Jump to content

polkaDot

Member
  • Posts

    949
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by polkaDot

  1. canny camel toe on the lad with the dog
  2. that Flannels shit off the hoardings as well?
  3. There's nothing racist about that banner, it depicts an actual person and does not resort to a grotesque depiction of human features (nose, lips etc) that racist material uses. What it's missing is a Tory on it, selling the sword to him.
  4. It’s like Eddy the Eagle blaming his crap attempt at a self portrait on the tins of paint he got from Picasso.
  5. How anyone can have any respect for him after that last interview. What a wet arsed fraud this cunt is. Shameless as fuck.
  6. Just ban this daft mackem c*** Not sure he’s a Mackem, unless there are Mackems from Bedlington. Northumberland has pockets of Sunderland fans thanks to the old mining communities where families in the north east would sometimes move to different pits to work . Remnants of scab labour that were brought in by the pit bosses when the locals were on strike.
  7. It’s amazing how quickly those who associate with Ashley are willing to cover themselves head to toe in shit. Mike loves the scat.
  8. QuakesMag[/member] I’ve read some good posts on here recently but that is absolutely spot on mate. Cheers.
  9. Perfectly summed up in one sentence.
  10. Looking forward to seeing Bruce stick his steak bake back in his pocket at the end of another shit performance.
  11. A squad without any strikers. Aye ok Turn it around? The cheeky cunt. Absolutely fucking clueless.
  12. the past 6 weeks have been like a far-fetched episode of Black Mirror
  13. all that said and done, the line should finally be drawn when the turncoat puts pen to paper. All previous disagreements between fans about managers/takeovers/boycotts etc should be laid to rest, the time is now. From the moment that pen is put to paper that's the dividing line.
  14. It's being tactically polite. You can't tell folks that what they're doing is wrong, they'll just resist. here mate your arse is on fire. fuck off don't tell me what to do.
  15. From .com £5m minimum, say the Times.... as if being a manc turncoat & mackem collaborator isn't bad enough
  16. a turncoat that managed the mackems. you're right though.
  17. Absolutely. I find this baffling. I work for a newspaper myself and I cover football, and I do a fair bit of investigative reporting. I would understand the hesitancy to publish something investigative (i.e. damaging for the club or individuals associated with it) if it wasn’t well sourced, hastily put together and subsequently could mean no access to anything within the club. But none of that should be an issue. 1. It’s been 12 years. There’s plenty of time for a journalist to investigate Ashley and his running of NUFC, build relationships, dig for documentation or get ahold of material. With time on your hands, you should be able to build a comprehensive case that portrays and illustrates how he’s enriched himself and his companies on NUFC’s behalf. 2. There’s no access anyway. I’ve worked in England and covered Premier League. The way it’s regulated is a piss take, players are protected, managers and others speak on their own terms. The same when I’ve been around the England team, it’s set up in a way that doesn’t exactly encourage critical reporting. When someone talks, it’s most often not through the club anyway. In other words, I can’t see the logic in withholding a relationship with the club (especially not Newcastle). Press conference quotes? Match reports? Quotes from Jamal Lascelles and Paul Dummett saying they’re excited for the League Cup tie with Luton? Nick them off others. 3. The lack of critical and investigative reporting on football in general, Newcastle United in particular, presents a golden opportunity brand-wise. From a reader’s perspective (fans) it’s hugely appreciated when irregularities are discovered and presented. There’s so much to gain from it, and it serves one of the core purposes of journalism. Put money and time into it and you’ll be rewarded long term. However, I don’t think this sort of criticism should be aimed at reporters. It’s a strategic question, most probably dealt with by editors and others higher up the hierarchy. Still, with NUFC being such an obvious case, it’s unbelievable that no investigative reporter from another desk, at another newspaper than The Chronicle, has had a real go. Good post. we need Nick Broomfield on the case.
  18. Why not log back in as Odin? - I miss him posting under that user name. D. Yimentov Fooling no one frankly I'm not Odin. He's a little slug compared to me. And if you want to keep slinging petty accusations, name any pub car park between Cramlington and Birtley and I'll meet you there, man on man. But I'm warning you, I'm big and I'm hard . Not into dogging, thanks for the offer though sweetcheeks x Fit & proper cheeks
  19. A total fucking arsehole that bloke. With fans like that we are fucked.
×
×
  • Create New...