Twinport53

More concerned about him on the ball. Poor first touch, then poor passing. Fortunately the player himself has said he recognised he had a poor game. He's clearly aware he didn't play well, so stop posting useless shit as if it's some miraculous insight none of us can comprehend or acknowledge.

This is what I don't get He's clearly back up, and replaced Anita in the squad. Yet people are getting pissed off as if he's gonna start 25+ games. Yedlin will come back in.

And yet Mitrovic's wasn't a free kick. Make your mind up. Honestly despise the extent to which diving has become acceptable. I could just about understand being entitled to go down when there's contact because it's vindicated by the lack of pens given when players stay on their feet despite being impeded. Actively looking to dive when there's no contact and literally no reason to go down though? That's where we're at now? Honestly, f*** off forever with that s***. I'm taking the piss.

You've had to many spirits 54.

Loads. Aye. Just choruses of "On ya bike Rafa, we've found a new gafa." Followed by "Paco Paco Paco".

I'm with Lee Ryder, he's entitled to dive.

Pretty much exactly what he's doing. Jesus Gamez mugging Swansea off today ffs I'm happy for other fans to think we have a championship team. West Ham thought the same, Swansea now. Stoke probably will, apart from a fear of Joselu returning with a goal against them.

Good job you are wrong, and he creates goals and assists on top of his ridiculous work rate.

Love how Sky built the hype around Sanchez, who then miss places every other pass and kicks Joselu in the cock. Only for Merino to run the game. This guy is da bomb.

What a brave bloke.

I wish some foreigns would come on this board and push Stilfer out.

Was a foul given in the match?

It's never been that in football tbf. Any potentially dubious action tends to be assumed guilty. It's not just us either, it's the FA's approach to all teams excluding whichever top 6 side they currently have a hard-on over. I was massively surprised when Shelvey's red was reversed last year, it didn't make any sense given their track record. There is absolutely no way the FA etc can say with 100% conviction that Mitro done that with intent. But alas, "look at his track record" that has been fabricated from a couple of incidents, into a guilty precedent for his future actions.

Innocent until proven guilty etc etc.

So why did he admit the charge then? Because he can't win either way Nessy, howay ffs If he denies it they will ban him longer, and say there was intent. It's a win win for RETROSPECTIVE action, despite it having no consistency.

KI and Neesy agree. We must be wrong. Give it up Sant.

"Yourselves" Who put 50p in you, KI It's not a conspiracy He made a couple of bad challenges in his first season and everything he now does gets over analysed and punished, regardless of the severity compared to worse incidents. If he'd stuck his middle finger up on a live PL game on Sky like that cunt Alli, people would of been offended for the sake of it being Mitro. Because, he's just horrible, isn't he. It's in his nature because he threw rocks at trains as a kid and makes over zealous tackles as a 22 year old who's playing for his favourite club.

Whenever I walk down Northumberland Street I always wonder why people still buy from Sports Direct. Any Newcastle fan should boycott his stores. WAT ABOOT THA CHEEP SOCKS MARRA?

People obviously haven't read the article, because he's not thick, he's right It wasn't given as a foul in game, which is exactly why he reckons he can't understand the retrospective ban. If the ref doesn't deem it a foul, and Lanzini was alright after the game, then MOTD and SSN etc have got him done. Kane snaps Lejuene = "He isn't that type of player" Kachunga kicks Mbemba in the face = Nowt said Mounie stands on Hayden = Nowt said Mitro goes for a shoulder barge and elbows a 5'1 Argentine because of the height difference = HE'S A MONSTER, REMEMBER HIS DEBUT WHEN HE MADE A BAD TACKLE!!!11!!!1 He admittedly doesn't help himself, but from day one MOTD etc have tried to make out his sole intention is to hurt players, despite Costa doing it season after season and being praised for "not being bullied by big centre halfs".

Yep - Matt Le Tiss retweeted it! So did Shearer and that Lindsay lass from SSN.

Actually creasing

I appreciate that, but all I see on twitter is our 11 million NET spend. As if that automatically means our acquisition of players like Merino was pointless.

Bare in mind Merino looks like he could be our new Cabaye, and Lejuene was poached for a cheap-ish buy out fee. Would people rate this window better had we spend 12 mil on Merino instead of a loan, and got Lejuene in for upwards of 12mil aswell. The window was a disappointment in the fact we only got 6 players, yet no LB, no# 10 or striker. But if we had bought those two and had an outlay of 50mil instead of 35mil, would people be happier? Sometimes I feel like our NET spend dictates our effective transfer business to much.

I hope the obligation kicks in at around 20 games so we have to get him.