HaydnNUFC

If the question can be put to Rafa which it will, if he answers with something along the lines of that it's a crucial game (which it may well be given Wolves' form and position in the league) and needing support for it then can they not go off of that? Didn't say that before the west ham game though did he The word 'if' was key to that suggestion.

No idea who the investors are but I think he recognises the potential. It's one of the very few things the club has going for it along with its manager.

If the question can be put to Rafa which it will, if he answers with something along the lines of that it's a crucial game (which it may well be given Wolves' form and position in the league) and needing support for it then can they not go off of that?

Can totally get your point but when Caulkin as well as the others come out with stuff verifying it, there's no smoke without fire. Absolutely not having a go at George, but it was him who pushed the Amanda Staveley story last year. Which was true. He saw all three bids. It's the fat cunt shifting the goalposts that messed that one up, only that time he didn't have people going after SD. He didn't really change the goalposts, she came in with a lower offer and they couldn't agree terms after. His valuation was outrageous. £350m-£400m back then was what he was asking wasn't it? Fairly certain she offered £300m (the price he's going to be accepting now by all accounts), although that might've been one of the bids with clauses.

Can totally get your point but when Caulkin as well as the others come out with stuff verifying it, there's no smoke without fire. Absolutely not having a go at George, but it was him who pushed the Amanda Staveley story last year. Which was true. He saw all three bids. It's the fat cunt shifting the goalposts that messed that one up, only that time he didn't have people going after SD.

Can totally get your point but when Caulkin as well as the others come out with stuff verifying it, there's no smoke without fire. Obviously the fat cunt can shaft us at any point but given the circumstances as well as previous events and communications from the MG, I don't think it should go ahead. That doesn't mean stop the protests by any means, just postpone this particular one. TF just coming out with that statement without telling the MG is bad craic iyam. Surprised particularly at the podcast lot who seem like good lads (and lass). But why should you postpone a protest because someone might buy us? Are they going to call off the purchase? If anything it strengthens the hand of a buyer because it makes Ashley more motivated to sell. It would, if thousands took part. I think it's clear that they won't. Rumours, exactly. Shouldn't make a difference. And neither will having it go ahead increase the amount of people doing it that took part in the walk in.

It's not about letting pressure off or stopping all protests. It's postponing a particular one, when rumours are rife and appetite for it isn't high.

May as well have been.

Can totally get your point but when Caulkin as well as the others come out with stuff verifying it, there's no smoke without fire. Obviously the fat cunt can shaft us at any point but given the circumstances as well as previous events and communications from the MG, I don't think it should go ahead. That doesn't mean stop the protests by any means, just postpone this particular one. TF just coming out with that statement without telling the MG is bad craic iyam. Surprised particularly at the podcast lot who seem like good lads (and lass).

My thoughts exactly. I'll still partake if the MG have it going ahead though.

Game that sticks in the mind for was Ba's last minute equaliser after they had 2 goals disallowed, as well as that disgraceful first half performance under Pardew that had a bairn in the away end in tears.

If we get taken over before January I'll buy whatever the fuck anyone wants in any of the bars in Newcastle the weekend after it's announced (If it isn't on a weekend itself)

BBC reporting about him also this morning: When was it first rumoured he was interested? About two month ago maybe? Day of the Leicester home game.

Keith Downie now peddling the Kenyon patter.

Has he not already done that? I don’t think we know the half of it yet. True. The biggest crime he and his cunts have committed here imo is getting many die hard fans, many of which are on here and they know who they are, hating the club and feeling apathetic about it to the point of them not knowing if they'll ever have that burning passion again. Getting them back would be the greatest thing a takeover could ever bring for me.

Absolute arseholes.

Has he not already done that?

The man believes that we think we should be competing with Manchester City and the rest of the top 6, he's an absolute bell end. Either way, I'd bite your hand off if you offered the roll of the dice. It'd be more enthralling than this shit ever will be.

I imagine the merchandising et cetera would be tied up in disgusting SD deals for an eternity. Urgh.

More interested in the 'supposed multi billionaire' who has verbally met the asking price. I want to believe Take it all with a pinch of salt the entirety of the Khewra mine.

It's Kenyon according to Edwards.

Been injured. Just had an op recently. Saw him play in the friendly at Hull and he looked quick and quite tricky.

Probably because they are a bunch of whining, bitter, phlem mouthed, thieving sc*use cunts. Blue or red, both sets of fans are utter cunts. I hope one of them reads this. I wish I hadn't read it let alone them. Everton fans do have some sort of weird hatred for us for no reason. Genuinely can't think why, football friends with the mackems maybe?

So basically what The Telegraph said, but now with the date 31st instead of before January. Such riveting journalism. Reeks how no one but Luke Edwards (apparently anyway) knew about this, now they're all on it. Northern Echo too.

Top work, Darth. Also, sorry if it's already been posted but