Joey Linton

4 minutes ago, neesy111 said:

 

Clearly going to score now.

He'll be going some to do it from where he's sitting. 

Fernandez really can't do it against the decent sides. Absolutely anonymous again tonight but for the whinging.

1 minute ago, madras said:

Well we know that was a lie.

We all know the reason we needed that extra loan from him was because we got relegated to the championship. We all know that was his fault too. 

31 minutes ago, Thiago said:

I don't get why they wouldn't just get the train and send the gear up in the bus. 

Have you seen the price of train tickets?

All those journalists haranguing Howe whilst praising Tuchel at the weekend too.

13 minutes ago, Si said:

But they are obviously.

I think they are. But the Premier League are on record as saying they definitely aren't. 

Just now, Gaztoon said:

 

Won't matter.

 

The push as started and its not going to stop until they sell up

Why would they sell up? And to whom? 

Given all the despicable stuff that has occurred under the control of the Saudi government I dare say they won't be too concerned that Ollie Holt has written some nasty words about them. 

8 minutes ago, jack j said:

Just caught the back of neville on skysporrs there. Is he suggesting they redo the ownerships rules and therefore take our ownership away?

Our ownership who they cleared as not being intrinsically linked to the Saudi state? 

4 minutes ago, HaydnNUFC said:

And on Glendenning, I suppose him being a mackem plays a part in this, given he's not once had a go at Guardiola for working at Man City but is going all out on Howe.

If we were 20th in the table he'd not be suggesting Howe should quit. 

Can't have caught it in the Manchester Derby because he never got within 6 feet of City's midfielders all game. 

1 minute ago, WarrenBartonCentrePartin said:

People in the replies asking exactly what he wants Howe to say. He wants him to resign ?

 

 

Of course he wants him to resign. But it's not because of the executions. 

41 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

 

What's this based on?

I think its fairly obvious what it's based on. 

2 minutes ago, triggs said:

What exactly did he do wrong today? The time he lost the ball in his own half was a clear foul. The 2 Chelsea players literally sandwiched him

Nothing. Just it's his turn on here this week, that's all. 

Defended very well today. 

VAR doesn't necessarily have to give the penalty, but the system is in place for the referee to have a proper look at a decision he couldn't make because his view was obscured. They've just ignored that option. 

Also if he'd given the penalty does VAR deem there wasn't enough of a shirt pull and reverse the decision? Is that a thing now too? 

We have some absolute idiots amongst our support. 

It's quite funny seeing Edwards, who claimed we hadn't done sufficient good transfer business in January to stay up, now claim that we're only staying up because of the transfer business we did in January. 

11 minutes ago, neesy111 said:

I think what @christ has said is right.  They are buying the fans to do the sportswashing for them. 

They definitely are, no doubt about that. 

Some fans of other clubs, as happened on here, are more than happy to provoke the situation be intimating that there's a tacit approval from our fans of what's happening in Saudi Arabia / Yemen. 

13 minutes ago, gbandit said:

I look on Twitter and see some pretty horrible replies from NUFC accounts whenever people bring up Saudi Arabian human rights issues and it makes me think more about the sportswashing debate.

That's not the case on here though. Perhaps Froggy should take his shit WUM attempts there if that's his game. 

3 minutes ago, reefatoon said:

Thanks for that. Froggy was asking us what we thought, but to give an opinion you have to have the full story. Do you know what they were on death row for? It’s tricky to base an opinion until you know all the details. 

He didn't ask what anyone thought mind. 

1 minute ago, Froggy said:

 

The same post with the thumbs up from anyone else and the reaction is different, but the post would never have been made. My post was the the first one in this thread for a full week despite everything that is going on. 

 

And once again, apologies for the thumbs up. It wasn't meant to be distasteful. 

 

 

What was it meant to be out of interest? 

1 minute ago, Froggy said:

There's no WUM attempt, but there's a curiosity in how the fans of your club view these kind of things. 

We all think it's fantastic mate. Great stuff. Idiot. 

3 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

Bites, basically. It's crass.

Fairly obvious when posting at the end of the news he was posting. 

1 minute ago, Froggy said:

 

This is a thread specifically created about the downside of Saudi ownership, and Saudi Arabia just had the biggest mass execution in their history today. Given the sanctions placed on Abramovich due to the war in Ukraine it's a massive discussion point. 

 

Pretty poor comment from an admin of the forum. Do better. 

 

Almost as poor as your use of the thumbs up emoji in your post given the circumstances. 

https://www.manutd.com/en/news/detail/manchester-united-agree-strategic-partnership-in-saudi-arabia