL don't care about them killing people, they have their priorities right All of them are right actually. Because if MBS is the name you are going to put to it, he hasn't actually killed anyone. Someone else might have done it on his behest, but that's not for the PL to decide, so they have got their priorities right. How are they right? Number 2 and 3 contradict each other Did Hitler not kill anyone either then?
  3. hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Well it is the case, but the PL probably don't really care about that, they clearly do care that Saudi Arabia has been stealing their product from them. They have their priorities right then. Their remit is to run the football league, not override our govt and decide who is and isn't personally responsible for deaths of thousands. Trump and Boris to this day haven't fingered MBS personally, far as I know he blew it off with some bull about bodyguards acting without his permission and Trump and Boris lapped it up readily. In fact wouldn't surprise me if they didn't suggest it in a memo. Ok so let's just go through what you've said here: 1. PIF directors haven't killed anyone 2. Well if they had killed anyone then the PL would have dismissed their case straight away. 3. The PL don't care about them killing people, they have their priorities right
  4. hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Like talking to a brick wall
  5. hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people Tedious, if the takeover goes through I trust you won’t be going to games then? I only show up when blatant lies are reported as fact. This isn't the propaganda thread btw mate, there's a positive news thread if that's all you want to see. I've already answered your question about 5 times so look it up Oh, I’ve never asked you the question before so an answer would be nice. It's irrelevant. If I say I do go to matches does that make my comment above incorrect? I won't be going to matches fwiw
  6. hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people Tedious, if the takeover goes through I trust you won’t be going to games then? I only show up when blatant lies are reported as fact. This isn't the propaganda thread btw mate, there's a positive news thread if that's all you want to see. I've already answered your question about 5 times so look it up
  7. hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people
  8. Never a good sign when a new signing refers to good chippies being one of the reasons for moving clubs
  9. What's her politics got to do with it? It could be Labour Jim from Sunderland or SNP Stewart from Glasgow and I would still be saying the same. She got called a liar in a trial, person who said it needs beheading IMO
  10. Lovely to see Newcastle fans uniting in defence of the horrendous treatment of massive Tory Amanda Staveley
  11. The amount of time he was injured for a keeper was ridiculous
  12. McClaren reminds of that Bad Luck Brian meme. Tragic bloke these days
  13. Man City is the only relevant one and that was over 10 years ago
  14. A report piece not an opinion piece. He described the potential for Man United to be bought by SA as 'doomsday for football.' Get out of here with your pesky facts
  15. All we want is a club that tries has way more money than everybody else
  16. We were actually starting to play a bit better before the games stopped and Bruce finally changed it up a bit
  17. Pity it's the worst Premier League season ever
  18. Ashley isn't exactly the most outspoken owner at the best of times mind
  19. He made a bad mistake in the last game he played at wing back and then was used as a winger from then on for a few games wasn't it?
  20. Its quite a weird situation in that who is actually negotiating with him? Charnley still? Surprised Ashley would bother sanctioning it if he's on the way out
  21. triggs

    Sunderland

    Didn't they pay obscene amounts for a cryo chamber that was used exclusively by Martin Bain?
×
×
  • Create New...