Bimpy474

He's not willing to sell at £300m, he wants more the greedy fat arsehole. We're his cash cow and he knows it.

That's the spirit

What they are saying is pure bollocks, are they saying if Lovren had not touched it then Kane would be flagged offside ? That's because he was offside, Lovren had to play at it because he couldn't be sure if Kane was or wasn't offside, he couldn't know. Kane is off and has a passed played to him directly and because a Liverpool player tried to intercept or clear it, he is now active and not gaining an advantage from being offside in the first place. Get to fuck, that's just pure and utter nonsense, and not how i or any other ref i know would call onside at any stage. So in the future then, we stick Gayle on the penalty spot 40 yards offside, play a ball forward and if a opposition plays at it and touches it he becomes active, fuck the fuck off with that. Utter pathetic stuff from the refs to cover up their officials mistakes, pure shite.

Fuck em.

We're still shopping in pound land and everybody else has moved up to Harrods.

That's a lot of victims like.

Show the ones on our players in their box for fucks sake.

Exactly, utterly bizarre that

I said that earlier, the 4th official looking at a monitor ?

No. Too quick. Needs to be slow and painful. What if it was a glancing blow, but the shock caused him to shit out his intestines? I was hoping that the fact he had viciously accidentally stabbed himself 20 times might have finished him off but fair point....make it a Ford Hummer.

Ah sorry, would it be ok if gets hit by a falling anvil, acme style ?

I only asked like.

Noted.

Is it wrong to want this man to pass away in his sleep.

Anyone watching SSN News now, you can hear what the linesman is saying and it's wrong as he isn't taking into account who passed the initial ball. The interesting part is the ref asking 'Martin' if he has anything on the tv ? I thought they weren't allowed to do that, refer to the 4th official using a monitor, it's not a Vars game after all.

He is, and something the pundits seem to be completely overlooking.

Well i read the laws as that's off, pretty clearly imo given the direction of the ball as described in your post. I got the impression that Sky and Dermot didn't want to say the officials were wrong in that instance, which is ludicrous, unless the intention was to court controversy, which they would never do, would they.

I hope he plays, feels like a 75% fit Slimani is going to be far better than Gayle of Joselu.

Think we've lost the most points from a winning position of all the teams this season, not a surprise really.

We would had a 10 point deduction for going into administration you nutter.

Don't we have significantly more Premiership experienced players than say Brighton and Huddersfield. Most of our team have played in the Premiership a fair amount, Shelvey, Diame, Clark, Dummett even. It's just we lack real stand out quality something Rafa was trying to address but Ashley wouldn't let him.

Fine margins that amazingly a better striker and say a proper 10 might have helped solve. Then again fat Mike knows better don't he.

That's not how it was meant as you well know young man.

Correct as i interpret the laws. Interpretation being the key, i think this one is quite clear but football as it is, not everyone will agree.

What's missing from the laws as you read them is the direction of the initial ball, where it was played from and by whom. Which is why there's confusion imo. The laws an arse to coin a phrase.