Jump to content

RobsonsWonderland

Member
  • Posts

    774
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RobsonsWonderland

  1. 1 hour ago, nufcjb said:

    Never seen this thread this low in the thread list a day or so before the window shuts. Absolute honking window this has been for everyone in general.

     

    Glad we've kept hold of Trippier though. Would have been even an even worse January if we didn't.

    I do wonder how close some clubs are sailing to the wind with regards to financial fair play.

    I bet there is one or two who needed to sell to balance the books but are now sweating as nobody is buying in this window! 

  2. 1 hour ago, Pata said:

    Loans are never easy either when we are not a perennial relegation candidate anymore. You need a player who's good enough for us and a team who are willing to loan that player to us.

    The problem for winter loans is that Eddie would bed them in until they were upto speed and hyper fitness.

    Ignoring Hall... Even Gordon as a perm buy needed the summer break to catch up 

  3. Why can't we love both Keegan and Robson with equal measure? 

     

    Both have been the highlights of my football life and will defend them both to the hilt.

     

    I bet  if Robson had replaced Keegan straight away, we would have continued to improve or maintain those levels.

     

    It still breaks my heart how that team was ripped apart by dalglish and the board.

  4. 36 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

    Edwards naming Kone and Thuram as possible targets, does say them taking time to adapt to English football is potentially putting us off.

    Wonder what he said about... 13 goals later! 

     

    But to be fair he never did understand the offside rule or that you were not allowed to spit on people so he might have a point lol

  5. Never mind any personal  rumours.

     

    It's Bayern Munich, one of the top elite clubs in Europe.

     

    As much as I Iove Newcastle, I think every players head would be turned if they were interested! 

     

     

  6. Just now, Ghandis Flip-Flop said:


    The club has some form of doing exactly that in allowing Wood and Shelvey to go last January, when theoretically much more was on the line (top 4 qualification).

     

     

    Neither player would have started games at the end of last season 

  7. A different level maybe but the sale of Woods and Shelvey last winter was overlooked because a, the fans didn't like them and b, we got ridiculous fees for them.

     

    those sales allowed us to buy Gordan/ balance the books ahead of the summer.

     

    So I understand if we end up flipping a couple of our higher rated players this year even more so if it's a deal that will allow us more flex if a long term player becomes available.

     

     

  8. 9 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

    Hope was shielded for a long time because of how he went in on Bruce. He's a really unlikeable, shit-stirring bloke, who just like actual journalists, has a ridiculously inflated opinion about the worth of the work he does.

     

     

     

    Obviously it's because Hope is Bruce's long lost son...  And he only popped around his mother's house for the Bacon!

    CRAIGHOPE-BRUCE.webp

  9. 1 hour ago, gbandit said:

    Does anyone actually want to stay in KSA other than Gerrard and Neves?

    What's the deal with having to pay tax if you leave within two years?

     

    I guess only keeping half of your fortune must be a gutter for you 

  10. I do wonder if Ashworths success at Brighton was due to them being a plucky underdog and flying under the radar.

     

    Our squad could really do with some lower prices gambles but does our perceived riches make that harder to negotiate bargains.

     

    Even another of own Perez or Schar would be great right now...

     

     

  11. 2 minutes ago, sushimonster85 said:

    I do think Sky will start to get restless if there are further Jan windows like this. Viewing figures/general engagement will be way down. 

     

    Between commercial partners, and FFP starting to bite even for top 6 sides (Man U and Chelsea both apparently limited this window) I can see a re-jig of the rules in the next couple years. I mean, even just adjusting the losses allowed to account for inflation would be a start. It hasn't changed since it was implemented.

    I think the limit should also be reviewed each year based on the most recent window.

     

     Chelsea, Arsenal and City spending £100 million plus on a single player massively inflated the transfer window.

    As much as I dislike them, even Liverpool were priced out of bidding war with Chelsea for Caicedo because of the fee arsenal paid for Rice.

     

    And to be fair he never looked a 100 million player before or after they signed him

     

     

  12. 1 hour ago, black_n_white said:

    Mad that the transfer window is open and barely any club can sign neebody

    What it needs is a well run club with rich owners and  deep pockets to start buying players...

     

    Then who knows the club who sold the player would either be able to balance their books or be able to spend money and buy a replacement.

     

    Radical idea but we could even call it a transfer window and everyone could join in.

  13. 1 minute ago, The Prophet said:

     

    They're making it up on the fly though. If they were public regulator going to judicial review they'd get laughed out of court.

    if it is 10 points and only allowed to be fined once... Let's go spend 300 million and take the hit.

     

    But you are right they make it up after the event and we would be relegated no matter what.

     

  14. 33 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

    :lol:

     

    Farcical. Everton are guilty of wrongdoing, but the rules are completely unfit for purpose. Farcical.

    I'm not sure Everton have a leg to stand on there...

    You can lose 135 million over three years but if that all falls in one year, you will have to carry that loss for the next two years reports as well.

     

    You can't just sweep it under the carpet and pretend it's not there after you have been fined once.

     

     

     

     

  15. 4 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

    Yeah, the PL are much happier with debt than investment.  Which just further proves that the FFP regs are not there to stop clubs going ‘pop’

    I know it sounds daft but the penny has just dropped with your explanation! 

     

    If anybody bought any other business and had the funds to grow their company there would be no legal rule to stop them??

     

    Yet our owners are unable to invest their money, which even at the going rate, would drop funds into other clubs and gradually feed money down the leagues (minus agent fees !)

     

     

     

     

  16. 1 hour ago, The College Dropout said:

    I’m not a football manager. 
     

    Do you think every good manager in world football would’ve done exactly as Eddie did last night at half time? At 55 minutes? At 2-2? 
     

    There’s this idea that there’s nothing Eddie can do tactically or with substitutions in those situations and it makes no sense to me. 
     

    Considering we didn’t play any football for 45 minutes.  Fresh legs that can follow runs and be brave alone would’ve been worth bringing on. 

    I would agree if only those fresh legs could replace players in the positions we were tired.

     

    Full backs, CB, 2 GKs and kid to bring on.

     

    Hall was really the only viable option left.

     

    Now we can argue the squad depth / ffp is at fault for that but we have lost to the likes of PSG, Chelsea, Liverpool and Man City in the closing minutes because of two key factors.

     

    Mental and physical fatigue of our 13 players and the ability for those teams above to bring on international quality attacking players to give it one last push.

     

    Otherwise I can't see how team tactics work for 90 minutes and we then forget all that in injury time.

     

     

  17. Are we just going to ignore the fact that whilst the 3 CMS might be fluid, none of them have the natural speed and agility to play the game some of you are suggesting.

     

    Then add the fact they are running on empty, the out balls are limited because the winners are also goosed then I think it's harsh to ultra critical that they are not performing at their peak at the moment.

  18. 52 minutes ago, Miggys First Goal said:

    From the BBC football gossip:

     

     

    To be fair both teams must be desperate to stock pile even more CMs in their squad.

     

    I'm sure we will even sell him at half the market price as well

     

×
×
  • Create New...