KingArthur

How do you know what the wages are?

Replacing Isak with 2 strikers, one of them proven in EPL and another a big talent, is a good move. Isak is a great player, but if this happens (and we use extra money smartly) we are better off.

Naah, you have to look at the big picture. Wilson was useless and Isak can't press after 60 minutes. We are going to play around 50-55(?) games this season, and replacing Isak with a top talent and a proven EPL striker, who both are not injured often + money to spend, is a smart move. If Isak would be going to PSG, I wouldn't even care. Him going to Liverpool is the shitty thing here. Of course this all depends on Sesko being a good pick. If he is Beto mk 2, then we have made a horrible mistake.

Prime Wilson is different thing. But last season we pretty much had Isak and useless Wilson and maybe Osula/Gordon. Sesko and Wissa offers a lot more.

If we replace Isak-Wilson with Sesko and Wissa that is big improvement.

And he isnt good enough

Training tomorrow again or Tuesday?

Again this fking Elliott stuff. He is not a starter here and not suitable for Howe’s football. Why would we take less money to get a bench warmer?

No. Nunez would not be a starter here

Truth is they know nothing, but want to report a lot for clicks.

The thing is, when training starts at Newcastle, he should be there. When actual preseason games starts, he should be there. I have trust we make the right call on this. If he stays, I back him as long as he wears black and white.

And their offer was not 120 million.

Point is, they might have money anyway. But do they NEED Isak for 150 million? They have 1 left winger, quite a weak cover for Salah, and 2,5 CBs. I think Isak is just not worth 150 million for them.

Yasir must have said that it is a trip to the embassy if this doesnt stop. edit. And I dont believe until 1st September.

Ffs I dont want Harvey Elliott, who is a bench warmer, anywhere near this conversation.

Great logic. Ashley, who did nothing for 15 years, didnt cause "long term harm" for club that was maybe the only one in EPL whose commercial revenue didn't improve in 15 years. And was relegated twice.

Let’s say we have said he can leave this summer. Surely we have said that for an acceptable price? Like he is under contract and worth more that 120-130 million surely

Exactly. Money keeps him happy, we get a year out of him and he has a way out next summer. New DoF plans who to replace him with in 2026 We are not going to sell him without good replacement. That would be suicidal business from the club. Could even see Howe walk after that.

I still don't see Liverpool paying what we want. If I would have to guess, he signs a new contract with a significant pay rise and release clause.

I watch more that 200 games of football per year. Most of time I have no idea how good or bad some random player is.

Muniz as a second striker is not awful, at least he is upgrade on Wilson. Then again, so would most of this forum.

So Liverpool won't bid and Isak gets a new contract? All is fine? edit. I think this burglary thing is blown out of proportion also:

Muniz's stats are actually pretty decent. Eddie could get something out of him. To replace Wilson? Good choice.

We are 100 % looking for CB

Strand Larsen is a non starter. Hope should know that.